Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Pasific Coluseum

Garrisson/Edler Chemistry Not the Same As Salo/Edler

58 posts in this topic

I thought Garrison was one of our best d-man last night.. which is pretty good for his first game in front of family and when our team played like crap

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we lose tonight we can start to panic and look forward to the Jones/Mackinnon sweepstakes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CDC should have a thread dedicated to counting the number of noob threads...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well obviously. They've only been playing on the same team for ONE game.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be laughing if this wasn't so pathetic.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An even bigger question mark is why didn't we draft Winnik? He's a real special player that makes everyone around him better. A real game breaker that can control the momentum and tempo of the game like nobody else in the league. At 265th overall, how did we let this guy slip through our fingers. No excuses, our drafting sucks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah its one game, I think it has the possibility to be pretty great. They should put Garrison on his off side though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Work.

I wish I was as cool as you with those big letters. Man, those are cool. You're cool.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you're the Sedins, chemistry doesn't come instantly, which is something we should all know.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then why did you say you should have watched that game instead if you were at work????????????????

Anyway. As it has been beaten to death in this thread, it has been 1 freaking game lol. I'm very quickly remembering why I stopped coming to this forum. 90% of it is dumb threads and posts like these.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought they looked good...

Garrison has the mobility that Salo lost with age - also, he has the physicality.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edler and Salo had some insane pairing chemistry. I watched the game last night and it's so apparent Garrisson and Edler are not meshing very well. Now it could take some time so I'm not going to tell the Canucks to switch pairings but this isn't looking as good as we thought when we signed the coveted Free Agent.

I like Garrissons shot on the Powerplay but I'm in no way enamored by his defensive game. Hate to say it but Salo might have been the better choice. Cheaper, Experienced, Good Chemistry & Just as good shot if not better than Jason!

Gillis dropped the ball big time not re-upping Sami.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought Garrison and Edler looked GREAT last night. Garrison especially.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly was wrong with them?

They were a -1 just like pretty much everyone else on the team. Edler had a 2 point game as well.

I didn't see any one thing as a weakness last night, other than maybe goaltending. The team defense as a whole just wasn't there though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.