coryberg Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, Pickly said: Lol can’t believe Olli Juolevi’s Potential trade value has fallen to a has been rental player. If these rumours are true the writing is on the wall, he is a bust. Cant see benning trading him for a 3rd or 4th round pick (wayne Simmonds value). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, Pickly said: Lol can’t believe Olli Juolevi’s Potential trade value has fallen to a has been rental player. If these rumours are true the writing is on the wall, he is a bust. Yeah, maybe? Benning and his group know a lot more about Juolevi's status than any of us do. For all we know he may not become a good NHL player, but will be more of a project for a team that has the patience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 Hmmm let me try: Stetcher, Virtanen & Juolevi for Ristolainen & Johan Larsson. Larsson is actually a very nasty piece of business for those of you who aren't very familiar with him. Girgensons could be an interesting fit as well. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickly Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 Just now, NUCKER67 said: Yeah, maybe? Benning and his group know a lot more about Juolevi's status than any of us do. For all we know he may not become a good NHL player, but will be more of a project for a team that has the patience. This is what I mean. Clearly there is more to OJ and where he is at in his stage of development than we know. For all we know, the organization may view him a a borderline NHL defenceman if even that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickly Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 8 minutes ago, coryberg said: Cant see benning trading him for a 3rd or 4th round pick (wayne Simmonds value). What if the reality is that is what OJ is truly worth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 1 minute ago, Pickly said: What if the reality is that is what OJ is truly worth? When I think about who was available at #5: Matt Tkachuk Charlie McAvoy Mikhail Sergachev 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickly Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: When I think about who was available at #5: Matt Tkachuk Charlie McAvoy Mikhail Sergachev Fml. Don’t even start 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Glensky Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 11 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: When I think about who was available at #5: Matt Tkachuk Charlie McAvoy Mikhail Sergachev still makes me sick thinking about that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post aGENT Posted February 20, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 20, 2020 13 minutes ago, Pickly said: What if the reality is that is what OJ is truly worth? Even if that were true (it's not), We'd be better of keeping him than spending him on a couple months of washed up Simmonds. Friedman was talking out of his arse. Back off the ledge. 2 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 On insider trading the said Canucks have called Toronto about Tyson Barrie. They said TOR would want D back or picks/prospects to flip for a D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickly Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 29 minutes ago, aGENT said: Even if that were true (it's not), We'd be better of keeping him than spending him on a couple months of washed up Simmonds. Friedman was talking out of his arse. Back off the ledge. You don’t know that he’s just spewing BS though. Clearly where there’s smoke there’s fire. Maybe as fans we have to come to terms with the fact OJ isn’t going to pan out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Flipping stecher for barrie makes sense. Tor gets a rfa for a guy they lose. Maybe we add a conditional 3rd if Barrie signs in van Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Pickly said: You don’t know that he’s just spewing BS though. Clearly where there’s smoke there’s fire. Maybe as fans we have to come to terms with the fact OJ isn’t going to pan out Yes, I do. There's zero chance OJ was being discussed straight across for Simmonds. Friedman putting that out there as click bait for the web's most active NHL fanbase to do exactly what it did. Now, could Juolevi's name have come up in a package including Simmonds? Sure. But that's not what he put out there and that's not what people like you were talking about. Edited February 21, 2020 by aGENT 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 8 minutes ago, Outsiders said: On insider trading the said Canucks have called Toronto about Tyson Barrie. They said TOR would want D back or picks/prospects to flip for a D. We can’t re-sign Barrie as much as Toronto can’t. At least there is a shot Toffoli isn’t a pure rental, not much we should give up for Barrie knowing it is just for a couple months. Now that we will have Hughes playing 22-26 minutes a night, we don’t have a ton of cap/roster space for a player who has the same skill set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickly Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 1 minute ago, aGENT said: Yes, I do. There's zero chance OJ was being discussed straight across for Simmonds. Friedman putting that out there as click bait for the web's most active NHL fanbase to do exactly what it did. Now, could Juolevi's name have come up in a package including Simmonds? Sure. But that's not what he put out there and that's not what people like you were talking about. I’m glad Agent that you have the inside scoop on the NHL rumour mill to keep us peasant CDC posters in check 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Just now, Pickly said: I’m glad Agent that you have the inside scoop on the NHL rumour mill to keep us peasant CDC posters in check Has nothing to do with having an inside scoop. It has to do with having the ability to think critically and not fall for every little bit of click bait, self serving media types throw out there. Particularly during TDL frenzy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 I've spent too much time hating Toronto to view any of their roster as valuable. Who do we want if Stecher is rumored to go there? They say it's centered around Barrie, but that sounds more like a cap dump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 4 minutes ago, Provost said: We can’t re-sign Barrie as much as Toronto can’t. At least there is a shot Toffoli isn’t a pure rental, not much we should give up for Barrie knowing it is just for a couple months. Now that we will have Hughes playing 22-26 minutes a night, we don’t have a ton of cap/roster space for a player who has the same skill set. We can resign Barrie tho. Don't resign Tanev and solve the Loui situation. Sutter done cause only 1 yr left. Just got to be creative 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 5 minutes ago, Provost said: We can’t re-sign Barrie as much as Toronto can’t. At least there is a shot Toffoli isn’t a pure rental, not much we should give up for Barrie knowing it is just for a couple months. Now that we will have Hughes playing 22-26 minutes a night, we don’t have a ton of cap/roster space for a player who has the same skill set. We can sign barrie. Let tanev walk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 25 minutes ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said: We can sign barrie. Let tanev walk Excspt we already can’t re-sign Tanev as it stands, how would we afford a more expensive replacement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now