Alflives Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Just now, nickels said: I wouldn't be surprised if discussing Tanev and Virtanen for 8th and Kane. If Kane would agree to extension around 5yrs x 5.5-6m would probably make this deal. I was thinking along those lines as well. Really, in this draft, are 5 + 8 worse than 3 + 5? Plus, we add Kane, who would fit in right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 1 hour ago, Rush17 said: Kuzma: Benning needs to play hardball with teams on Tanev http://www.tsn.ca/radio/vancouver-1040-i-1410/kuzma-benning-needs-to-play-hardball-with-teams-on-tanev-1.772768 Glad to see others are starting to see the light -- the 3OA is the starting point of discussions, NOT adding TO Tanev. Kuzma even suggested (as I have) that it could take both their firsts this year, and I'd add probably even a prospect like Johns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Getting waaaaay ahead of myself but if we get 3 and 5 do we go: Heiskanen and Mittelstadt/Glass/Necas or Villardi and Makar/Liljegren? assuming Villardi/Heiskanen go 3/4 which seems to be the way the wind is blowing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 2 minutes ago, ilduce39 said: Getting waaaaay ahead of myself but if we get 3 and 5 do we go: Heiskanen and Mittelstadt/Glass/Necas or Villardi and Makar/Liljegren? assuming Villardi/Heiskanen go 3/4 which seems to be the way the wind is blowing. Vilardi + Makar or Vilardi + Heiskanen depending on who goes 4th. But you nab Viladri first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckswincup8 Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 If canucks get 3 and 5, Vilardi is a must for one of the pick Vilardi at 3. at 5 pick your player: Pettersson Mittelstadt Makar Glass Necas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 32 minutes ago, Hutton Wink said: Glad to see others are starting to see the light -- the 3OA is the starting point of discussions, NOT adding TO Tanev. Kuzma even suggested (as I have) that it could take both their firsts this year, and I'd add probably even a prospect like Johns. wow! That would be a real haul and absolutely help the end result of our rebuild to be a more competitive team. What about Buffalo giving up Kane + 8th overall for Tanev? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 I just hope we dont have to give any of our seconds away. Tanev alone should be enough to bring in 3rd overall and the 29th in a subpar draft. If it does happen it will most likely build from that. I think Benning will push for no second to be included. Van: 3rd overall, 29th overall and Johns or Oleksiak Dallas: Tanev, 33rd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 3 minutes ago, KKnight said: I just hope we dont have to give any of our seconds away. Tanev alone should be enough to bring in 3rd overall and the 29th in a subpar draft. If it does happen it will most likely build from that. I think Benning will push for no second to be included. Van: 3rd overall, 29th overall and Johns or Oleksiak Dallas: Tanev, 33rd I think we will take back Niemi too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobi Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 I can't imagine DAL would give both 3OA AND 29th pick. I'd be super happy if that were to happen and I'd worship the ground that JB walks on but realistically, I doubt DAL would do it even if the Canucks were to take one of their goalies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 2 minutes ago, gobi said: I can't imagine DAL would give both 3OA AND 29th pick. I'd be super happy if that were to happen and I'd worship the ground that JB walks on but realistically, I doubt DAL would do it even if the Canucks were to take one of their goalies. 3 OA + 29 OA + Niemi for Tanev + Gaunce? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 3 hours ago, timberz21 said: Agree, but again if Tanev's FMV is $100, our strong position will allow us to maybe get $110, $115 for Tanev. Not $500 like some are suggesting with Reinhart, D. Strome, or straight-up the 3rd overall. It can pay off to wait longer, or it could backfire like Kesler and Luongo. If Tanev gets injured and misses 40-50 games next year, his stock will drop significantly as he's already starting to get a reputation of an injury-prone player, after that it would be pretty much confirmed. It's a gamble. 3rd OA is not that high in value, not in this draft anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainLinden16 Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 37 minutes ago, ilduce39 said: Getting waaaaay ahead of myself but if we get 3 and 5 do we go: Heiskanen and Mittelstadt/Glass/Necas or Villardi and Makar/Liljegren? assuming Villardi/Heiskanen go 3/4 which seems to be the way the wind is blowing. I like Vilardi and Glass at 3# and 5#. Sutter is a much better RW, and he can still take face-offs. Liljegren is probably someone that gets picked 8-15. I really like him, but I would rather have Vilardi and Glass. Heiskanen is 2-3 years away with his small frame which is fine given our timeframe, but I think Jim has to think about JIm this year. The fan base won't be happy with another top pick that doesn't play in the NHL for another 2-3 years. Makar is a definite no go on a team that doesn't have high end offensive skill. He will be stuck in his own zone and get hurt with his small frame. That's a recipe for disaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobi Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 29 minutes ago, Alflives said: 3 OA + 29 OA + Niemi for Tanev + Gaunce? I doubt DAL would be interested in Gaunce. I think DAL would want to hold on to at least one of the picks in the first round. But what do I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Screw Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 I would take two centers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 1 hour ago, Alflives said: 3 OA + 29 OA + Niemi for Tanev + Gaunce? I would think it would probably work out to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 1 hour ago, Alflives said: 3 OA + 29 OA + Niemi for Tanev + Gaunce? Alf who would you take in that case? 3rd 5th 29th 33rd 55th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Screw Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 25 minutes ago, KKnight said: Alf who would you take in that case? 3rd- Vilardi 5th-Glass 29th- Rasmussen *Betting he falls 33rd-Timmins 55th- Samberg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainLinden16 Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 26 minutes ago, KKnight said: Alf who would you take in that case? 3rd 5th 29th 33rd 55th if we have 29,33,55 I sure hope that gets rolled into 3 becoming 1 and 5 becoming 2. I will take quality over quantity any day. I know the quality part is highly questionable according to most, but I for what it is worth I still see the top 2 being the highest potential players in this draft. Whether or not they live up to that remains to be seen, but I do think they have the highest ceilings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 3 hours ago, nickels said: I wouldn't be surprised if discussing Tanev and Virtanen for 8th and Kane. If Kane would agree to extension around 5yrs x 5.5-6m ...would probably make this deal. Yep and the 8th is close to the same as the 3rd. All of the experts say that #3-15 could go in any order really width no one really standing over the other. With 3rd OA you get to take a particular guy you are in love with, or be there to snap up Patrick if he falls because someone wanted a D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobi Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 53 minutes ago, KKnight said: I would think it would probably work out to that. I'd take that and run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.