MikeyBoy44 Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 Nooooo don't take so many new people. Limit only to 2 max new people. After this game is over, everyone should Google how to play this game Lol. Or actually even right now. Proposal Mission 2.2 - JL - reject How about shedding light for us then? Link to comment
JohnLocke Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 How about shedding light for us then? I already said so. Generally with skilled players how it usually plays out: First round usually always passes regardless. Second round you take the same players plus yourself. Usually it fails then Then people discuss who might be it from the 4 players. It's a lot narrower than just throwing together random teams and hoping you don't get a spy. Link to comment
Aladeen Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 I already said so. Generally with skilled players how it usually plays out: First round usually always passes regardless. Second round you take the same players plus yourself. Usually it fails then Then people discuss who might be it from the 4 players. It's a lot narrower than just throwing together random teams and hoping you don't get a spy. Sounds so much like a spy wanting to sabotage 2 missions in a row. Why the hell would we include the same 3 players on the 2nd mission as the one that got sabotaged. Am I wrong in thinking that after that point we would have to have every mission succeed in order to win the game? (should this one also be sabotaged) I am starting to understand Krazz's little blurb about the spies winning the majority of the games. Maybe I am missing something about this game this obvious to everyone else but I just don't see how we are going to root out the spies at this point. Link to comment
Beluga Whale Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 Sounds so much like a spy wanting to sabotage 2 missions in a row. Why the hell would we include the same 3 players on the 2nd mission as the one that got sabotaged. Am I wrong in thinking that after that point we would have to have every mission succeed in order to win the game? (should this one also be sabotaged) I am starting to understand Krazz's little blurb about the spies winning the majority of the games. Maybe I am missing something about this game this obvious to everyone else but I just don't see how we are going to root out the spies at this point. I agree. Regardless of who is chosen, the chances of a spy getting on the mission is very high. Lets say 1 spy is in the group of MB, Dral and JL. Then there are 3 spies in the group of everyone else (7 players). If only 1 spy was on the first mission I figure there's less than a 5% chance that the no spy is selected for the next mission if it's purely random (which it pretty much is). How are we even supposed to win this? Link to comment
MikeyBoy44 Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 As far as I can tell it will all be in the chatter. Link to comment
JohnLocke Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 Sounds so much like a spy wanting to sabotage 2 missions in a row. Why the hell would we include the same 3 players on the 2nd mission as the one that got sabotaged. Am I wrong in thinking that after that point we would have to have every mission succeed in order to win the game? (should this one also be sabotaged) I am starting to understand Krazz's little blurb about the spies winning the majority of the games. Maybe I am missing something about this game this obvious to everyone else but I just don't see how we are going to root out the spies at this point. I didn't say include the 3 that failed. That's if the first mission passes. This is hard to explain. You guys are all invited to my house and we can play a few rounds of avalon face to face and you will get it Link to comment
Aladeen Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 I didn't say include the 3 that failed. That's if the first mission passes. This is hard to explain. You guys are all invited to my house and we can play a few rounds of avalon face to face and you will get it I'm already in the bushes outside of your bedroom window so I guess I could come in for a game. Link to comment
JohnLocke Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 I'm already in the bushes outside of your bedroom window so I guess I could come in for a game. I'm on the second floor. Come up! Bring some hookers and blow. Link to comment
otherwise Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 Proposal Mission 2.2 - otherwise - Approved Link to comment
Krazz Posted June 13, 2015 Author Share Posted June 13, 2015 Sounds so much like a spy wanting to sabotage 2 missions in a row. Why the hell would we include the same 3 players on the 2nd mission as the one that got sabotaged. Am I wrong in thinking that after that point we would have to have every mission succeed in order to win the game? (should this one also be sabotaged) I am starting to understand Krazz's little blurb about the spies winning the majority of the games. Maybe I am missing something about this game this obvious to everyone else but I just don't see how we are going to root out the spies at this point. It's hard, but it's not undoable. When you are Resistance, the satisfaction when you win the game is pure bliss. As a side note, just a friendly reminder: An asterisk (*) indicates that two Failure Votes in the Mission Vote phase is required to fail the mission, when normally only one is required. Things should be easier for the Resistance if they manage to make it to Missions 4 and 5. Keep in mind that these two particular missions will require at least two Sabotage votes from the Spies, meaning at least two spies must be on the mission. In other words, if the Resistance manage to root out a Spy or two during early/mid-game, they should have this in the bag by late-game (if they last that long). Link to comment
