Would Barry Melrose or Pierre Mcguire be an outside the box approach coach?

[Pasific Coluseum]

I know the consensus is to go with either Eakins, Boucher, Tippet or Ruff but Gillis has done things not so ordinary during his tenure here. I'd love to see the Canucks interview a diverse crew of coaching candidates. Melrose had huge success with the Kings and Mcguire knows his "youknowwhat" when it comes to the game of hockey. He was Pens coach way back when.

I would actually like to see a coach who isn't being talked about to assume the new role. Even someone like Ted Nolan might do this team some real good. Take us to the promise land and win the whole shebang, ya know..

[Pears]

Pierre McGuire...

[oldnews]

Thanks for coming out P.C.

Note the pinned thread.

[Apples]

[ChenWei91]

[TheRussianRocket.]

[-Vintage Canuck-]

[NightHawkSniper]

I would've loved to have seen what would've happened if it was Mike Milbury as the losing player being approached...

[c00kies]

Didn't Melrose have an awful stint with the Lightning a few years ago? No thanks.

[Peaches]

I find it hard to take you seriously based on other threads you've made.

[DeNiro]

No that would be inside the box...

The LITTER BOX!

[Cpt_scary]

pierre as head coach+ glenn healy and pj stock as assistants+ mike milbury as gm=stanley cup

[CCF4E]

[Drouin]

Lol. McGuire .. -.-

[Relfk]

Since we're posting gifs...

[Edlerberry]

Nevermind McGuire, BARRY MELROSE? ARE YOU KIDDING?

He is the definition of horrible

[Captain Bob]

Please keep all new coach talk here: