Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Finally dawned on me why we let Gaudette go for so little in return

Rate this topic


Harold27k

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, wallstreetamigo said:

More like $&!#ty cap management for years happened. Relying on the cap to increase every year is just stupid. 

We had cap to re-sign him before the pandemic despite "$&!#ty cap management". We didn't after. 

  • Cheers 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, aGENT said:

We had cap to re-sign him before the pandemic despite "$&!#ty cap management". We didn't after. 

We had the cap either way other than Benning:

 

1. Relied on a huge cap increase, and

2. Prioritized trying to get OEL and his horrible contract and signing Holtby and Virtanen.

3. Could not find any way to move out one of his many terrible contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toffoli and Gaudette would help this team far more than any of the plugs and fillers and overpriced vets Benning seems to be in love with.

 

This team can't score or even generate good chances consistently.

 

The minute he signed Pearson the Toffoli screw up looked even worse.

  • RoughGame 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said:

Toffoli and Gaudette would help this team far more than any of the plugs and fillers and overpriced vets Benning seems to be in love with.

 

This team can't score or even generate good chances consistently.

 

The minute he signed Pearson the Toffoli screw up looked even worse.

To you maybe... not to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wallstreetamigo said:

Toffoli and Gaudette would help this team far more than any of the plugs and fillers and overpriced vets Benning seems to be in love with.

 

This team can't score or even generate good chances consistently.

 

The minute he signed Pearson the Toffoli screw up looked even worse.

Gaudette trending at -32 / 82 game season

not really crying about that guy leaving

Toff yes

 

but Holy Moly the Goalie does our bottom six ever look identical right now

what is that saying about trying the same thing over and over again?

Ol' Jimmer has identified what our bottom six will look like, just has not decided which pieces he likes best

5'11" 188, 0-0-0-2--21 its the perfect formula

 

Tyler Motte C 24 6 3 9 14 0 1995-03-10 25 St. Clair, MI 5.10 192

 

Antoine Roussel L 35 1 3 4 37 4 1989-11-21 30 Roubaix, France 5.11 199
                           
13 Jayce Hawryluk C 21 1 1 2 9 -4 1996-01-01 24 Yorkton, SASK 5.11 196
                           
                           
                           
                           
44 Tyler Graovac C 5 0 0 0 0 -1 1993-04-27 27 Brampton, ONT 6.05 208
56 Marc Michaelis L 8 0 0 0 2 -3 1995-07-31 25 Mannheim, Germany 5.11 187
15 Matthew Highmore C 9 0 0 0 2 -2 1996-02-27 24 Halifax, NS 5.11 188
72 Travis Boyd C 10 0 0 0 0 -4 1993-09-14 26 Hopkins, MN 6.00 190
24 Jimmy Vesey L 11 0 0 0 0 -7 1993-05-26 27 Boston, MA 6.03 202
                           

 

 

clearly Gro and Vesey are too tall

Rooster is a + player 

so they are out

Motte scores too much, must be a top 6er

 

Edited by lmm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wallstreetamigo said:

Pearson at 3.25 or Toffoli at 4.25. Its not even a comparison at this point. 

 

I immediately dismiss the opinion of anyone who cannot admit that.

Admit what?

Edited by spur1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, aGENT said:

The plan was to re-sign him.

 

Then a global pandemic happened.

Every other team had to deal with the pandemic.

 

The difference with the Canucks is they had no cushion at all due to Benning's poor management.

  • Thanks 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, spur1 said:

Admit what?

That chasing OEL to the point of letting Toffoli walk (without even really talking to him or his agent) and then conpounding it by re-signing Pearson to the same total term for a million less and Virtanen as well was a seriously bad set of decisions by Benning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said:

That chasing OEL to the point of letting Toffoli walk (without even really talking to him or his agent) and then conpounding it by re-signing Pearson to the same total term for a million less and Virtanen as well was a seriously bad set of decisions by Benning.

What the heck does Pearson and his contract for next year have to do with not signing TT?

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, spur1 said:

What the heck does Pearson and his contract for next year have to do with not signing TT?

Had he signed Toffoli, with the emergence of Hoglander this year, Pearson would not have been necessary in the top 6 and as such they could have traded him or signed him to a contract more in line with 2 of his last 3 years of 3rd line level production and being decidedly average at anything rather than ignoring those 2 years and signing him based on last years career year.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said:

Had he signed Toffoli, with the emergence of Hoglander this year, Pearson would not have been necessary in the top 6 and as such they could have traded him or signed him to a contract more in line with 2 of his last 3 years of 3rd line level production and being decidedly average at anything rather than ignoring those 2 years and signing him based on last years career year.

but but but he is a glue guy

Jimmy can't trade a glue guy

the team would fall apart

Edited by lmm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lmm said:

but but but he is a glue guy

Jimmy can't trade a glue guy

The problem is Pearson as a 3 year solution actually just holds back Horvat from centering a true scoring line. Pearson is an ok player but severely streaky offensively.

 

If this is what they want Horvat to be, then find a couple of talented wingers to put in the top 6, split up EP and Miller to center the top 2, and use Horvat as the shutdown 3C.

 

Its a waste of Horvat really. 

 

Miller-EP-Podkolzin

Hoglander-Horvat-Boeser

Pearson-3C-Lind

 

Or some version of this with an actual elite defensive 3rd line center would give those top 2 lines more chance to create offense.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lmm said:

but but but he is a glue guy

Jimmy can't trade a glue guy

The problem is Pearson as a 3 year solution actually just holds back Horvat from centering a true scoring line. Pearson is an ok player but severely streaky offensively.

 

If this is what they want Horvat to be, then find a couple of talented wingers to put in the top 6, split up EP and Miller to center the top 2, and use Horvat as the shutdown 3C.

 

Its a waste of Horvat really. 

 

Miller-EP-Podkolzin

Hoglander-Horvat-Boeser

Pearson-3C-Lind

 

Or some version of this with an actual elite defensive 3rd line center would give those top 2 lines more chance to create offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said:

The problem is Pearson as a 3 year solution actually just holds back Horvat from centering a true scoring line. Pearson is an ok player but severely streaky offensively.

 

If this is what they want Horvat to be, then find a couple of talented wingers to put in the top 6, split up EP and Miller to center the top 2, and use Horvat as the shutdown 3C.

 

Its a waste of Horvat really. 

 

Miller-EP-Podkolzin

Hoglander-Horvat-Boeser

Pearson-3C-Lind

 

Or some version of this with an actual elite defensive 3rd line center would give those top 2 lines more chance to create offense.

I don't think Pearson or Lind are fast enough to be elite shut down guys

and Podkolzin probably bolts like every other Russian to play here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wallstreetamigo said:

Had he signed Toffoli, with the emergence of Hoglander this year, Pearson would not have been necessary in the top 6 and as such they could have traded him or signed him to a contract more in line with 2 of his last 3 years of 3rd line level production and being decidedly average at anything rather than ignoring those 2 years and signing him based on last years career year.

Nice fantasy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, *Buzzsaw* said:

Every other team had to deal with the pandemic.

 

The difference with the Canucks is they had no cushion at all due to Benning's poor management.

It’s a great excuse for anything these days. 
 

Why did you sleep with my sister? 
 

Pandemic. 
 

Why are you chasing me with a splitting maul?

 

Pandemic buddy. Stand still.

 

Where did you just shove that pen?

 

Pandemic, ma’am. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...