Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Jordan schroeder


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
70 replies to this topic

#61 canacks1970

canacks1970

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,692 posts
  • Joined: 05-March 06

Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:30 PM

I haven't really been that high on Schoeder because of his size but he is starting to make me a believer. Whether he can handle the rough going in the playoffs remains to be seen.
When Kesler and Booth return we have cap problems as well as a glut of players. Everyone can't have a spot right now so Schroeder would be the logical player to send to the Wolves.....at least until a trade changes the landscape.



I don't beleive they have a cap issue this year Bluesman. Its still at 70.2 million. Its next year we have to worry about when it drops to 64.3.

Edited by canacks1970, 13 February 2013 - 01:34 PM.


#62 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,579 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:21 PM

I don't beleive they have a cap issue this year Bluesman. Its still at 70.2 million. Its next year we have to worry about when it drops to 64.3.

You're correct that there aren't any cap issues, both Kesler and Booth's cap hits are currently counting against the cap so we're already compliant. They were put on IR (injured Reserve) to free up roster spots for replacements, but they were never put on LTI (Long Term Injury, often called LTIR to combine LTI and IR) for a cap exemption beyond the $70.2M.

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

If this team lets go of Sang he will burn this team next year. 

 


#63 supermanbieksa

supermanbieksa

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 549 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 11

Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:36 PM

There is no reason to send him back down. He has proven everyone he's good enough to play with the big boys. If it doesn't work keeping him at the centre spot, put him on Keslers wing, 2nd line needs a playmaker and Shroeder could be the solution.

#64 hockeyville88

hockeyville88

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,553 posts
  • Joined: 24-October 06

Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:47 PM

Hosea Cheung@hosea24hours

"If Jordan (Schroeder) continues to play well, he's not going anywhere" - Gillis on Team 1040. #canucks


Posted Image
Sig credit: GoaltenderInterference. Thanks!

#65 Honky Cat

Honky Cat

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined: 16-May 10

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:05 PM

Eventually,you have to stand by your draft picks and let them develop..there's going to be ups and downs with any rookie....JS has already proven that he's ready for the NHL,what's the upside of sending him back to the AHL and bringing him back for the playoffs?

We may lose Ebbett,..but so be it.If we do get deep into the playoffs and injuries occur,I'd rather have a Jordan Schroeder with NHL experience than with minor league.

#66 Hugemanskost

Hugemanskost

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,382 posts
  • Joined: 31-December 09

Posted 13 February 2013 - 07:32 PM

I feel people are jumping too quickly to praise Schroeder. He has 4 points in 10 games. Over 82 games that's 33 points. Whoopdy doo! This is what a first round pick gets us?

It's way too early to say Schroeder's going to be a bomb or a star. When Kes and Booth get back, send Schroeder back to Chicago (cuz he doesn't have to clear waivers) and let him apply what he learned in The Show then come back next year and compete for a permanent spot on the big club.

Edited by Hugemanskost, 13 February 2013 - 07:32 PM.

webkit-fake-url://D8829558-F65F-49B9-9829-A7DFC7F2E6E4/application.pdf


:towel: :canucks:


#67 Erik Karlsson

Erik Karlsson

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,701 posts
  • Joined: 24-March 09

Posted 13 February 2013 - 07:35 PM

I feel people are jumping too quickly to praise Schroeder. He has 4 points in 10 games. Over 82 games that's 33 points. Whoopdy doo! This is what a first round pick gets us?

It's way too early to say Schroeder's going to be a bomb or a star. When Kes and Booth get back, send Schroeder back to Chicago (cuz he doesn't have to clear waivers) and let him apply what he learned in The Show then come back next year and compete for a permanent spot on the big club.


Why would we send him down, he hasn't had a goal scored on him and he makes something happen every time he touches the puck.

His first game shouldn't even count because of how nervous he was, he looks better every game and rarely makes a mistake.

The points will come, he was playing a 3rd line role the first couple games anyways, 33 points isn't bad for a rookie playing the 3rd line who is solid defensively.

m97o1w.jpg

Credit to Parise11


#68 Hugemanskost

Hugemanskost

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,382 posts
  • Joined: 31-December 09

Posted 13 February 2013 - 08:00 PM

Why would we send him down, he hasn't had a goal scored on him and he makes something happen every time he touches the puck.

His first game shouldn't even count because of how nervous he was, he looks better every game and rarely makes a mistake.

The points will come, he was playing a 3rd line role the first couple games anyways, 33 points isn't bad for a rookie playing the 3rd line who is solid defensively.


I would send him down because he is waiver eligible and because he will play 1st line minutes with the Wolves. The only other waiver exempt player the Canucks have on the roster is Tanev and he isn't going anywhere. If the club truly believe in the likes of Vopatti, Weise, Barker and Alberts, they won't waive them when Kes and Booth return. Why would they want to lose an asset? It's JShray and / or Tanev going down, unless they want to risk losing a depth player.

webkit-fake-url://D8829558-F65F-49B9-9829-A7DFC7F2E6E4/application.pdf


:towel: :canucks:


#69 CanucksJay

CanucksJay

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,478 posts
  • Joined: 19-January 12

Posted 13 February 2013 - 09:14 PM

I would send him down because he is waiver eligible and because he will play 1st line minutes with the Wolves. The only other waiver exempt player the Canucks have on the roster is Tanev and he isn't going anywhere. If the club truly believe in the likes of Vopatti, Weise, Barker and Alberts, they won't waive them when Kes and Booth return. Why would they want to lose an asset? It's JShray and / or Tanev going down, unless they want to risk losing a depth player.


couldnt they waive ebbett? do we need to waive another player?

#70 Hugemanskost

Hugemanskost

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,382 posts
  • Joined: 31-December 09

Posted 13 February 2013 - 09:19 PM

couldnt they waive ebbett? do we need to waive another player?


They could waive him but, if I'm not mistaken, he can be claimed. I might be wrong, though.

If we have 23 guys on the roster now, and Booth and Kes are coming back, we would need to waive 2 players or send down Tanev and Schroeder because they don't have to clear.

webkit-fake-url://D8829558-F65F-49B9-9829-A7DFC7F2E6E4/application.pdf


:towel: :canucks:


#71 Honky Cat

Honky Cat

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined: 16-May 10

Posted 13 February 2013 - 09:31 PM

I feel people are jumping too quickly to praise Schroeder. He has 4 points in 10 games. Over 82 games that's 33 points. Whoopdy doo! This is what a first round pick gets us?

It's way too early to say Schroeder's going to be a bomb or a star. When Kes and Booth get back, send Schroeder back to Chicago (cuz he doesn't have to clear waivers) and let him apply what he learned in The Show then come back next year and compete for a permanent spot on the big club.


Schroeder has shown great acceleration and vision...nobody is making him out to be the next Nial Yakupov....Ryan Kesler had 2 goals in his first 28 games,Henrik had 8 goals in his first 82 games.What kind of expectations did you have for a (late) first round draft pick?




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.