JoeyJoeJoeJr. Shabadoo Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 This is the only reason to see the Hobbit: http://filmonic.com/evangeline-lilly-says-her-character-is-lethal-and-deadly-in-the-hobbit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa........... My internet skills have failed me; as I had no idea she was in the films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shift-4 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 I may have just changed my tune. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slaytanic Wehrmacht Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slaytanic Wehrmacht Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Candidate for our Wonder Woman discussion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shift-4 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Is a pig's ass pork? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Candidate for our Wonder Woman discussion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slaytanic Wehrmacht Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Gina Carano End of discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Ambien Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Correct me if I'm wrong, but you don't have to watch the movies if you think it's going to be a yawn trilogy without real content. When can you honestly say a movie was able to or had the time to tell a story in as good detail as a book? Pretty sure that would be never. So maybe these ones can come close to that. Almost everyone says any book had more to give than the movie of the same story, because the movie couldn't make it so detailed... I for one am looking forward to seeing all three. Only minus is waiting a year or a little less between each movie. It was a long wait the last time as well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tocnhockey Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Last part of that looks like a drunk telling you to be quiet......................which fits Sharpie quite well come to think of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilbro Baggins Posted July 31, 2012 Author Share Posted July 31, 2012 I agree with everything this guy says about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiDeN Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 I really liked John Carter. I thought it was a shame it did so poorly at the box office and reviews. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLASSJAW Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 I agree with everything this guy says about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Considering I read John Carter stories in the 80's I didn't think it was that bad. The problem is trying to explain going to Barsoom by wishing is tough to work in a modern story. Maybe Jackson wants to go all out on the Battle of the Five Armies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Considering I read John Carter stories in the 80's I didn't think it was that bad. The problem is trying to explain going to Barsoom by wishing is tough to work in a modern story. Maybe Jackson wants to go all out on the Battle of the Five Armies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiDeN Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 I wouldn't doubt it....among going more in-depth in a couple of other areas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avelanch Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbo Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 What the hell? It took me like 3 hours to read the whole book. How can they make 3 movies out of that? I guess they just don't care if the movies are awful, Jackson & co. know that the audiences will flock to the theatres anyway and they'll make their millions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 What the hell? It took me like 3 hours to read the whole book. How can they make 3 movies out of that? I guess they just don't care if the movies are awful, Jackson & co. know that the audiences will flock to the theatres anyway and they'll make their millions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiDeN Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 There's no doubt that the studio will make more money, but why does that bother you? The point of adding the 3rd movie from your perspective, and from what's being expressed by Jackson, is that by adding a 3rd part, he is now free to add a bunch of the stuff from the LOTR appendices, as well as give a longer and richer interpretation of the movie. This movie is not going to read like the book, there will be added stuff from other sources now, in order to give a much richer understanding and view of the world and history The Hobbit and LOTR took place in. I can't understand how anyone who's read those books wouldn't be appreciative if not relieved to have the opportunity to see more of Middle Earth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.