Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

It's the industrial economy that is destroying the world


Heretic

Recommended Posts

This is really interesting and mind boggling how we have been brainwashed into thinking what we have to do as individuals to save the planet...

"Forget Shorter Showers

Jordan Brown 2015 11:22

Would any sane person think dumpster diving would have stopped Hitler, or that composting would have ended slavery or brought about the eight-hour workday; or that chopping wood and carrying water would have gotten people out of Tsarist prisons; or that dancing around a fire would have helped put in place the Voting Rights Act of 1957 or the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Then why now, with all the world at stake, do so many people retreat into these entirely personal “solutions”? Why are these “solutions” not sufficient? But most importantly, what can be done instead to actually stop the murder of the planet?"

Watch the following 11 and a half min video:

http://thoughtmaybe.com/forget-shorter-showers/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had problems playing the video.

Not that I didn't enjoy looking at the background of a man in the shower with a towel on, spraying water toward the ceiling with a ****-eating grin on his face. I thought to myself, this man has the look of someone who knows what's going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would any sane person think dumpster diving would have stopped Hitler, or that composting would have ended slavery or brought about the eight-hour workday; or that chopping wood and carrying water would have gotten people out of Tsarist prisons; or that dancing around a fire would have helped put in place the Voting Rights Act of 1957 or the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Then why now, with all the world at stake, do so many people retreat into these entirely personal solutions? Why are these solutions not sufficient? But most importantly, what can be done instead to actually stop the murder of the planet?"

The commies stopped Hitler.

The 8hr work day was a Karl Marx idea.

The tsarist autocracy was dismantled by you know who.

And voting rights? Civil rights? That's anti-establishment!

Wait... Is this Red? Oh no!

The reason that socialism has been branded so darkly by our owners isn't because the ideas were bad. It's because they weren't in-line with the goals of the establishment.

It takes a movement to create change. A large one. These movements should be easier to come about with the internet and social media, but that's why the owners have taken control of both and have devised laws to fight dissent, downplay movements, infiltrate and spy on the civilianry.

Also, there's a neverending battle against the unification of a movement. We're constantly and bitterly being divided on every issue under the sun, from social issues, to the environment, to the economy, etc. "Oh, the economy. We cannot possibly change status quo because of the economy." So say our owners.

A prime example is the media's coverage of Bernie Sanders. Instead of being informed of real issues, Americans are being bombarded on a daily basis by the Donald Trump racist brigade. Establishment's way to divide Americans even further while maintaining the idea that the establishment is actually on their side.

Still, people who actually care about the issues that affect them are out there, and they are massing. So I'm not sure what's better for the establishment. Fighting it all the way until it erupts into a large-scale revolution? Or taking little steps to appease the masses while maintaining their established order?

PS. The establishment WILL profit huge on upcoming green movement. Of that I have no doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of these "establishments" are merely the manifestation of our collective actions. Large corporations are franchised and publicly traded. We use our dollars to vote for which ones are successful. I'd agree that technological advancement will likely do more for the environment than all of the compost boxes combined. However, that doesn't mean that individuals aren't responsible for what their society does as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, there's a neverending battle against the unification of a movement. We're constantly and bitterly being divided on every issue under the sun, from social issues, to the environment, to the economy, etc. "Oh, the economy. We cannot possibly change status quo because of the economy." So say our owners.

The grand script in full effect. The misdirection of everyone's thoughts and ideals to promote fear and consumption of what ever the government wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of these "establishments" are merely the manifestation of our collective actions. Large corporations are franchised and publicly traded. We use our dollars to vote for which ones are successful. I'd agree that technological advancement will likely do more for the environment than all of the compost boxes combined. However, that doesn't mean that individuals aren't responsible for what their society does as a whole.

This is why corporate support for the coming green movement will come as no surprise to me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...