Ojibwa72 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 To get younger and have cap space opinions on this please: To Tampa - Burrows To Van - Drouin To Winnipeg - Hamhuis and Vrbata To Van - Ladd & Morrisey As I said Thoughts and comments please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nd1989 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 lol sorry but this is really bad.. vancouver would be lucky to get anything beyond a 3rd round pick for burrows, and hammer and vrby wouldnt get us ladd, let alone ladd and a good d prospect like morrisey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 After Tampa makes that trade they will realize that they have a 16M cap hit for less than 50 points combined of Burrows, Callahan and Carle. Meanwhile Winnipeg will be chomping at the bit trying to acquire two rentals and trade their best D prospect despite being in the basement with no shot at making the playoffs. Sorry but it just seems like you put no thought into this because had you done so, you would not have posted this abomination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 I don't even.... .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ojibwa72 Posted February 19, 2016 Author Share Posted February 19, 2016 19 minutes ago, Toews said: After Tampa makes that trade they will realize that they have a 16M cap hit for less than 50 points combined of Burrows, Callahan and Carle. Meanwhile Winnipeg will be chomping at the bit trying to acquire two rentals and trade their best D prospect despite being in the basement with no shot at making the playoffs. Sorry but it just seems like you put no thought into this because had you done so, you would not have posted this abomination. if you're going to swing swing for the fences. Moreover I would say Edler and Vrbata but of course the swedes have set up shop in Vancouver and you can't get them out it seems. With Byfuglien locked up Ladd needs out and Morrisey is the best option to shop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ojibwa72 Posted February 19, 2016 Author Share Posted February 19, 2016 22 minutes ago, Toews said: After Tampa makes that trade they will realize that they have a 16M cap hit for less than 50 points combined of Burrows, Callahan and Carle. Meanwhile Winnipeg will be chomping at the bit trying to acquire two rentals and trade their best D prospect despite being in the basement with no shot at making the playoffs. Sorry but it just seems like you put no thought into this because had you done so, you would not have posted this abomination. Tampa's problem is not my problem. You want younger right. That is the trend here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Soldier Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 3 minutes ago, Ojibwa72 said: Tampa's problem is not my problem. You want younger right. That is the trend here. Is it when you're proposing making a trade with them. Bad thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigs Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Get it into your head, neither Winnipeg nor Tampa will do either of these trades. Extreme overpayment by both clubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 39 minutes ago, Ojibwa72 said: if you're going to swing swing for the fences. Moreover I would say Edler and Vrbata but of course the swedes have set up shop in Vancouver and you can't get them out it seems. With Byfuglien locked up Ladd needs out and Morrisey is the best option to shop. The only way you could convince either team this was good value back for what they give us is to use some kind of hypno-bat. We give up ageing players who are either poor value for their contracts or pending-UFAs and get back young, top end talent. Don't get me wrong, I'd love it if both teams accepted, but those are terrible proposals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Goblin Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 1 hour ago, Ojibwa72 said: To get younger and have cap space opinions on this please: To Tampa - Burrows To Van - Drouin To Winnipeg - Hamhuis and Vrbata To Van - Ladd & Morrisey As I said Thoughts and comments please. Nice troll job... Couldn't you at least back up your trades proposals with reasons as to why this would benefit the teams involved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNeil Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Okay this is one of the worst in awhile. The Tampa trade is garbage.....Burrows has a