The Juice Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 By "blockbuster" deal he means he will be wearing a Blockbuster Video t-shirt while he trades Raymond to them for 5 free rentals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckbeliever Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Anyone think this thread WASNT started by Sam? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesy_shoes Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Bigger news if he said it wasn't a possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFBR392 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Since when is Mike Gillis a reliable source? Unless samjam said it I just won't believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Brahma Bull Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Bet its a real "blockbuster" like Raymond for a 3rd round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent.S Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Also, for everyone hating on SamJam if he gets it right you know your buried right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingo Chili Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 do it...do IT....DO IT !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 With the upcoming lockout, it appears that it'll be up to Gillis and Burke to maintain some interest in hockey up here until January. 'Possible blockbuster deal at the draft?'. That's Burke talk, not Gillis talk. We're starting down TO's path, folks. TOML Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gizmo2337 Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 You must take it seriously if you remeber some posters and note down their personalities. And I don't take CDC seriously. If I took it seriously, I wouldn't have made an accout, trust me. It's where people discuss the NHL and the Canucks more importantly. We're a big community of Canucks fans. Some with more info than others, and some who like to post more than others. I didn't single you out or say anything personal to you. I just made a general comment. You took it "seriously" though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 It'll probably be Luongo to Toronto... I just don't see a better fit for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 thanks OP - always like to hear what the GM says. Luongo to Florida - before the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester@wraiths.ca Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 'Possible blockbuster deal at the draft?'. That's Burke talk, not Gillis talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck or Die Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 What day is the draft, anyways? Is it July 1st, or is that when free agency starts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 What day is the draft, anyways? Is it July 1st, or is that when free agency starts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 What day is the draft, anyways? Is it July 1st, or is that when free agency starts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey2Dope Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 He never said anything about us specifically being involved in a possible block buster just that they happen sometimes at the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edler's Mind Tricks Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 No because it clearly says it was started by samjam. Also, for everyone hating on SamJam if he gets it right you know your buried right? At the same time, no disrespect samjam but the reason most of us do not believe this Luongo to Toronto crap is because you are a poster on CDC. Above that, when we go on twitter we can clearly see you are a kid graduating from high school. I have a tough time believing that a kid from high school gets insider info like this while long time bloggers such as Jeff Angus do not not. It just sounds too illogical to make sense. At the same respect, if it is genuinely the case that Luongo will most likely to be moved to Toronto then more power to ya and I guess we will soon find out you are the brown Darren Dreger or "Darenjit Singh Dreger (i can make this joke because I am also brown) However, most of us who have seen idiots like Eklund, Brochuishockey and virtually everyone and there mother tell us that Gaborik will be on the Canucks, Sundin will be signed right away, Gomez is coming to Vancouver (in 06), Weber loves Vancouver, Scott Niedermeyer will retire as a Canuck, Forsberg would for sure sign with Vancouver will continue taking every rumor with a huge grain of salt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everybody Hates Raymond Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Samjam99, I hope you realize that even if you are right about the Luongo trade, you will be ostracised by CDC and still be labelled as an "attention whore". You need an alternative ID here if you want to post free of this crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 Um, that would kinda miss the point of being an attention whore. TOML Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 And what? Samjam99 and Angus shill jobs too? Jeez. With this many self-proclaimed experts who have fantasy insiders floating around these days, who needs Eklund's random Canadian team-based rumblings anymore? You know... This is why the upcoming lockout is gonna suck. Instead of actual hockey being played, we're going to witness an epic playoff between several miscellaneous randoms with inside information that may or may not be 'certified' BS. I don't mind the information, actually. Some of it is worthy of reading when there's nothing else. But the shameless pimping? Please. Gonna be a LOOOONG lockout, people. TOML Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.