Master Mind Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 I already said so. Generally with skilled players how it usually plays out: First round usually always passes regardless. Second round you take the same players plus yourself. Usually it fails then Then people discuss who might be it from the 4 players. It's a lot narrower than just throwing together random teams and hoping you don't get a spy. That is usually how it goes. I almost never see the first mission fail, it's easier to stay hidden as a spy if there are 4 people in question instead of 3. Proposal Mission 2.2 - Aladeen - approvedI know it's not gonna pass but I think this is the best chance at the mission succeeding. We have to be careful though I think the spies may be rejecting this because there are no spies on this mission. Then why approve of a mission you think will fail? Link to comment
Beluga Whale Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Gbassi, who would you take on your mission? I'm not sure about the players on this one, but I don't want to reject in case yours is worse. Link to comment
Master Mind Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Proposal Mission 2.2 - dral - reject tough to say about Aladeen, he's just so bad at reading me, or maybe he is mafia scum and just playing it up... 50% chance MB44 is mafia as well, so yeah, not feeling good about this at all Considering you've rejected all 3 (despite being right to do so on the 1st and likely the 2nd), who would your choice team be? Link to comment
g_bassi13 Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Gbassi, who would you take on your mission? I'm not sure about the players on this one, but I don't want to reject in case yours is worse. You, Mikeyboy, and a wildcard for now. Link to comment
Aladeen Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 That is usually how it goes. I almost never see the first mission fail, it's easier to stay hidden as a spy if there are 4 people in question instead of 3. Then why approve of a mission you think will fail?I mean I don't think it's going to be approved, because all the people who I think are spies are rejecting it. I don't think this mission will be sabotaged if that is what you are asking. Link to comment
Dral Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Considering you've rejected all 3 (despite being right to do so on the 1st and likely the 2nd), who would your choice team be? either Aladeen is missing a lot about this game or he's mafia... I dunno, JL is also kinda quiet to be helpful, I'm actually leaning towards him being the one who fracked up the mission - if he's played before I'd expect him to be more helpful like you Link to comment
Beluga Whale Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 You, Mikeyboy, and a wildcard for now. I would take Pineapples along with that group. I think he's been pretty helpful and if he was a spy he could easily keep quiet and let us fail. Also, I agree that I think MB the least likely to be a spy from the original group. Link to comment
Beluga Whale Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 either Aladeen is missing a lot about this game or he's mafia... I dunno, JL is also kinda quiet to be helpful, I'm actually leaning towards him being the one who fracked up the mission - if he's played before I'd expect him to be more helpful like you What's mafia? Link to comment
Master Mind Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 I mean I don't think it's going to be approved, because all the people who I think are spies are rejecting it. I don't think this mission will be sabotaged if that is what you are asking. It was, so that makes sense now. I don't have a read on Dr.strangelove so I'm 50/50 on this, but since there was a rejection by the person I'm most confident is a spy, I'll have to approve this. Proposal Mission 2.2 - Pineapples - Approved Link to comment
Aladeen Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 either Aladeen is missing a lot about this game or he's mafia... I dunno, JL is also kinda quiet to be helpful, I'm actually leaning towards him being the one who fracked up the mission - if he's played before I'd expect him to be more helpful like you you're so full of crap Dral we all know it was you who sabotaged the first mission, and are rejecting this one because there are no spies that were picked for it. Here's dral's crapty plan in a nutshell; 1) Reject the first mission, one that he is on, after it has been all but approved. 2)claim that the mission will fail and that he will be telling us all so after the mission. 3)sabotages mission then says I told you so. 4) rejects any mission his spies are not on 5) attacks anyone who sees through his crappy plan. (In other words tries say I am a spy or have no concept of how to play this game because I see what he is) 6) sits back being useless as he is in mafia and hopes to coast to win. Did I leave anything out Dral? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.