bad contract, it would be hard to even trade him, never mind for a top prospect. The Winnipeg trade is even worse. Winnipeg won't make the playoffs this year. Why on earth would they be the team that wants Hamhuis and Vrbata as rentals, and are willing to pay us more than actual playoff teams. Its hard to believe this was a serious proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 *Face palm* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocksterh8 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Some ppl are better off just reading these instead of posting. nuf said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 If we could do this is would happen,but no way ever will this ever happen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Did you try this in NHL 16? But even in there, the computer GM's wouldn't accept this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ojibwa72 Posted February 22, 2016 Author Share Posted February 22, 2016 All I see is negativity yet no one has discussed anything. As I said yes it may be bad however it is an idea. Winnipeg has cap space and Tampa has a problem child. Change of scenery can do wonders for people. If Winnipeg can resign both Hamhuis and Vrbata, then next year they could be a contender. You call it rental I call it future. As for Burrows well he would go to a contender which might actually light a spark under him again. His best ability has always been his defensive game yet he seems to have even strayed from that now so now we are left with someone who can't score and is lacking defensively. Just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notafan Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I'm probably going to get a lot of flack over this one, but here goes: Virbata to Pittsburgh for Sundqvist (C) + 2nd (2016) Burrows to Washington for Latta (RW) + 3rd (2016) Higgins + Vey + Weber to Boston for Breen (D) + Irwin (D) + 3rd (2016) Hansen + Bartkowski to NY Rangers for Yandle (D) + 4th (2016) Jones + Zalewski to NY Islanders for Martin (LW) + 7th (2016) Biega + 4th (2016 via NY RANGERS) to Columbus for Heatherington (D) + 5th (2016) Kennis + 5th (2016 via COLUMBUS) to Colorado for Redmond (D) + 7th (2017) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 8 hours ago, notafan said: I'm probably going to get a lot of flack over this one, but here goes: Virbata to Pittsburgh for Sundqvist (C) + 2nd (2016) Burrows to Washington for Latta (RW) + 3rd (2016) Higgins + Vey + Weber to Boston for Breen (D) + Irwin (D) + 3rd (2016) Hansen + Bartkowski to NY Rangers for Yandle (D) + 4th (2016) Jones + Zalewski to NY Islanders for Martin (LW) + 7th (2016) Biega + 4th (2016 via NY RANGERS) to Columbus for Heatherington (D) + 5th (2016) Kennis + 5th (2016 via COLUMBUS) to Colorado for Redmond (D) + 7th (2017) No flack from me. These are much better than the OP's. Personally, I would rather have Hansen over Yandle but that's just me. I would definitely do the Pittsburgh and Washington ones if they were game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notafan Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 UPDATE: Hamhuis to LA for Cernak + 3rd (2016) Hansen + Bartkowski + 3rd (via BOSTON) to Dallas for Demers (D) + Ritchie (RW) + 5th (2017) Biega + 7th (2016 via NY ISLANDERS) to Columbus for Heatherington (D) + 6th (2016) Kenins + 6th (2016 via COLUMBUS) to Colorado for Redmond (D) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notafan Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Say for argument, all trades occur, this is what the Canucks lineup could look like the after the deadline: SEDIN, D SEDIN, H. SUTTER, B. VIRTANEN, J BAERTSCHI, S. HORVAT, B VIRTANEN, J. ETEM, E. MARTIN, M. GRANLUND, M. ETEM, E. LATTA, M DORSETT, D. McCANN, J LATTA, M. CRACKNELL, A. CRACKNELL, A. SUNDQVIST, O. EDLER, A. TANEV, C. HUTTON, B HUTTON, B. DEMERS, J. SBISA, L. SBISA, L. REDMOND, Z. PEDAN, A. PEDAN, A. IRWIN, M. MILLER, R. MARKSTROM, J. * Players in RED indicate injury replacement of EDLER, A/SUTTER, B.. and re-alignment of lines/pairings. ** Have increased depth with: - CERNAK, E. (D) - 18 6-3 203 - SUNDQVIST, O. (C/W) - 21 6-3 209 - BREEN, C. (D) - 26 6-7 224 - IRWIN, M. (D) - 28 6-2 210 - HEATHERINGTON, D. (D) - 20 6-3 196 *** Replacents: - MARTIN, M. (LW/RW) - 26 6-3 215 - GRANLUND, M. (C) - 22 5-11 185 - LATTA, M. (RW/C) - 24 6-0 209 - DEMERS, J. (D) - 27 6-1 195 - REDMOND, Z. (D) - 27 6-2 205 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.