Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[PGT] Anaheim Ducks at Vancouver Canucks | Feb. 19, 2022

Rate this topic


-Vintage Canuck-

Recommended Posts

Record vs teams in our division.

 

Teams ahead of us

 

0-1-2 vs the Oilers.

1-2-1 vs the Ducks.

OTL vs the Flames.

Regulation loss vs the Knights.

1-0-1 vs the Kings

 

 

We have 4 wins vs Seattle and SJS. Both behind us.

 

Besides Anaheim and Seattle, everyone else in the division have games in hand.

 

Kings/Knights 1 game in hand.

Oilers 2 games in hand.

SJS/Flames 3 games in hand.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Team played like they wanted to see roster changes. No passion, no hustle, Boeser looked like he'd never played the game before and Miller looked disinterested.

 

The die was cast in the very first minute of play when Burroughs was stapled to the boards on a questionable hit, was obviously hurt and there wasn't even the hint of a pushback.  Ditto in the 3rd. when Hoglander got stapled.  

 

It's fine to say that Schenn is tough enough to go after the perpetrator but......the tough guys on the team need to be forwards, not defensemen.  You have a D take a 5 minute penalty and it totally disrupts the defensive structure.  But a forward taking a 5 minute penalty is OK because it's much easier to juggle those lines.

 

Hope that management all watched this game and will meet tomorrow to discuss who is salvageable and who needs to go.  I think it will be a real defining moment for this team and that BIG changes will happen between now and the opening game of next season.

 

Cheers.

 

 

  • Cheers 3
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RU SERIOUS said:

That;s because this frachise has been built on stoic/passive Swedish Values for the past 25 years.   Unfortunately, our so called leader (captain) was baptized and neutered by the Sedins and thats why you see that lack of grit in our locker room.  I'd bet $5 bucks that JR gets rid of Bo if he's truly intent on changing the culture of the team.   

Complete freakin' bogus bullsh*t.

 

The Sedins were winners... they lost the Cup to the Bruins not because they weren't tough enough but because A) we lost most of our D to injuries and Ryan Kesler was also crippled, and B )  the Bruin's pet league disciplinary committee refused to suspend Johnny Boychuk for the crippling hit on Mason Raymond but suspended Aaron Rome for hitting Tyler Seguin.

  • Cheers 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, *Buzzsaw* said:

To all those who scream:  "TEAR IT DOWN!!... TEAR ALL DOWN!!!"... can't help but notice you are the same bunch who screamed:  "TRADE PETTERSSON!".

 

Fact is, this team has some good pieces and some mediocre and some bad.

 

But overall there is a decent set of players to build on.  3 or 4 good additions and the team could be challenging for the Cup.

 

The idea that management should burn down the team and start from scratch is not realistic.

 

Yes the team needs competent defensive help to complement Hughes/Myers/OEL/Schenn.... that's two defensemen, one in the #2 position to complement Hughes and one in the #5 position to complement Schenn in the #6.   OEL and Myers are the 3/4.  Both those additions need to have size.

 

And yes, we do need a viable 3rd line center to go with Podz/Hoglander... also someone with size.

 

And maybe we need another top six forward.... but realistically the D first, and then the 3rd line have gotta be the focus.

 

So all we need is another top 6 forward, a top pairing D and a 3rd line C?  So we'll just pull that right out of our buttholes, like a magic trick?

 

Schenn is battling for his career every night he's out there, Myers and OEL are on the downsides of their careers. The defence needs serious help

 

Our forwards are slow and soft and we still have none of them locked up long term, outside of Garland.

 

This team is in trouble and very well may need to be torn down unless a miracle happens 

Edited by Kovalchuk
  • Cheers 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We seem to pay whenever we drop down to 5 Dmen. 

I want a physical hitting dman on the 4th line. What 7-8 mins? As insurance for these 8-10 games every season. As a softer type team I feel we need to. 

Pools, Burr, Rathbone even Schenn. 

Especially running a no name crew. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kovalchuk said:

So all we need is another top 6 forward, a top pairing D and a 3rd line C?  So we'll just pull that right out of our buttholes?

 

Schenn is battling for his career every night he's out there, Myers and OEL are on the downsides of their careers. The defence needs serious help

 

Our forwards are slow and soft and we still have none of them locked up long term, outside of Garland.

 

This team is in trouble and very well may need to be torn down unless a miracle happens 

You're as bogus as the player you use as your signature.

 

There are moves which can be made... if management want to make them.

 

For example, signing Tryamkin... that provides the the #5 D position... in fact, maybe it even provides the #2 D.

 

They could sign him if they want to... they could make room in the CAP for him.

 

There are other decent defensemen which are coming available in the summer... get rid of Poolman and you have room.

 

Trade Halak and you have more room.

 

Trade Dickenson and you have even more room.

 

Look at the free agents available... there are options there for the 3rd line.

 

And yes, one player from the top six could be traded for D if necessary... but personally I am against dealing Miller.

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *Buzzsaw* said:

You're as bogus as the player you use as your signature.

 

There are moves which can be made... if management want to make them.

 

For example, signing Tryamkin... that provides the the #5 D position... in fact, maybe it even provides the #2 D.

 

They could sign him if they want to... they could make room in the CAP for him.

 

There are other decent defensemen which are coming available in the summer... get rid of Poolman and you have room.

 

Trade Halak and you have more room.

 

Trade Dickenson and you have even more room.

 

Look at the free agents available... there are options there for the 3rd line.

 

And yes, one player from the top six could be traded for D if necessary... but personally I am against dealing Miller.

 

 

Tryamkin?  Just make Dickenson and Halak disappear, then trade a top 6 forward even though we need more top 6 forwards?   So yeah, this is a magic trick.

 

Kovalchuk would skate circles around anyone on this team and would drop the gloves and show heart.  Get outtta heerree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, hammertime said:

 

While Bo hasn't been good enough. Trading him would be a huge mistake. 

Last season I didn’t mind him. Won lots of face offs and shot more. This season he’s useless and may play better for another team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DeNiro said:

Well at least if OEL and Burroughs are out we’ll be able to call up our stud offensive defenseman Rathbone!

 

 

What’s that you say? He was run with a dirty hit without any pushback too?

 

Welp. I guess Sautner and Hunt will have to do!

OEL is out? he get hurt? I missed that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...