Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Rumour] J.T. Miller Trade/Contract Talks


Podzilla

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Alflives said:

there's roster depth and then there's having great players.  Roster depth doesn't cover up for injured great players.  Lose one of Demko, Petey, Miller, or Hughes and our chances of winning go into the toilet in the playoffs.  Especially if it's Hughes. 

Miller is the one guy you can skip there. 

In playoffs Horvat, Motte, Petey etc will show what it means. They got experiance now. They only need deep roster that Can help them. 

Many here is blinded by numbers and don' t see what actually happens. 

I can admit that Miller has now a better confidence and tries things he didn't before like the goal he made after dekeing.

That' s one side i've seen a lot from Petey but not Miller.

Hell, even Loui would thrive being around Boudreau. 

 

Edited by Timråfan
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

I base my judgement on how Miller have played the games I've seen. .

Most of those games have Miller taking advantage of Hughes coming on left side and Miller don't involve the best player on the team, Petey(here I can say that Hughes might be the best for now as he is really good taking the puck into OZ) 

Change Miller to Petey and Petey would have more points than Miller. 

So for me it's very easy. 

Let Miller and Petey change side and you'll see what I'm talking about.

If we had a player line Shea Theodore on the right side Petey would have a chance also. . 

 

I wouldn't have bothered with Petey's points if I haven't seen with my own eyes how Miller got an advantage on the left side. 

So you didn't get the "favourite hockey player is your countryman" right. 

 

 

Miller isn't on Pete's line, so I assume you are talking about the PP.  You do know that the Canucks have

PP coach that decides who plays wherever on it.

 

Your strange obsession toward Miller is a bit odd.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, higgyfan said:

Miller isn't on Pete's line, so I assume you are talking about the PP.  You do know that the Canucks have

PP coach that decides who plays wherever on it.

 

Your strange obsession toward Miller is a bit odd.

The PP is the case, yes. But then you have that Petey hasn't Hughes in his back as Miller has. So it's not only the PP. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

Goodness me, talk about delirious... What about a real smack in the nose taking out Hughes and Demko in the same playoff serie 

Do you think Miller will carry the team on his back? 

Ir is it just Miller time with you guys?

You smoke crack much?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, aGENT said:

 

Not necessarily (though it would be great if we get a younger, ELC/RFA version of one by luck).

 

Because of cap, age, contention windows and opportunity cost.

We don’t need to get younger, we are already pretty young, I would like to see a top six vetern not at the cost of Miller horvat or Petterson 

Edited by AlphaNuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

Miller is the one guy you can skip there. 

In playoffs Horvat, Motte, Petey etc will show what it means. They got experiance now. They only need deep roster that Can help them. 

Many here is blinded by numbers and don' t see what actually happens. 

I can admit that Miller has now a better confidence and tries things he didn't before like the goal he made after dekeing.

That' s one side i've seen a lot from Petey but not Miller.

Hell, even Loui would thrive being around Boudreau. 

 

Loui…

 

Open Door What GIF

Edited by SilentSam
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

We aren't in playoffs yet and we aren't a threat yet.

Don't you understand that I want roster depth before playoffs?

Do you think we have roster depth for a playoff run now?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don’t you understand that you control nothing at all regarding the Vancouver Canucks and that it is not your choice and you cannot will your thinking patterns unto the team and they’ll abide?

 

We have the team to go deep in the playoffs yes. 
 

The idea that you shouldn’t try until you have a sure bet Cup team is completely asinine. It just doesn’t work that way. It never has, and it never will.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

If tge GM thinks short sighted like you we don't get a cup..  Benning suit your way of thinkinh. 

 

 

Aiiight perpetual rebuilder.
 

Get your Lego set and show me whatcha got.

 

Edited by Me_
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Me_ said:

Don’t you understand that you control nothing at all regarding the Vancouver Canucks and that it is not your choice and you cannot will your thinking patterns unto the team and they’ll abide?

 

We have the team to go deep in the playoffs yes. 
 

The idea that you shouldn’t try until you have a sure bet Cup team is completely asinine. It just doesn’t work that way. It never has, and it never will.

Sorry to burst your bubble... We don't have a deep roster 

Give me proof that we have a deep roster. 

Edited by Timråfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RWJC said:

Don’t forget Free Agency in terms of potential D options. Especially after next season. Again, that’s usually overpayment tho.

Exactly. It's a route I'd prefer not using for too many key pieces. Better to use that tool to fill in role/depth players.

 

4 minutes ago, AlphaNuck said:

We don’t need to get younger, we are already pretty young, I would like to see a top six vetern not at the cost of Miller horvat or Petterson 

We do on D. Badly. Younger, faster and cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

Sorry to burst your bubble... We don't have a deep roster 

Give me proof that we have a deep roster. 

21-8-5 since Boudreau took over.

 

Edited by Me_
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

Goodness me, talk about delirious... What about a real smack in the nose taking out Hughes and Demko in the same playoff serie 

Do you think Miller will carry the team on his back? 

Ir is it just Miller time with you guys?

Miller is a good leader. 
in the game of hockey, you have a team,.  Nobody Carries  any one on there back.

 

What if, What if, What if, What if..  that’s all your coming up with Timra..  it’s a fantasy comment,.    Injuries happen.

 

I was talking about how this team ( includes the entire roster) would play well against the same team, over 7 games in 14 days.

I think they would do well.

 

I’ll let you deal with your fears, and speculation with the right doctor.

Good Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SilentSam said:

Miller is a good leader. 
in the game of hockey, you have a team,.  Nobody Carries  any one on there back.

 

What if, What if, What if, What if..  that’s all your coming up with Timra..  it’s a fantasy comment,.    Injuries happen.

 

I was talking about how this team ( includes the entire roster) would play well against the same team, over 7 games in 14 days.

I think they would do well.

 

I’ll let you deal with your fears, and speculation with the right doctor.

Good Luck.

What is the main reason the Canucks didn't bring home the cup? 

Injuries... 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

Ok, so now it' s lego also 

I'm up to posters talking about drugs and lego. 

Oh, how will I ever win such a battle of wits. 

God complex to boot. You stand alone on the mountain of greatness.

 

Edited by Me_
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...