Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Enter Search Term. Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. If no results appear, use Enter to do a full site search.
Forum Closure ×
Canucks Community
Forum Closure

CDSF: (2) St. Louis Blues vs (3) Chicago Blackhawks

-Vintage Canuck-

Who will win the series?  

90 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Del Rio Canucks Regular

Del Rio

Posted
Posted

I don't care what anyone says that Seabrook hit was a good clean hockey hit. Stupid call.

Seabrook clearly tucks his elbow in, so he doesn't elbow Backes. Seabrook's shoulder obviously will catch Backes near the head being Backes was lowered looking for the puck and Seabrook being like 2-3 inches taller..

The only way to avoid catching heads during hits, is to eliminate hitting completely. Not a chance in hell heads will never be caught in a hitting contact sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jack Fig Canucks All-Star

Jack Fig

Posted
Posted

I don't care what anyone says that Seabrook hit was a good clean hockey hit. Stupid call.

Seabrook clearly tucks his elbow in, so he doesn't elbow Backes. Seabrook's shoulder obviously will catch Backes near the head being Backes was lowered looking for the puck and Seabrook being like 2-3 inches taller..

The only way to avoid catching heads during hits, is to eliminate hitting completely. Not a chance in hell heads will never be caught in a hitting contact sport.

At first I thought it was okay, but looking at it further, the puck is 15 feet away from Backes when Seabrook unloads on him. If Backes was in the process of playing the puck, that same hit is legal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jiggs50 Canucks Star

Jiggs50

Posted
Posted

I don't care what anyone says that Seabrook hit was a good clean hockey hit. Stupid call.

Seabrook clearly tucks his elbow in, so he doesn't elbow Backes. Seabrook's shoulder obviously will catch Backes near the head being Backes was lowered looking for the puck and Seabrook being like 2-3 inches taller..

The only way to avoid catching heads during hits, is to eliminate hitting completely. Not a chance in hell heads will never be caught in a hitting contact sport.

You do realize the puck was about 5 feet away and Seabrook caught him with a high intentional hit..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Down by the River Canucks Franchise Player

Down by the River

Posted
Posted

I don't care what anyone says that Seabrook hit was a good clean hockey hit. Stupid call.

Seabrook clearly tucks his elbow in, so he doesn't elbow Backes. Seabrook's shoulder obviously will catch Backes near the head being Backes was lowered looking for the puck and Seabrook being like 2-3 inches taller..

The only way to avoid catching heads during hits, is to eliminate hitting completely. Not a chance in hell heads will never be caught in a hitting contact sport.

Then why are you here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
apollo Canucks Franchise Player

apollo

Posted
Posted

Fixed :) (although you are right, just thought I'd name the bigger POS)

I don't know about that man... I think they might equally be the biggest POS's in the universe.

Lappy was playing really strong ! Glad to see him do well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...