BigUncle16 Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Bieksa the token turnstile. Remind me again why this guy is even in the NHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ihatetomatoes Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 So when does Salo come back??? Thats 2 goals tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanofvan Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Those blaming Bieksa for the 3rd goal need to take off the hate glasses...looked to me like it was Hamhuis's check that scored while he was on all 4's looking for quarters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Bang Boogie Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Kopitar just tooled Bieksa making him look like a pylon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleednucksblue Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 The great Kevin Bieksa is at it again. What is he -7 tonight or what?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU SERIOUS Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 RU SERIOUS, on 15 October 2010 - 08:23 PM, said: QUICK !!! Sports action has a special side bet running during all Canucks games where you can bet on how many goals Bieksa will cause against the Canucks each game. Easy Money - if I ever saw it !!! ..Just made a $1000 on that screw-up by Bieksa on the second L.A. goal - Go Bieksa Go.......and don't come back !!! Keep watching the game - he'll destroy this game like the previous 3 for the Canucks. What a Rookie !!! \ ..there's another $1000 bucks. on another girly effort on that 3rd LA goal. Bieksa's a money machine for us...... keep losing games for us you sdack of $h1t Bieksa. Get ready for -40 deg Winnipeg weather. Wowwwww, Hold it - he just caused a 3rd goal on their 4th. Go Bieksa go ! Super loooser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ihatetomatoes Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Bah ha ^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperReverb2 Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Those blaming Bieksa for the 3rd goal need to take off the hate glasses...looked to me like it was Hamhuis's check that scored while he was on all 4's looking for quarters. If Bieksa hadn't chased the guy with the puck and played his position in front of the net it wouldn't have mattered what Hamhuis was doing or not doing. As soon as Bieksa got sucked into the "chase the guy with the puck" scenario Hamhuis was screwed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanofvan Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Please dont tell me you just quoted your own post....wow, special! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobopan Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Bieksa is always on the ice it seems.. WTF is wrong with AV. The Bieksa-Hamhuis pairing is now looking like a disaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoobydooby Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Those blaming Bieksa for the 3rd goal need to take off the hate glasses...looked to me like it was Hamhuis's check that scored while he was on all 4's looking for quarters. did you not notice how EASILY Bieksa'a check skated around him to be able to make that pass? you're right about Hamhuis, but Bieksa is at least half to blame for that play.. WEAK effort, really bad Feels like the displeasure with the Juice is justfied to me :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 for every goal they score i blame bieksa even if he's on the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanofvan Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 If Bieksa hadn't chased the guy with the puck and played his position in front of the net it wouldn't have mattered what Hamhuis was doing or not doing. As soon as Bieksa got sucked into the "chase the guy with the puck" scenario Hamhuis was screwed. Actually you're wrong. The goalie takes the shooter, while the defencemans job is to take away the pass. Although Bieksa got turned around, Kopitar was forced to a bad angle, a shot Luongo would have easily saved, which then forced a pass to Brown leading to an easy tap in due to Hamhuis not taking his man... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanofvan Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Bieksa is always on the ice it seems.. WTF is wrong with AV. The Bieksa-Hamhuis pairing is now looking like a disaster. Bieksa is always on the ice as the Canucks only have 5 d-men playing.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark Kent Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 did you not notice how EASILY Bieksa'a check skated around him to be able to make that pass? you're right about Hamhuis, but Bieksa is at least half to blame for that play.. WEAK effort, really bad Feels like the displeasure with the Juice is justfied to me :/ I'd say 60 Hamstring, 40 Bieksa. While Kopi did get the pass through, Bieksa kept him to the outside, where as Hamstrings man was open in front of the net. I don't know, well that's a lie someone is going to blame Bikesa for the last goal, BIeksa followed his man behind the net, and Alberts tried to join the party, leading to a big FAIL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanofvan Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 For the life of me, I can't figure out why people are focusing in on the play of Bieksa as the teams downfall when the team has scored 1, 2, 3, & 1 goal in their first 4 games. The second line has ZERO points and this include Kesler playing significant power play time. Sorry people, unless Lu can keep the goals below 2, this offence isnt going to cut it. To quote JR "WAKE UP" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackberries Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 I knew first pairing would bite us in the ass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunder Bunnies Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 I knew first pairing would bite us in the ass It was only Bieksa that bit us in the ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rising_ego Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 whoever even bothers defending Bieksa by now is just a troll and/or blind fool. anyone with any knowledge of the game can see how consistently bad, and stupid this player is. mark my words, in 3 yrs this guy will be out of the NHL because he's just a freak show on the ice, and has shown no sign of improvement. he's too stupid to change, fix his game and probably his attitude also. there's no point thinking of trading him, because no one, at least, no WINNER will bother taking this guy even for minimum value... especially as long as AV is the brainturd coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danny sedin Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Let's just say bieksa sucks and he makes mistakes at the wrong time and makes stupid pinches most of the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.