Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Proposal] Van Chi


Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Nucklefuts said:

DeBrincat

 

Boeser & 1st

Why would we make a trade as bad as the one the Hawks did to get Seth Jones?  Would we then grossly overpay Debrinksmurf too, like the Hawks did with Jones?  

Hawks are in the dumpster, and let’s leave them there - which is funny. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nucklefuts said:

For a 1st line player and a 1st round pick. 

They're entering a complete rebuild. Would you do that with a 25 year old, mostly likely overpaid, inconsistent, injury prone player?

 

And the 1st round pick. I wouldn't mind parting with that if we hadn't traded away so many early picks the last 2 years.

 

Chicago is said to be seeking "a young player, high draft picks, and top prospects". So we're probably out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Alflives said:

Why would we make a trade as bad as the one the Hawks did to get Seth Jones?  Would we then grossly overpay Debrinksmurf too, like the Hawks did with Jones?  

Hawks are in the dumpster, and let’s leave them there - which is funny. 

The fact you think it's an over pay and the other guy thinks it's an under pay means it's probly a good trade. 

 

You're welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nucklefuts said:

The fact you think it's an over pay and the other guy thinks it's an under pay means it's probly a good trade. 

 

You're welcome.

Don’t want any player from the Hawks.  Terrible team.  :sick:

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Nucklefuts said:

DeBrincat

 

Boeser & 1st

OMG never make this trade?? DeBrincat 24, 5'8 -- last 2 season point a game player avg 35 G.... 

Would never trade another 1st rounder and Boeser Never never... Try and workout new contract 3 yr X AAV 6.6 million

We need more grit and speed and make cap room..DeBrincat will be demanding big contract summer 2023-- 6 yr X 8 million

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Nucklefuts said:

The fact you think it's an over pay and the other guy thinks it's an under pay means it's probly a good trade. 

 

You're welcome.

If you're referring to me. I didn't say it was an underpay. I said WTF would Chicago do this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, King Heffy said:

I like DeBrincat but I'd be more interested in Dach if he's actually available.

He apparently is but not sure Vancouver can pay the futures Chicago are looking for in return.  Chicago is in a full scale rebuild with Davidson suggesting that it could last 5 years or more - says they will take the necessary time to get it right.

 

Everyone is for sale for futures.  DeBrincat, who is younger than Boeser and has hit 40 goals is considered too old for their rebuild.  Hagel was 23 when they traded him at the TLD for 2x 1sts.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Elias Pettersson said:

Didn't JR say he wanted to get bigger?  If so, why would we trade for a guy who is smaller than Garland?

The only forward on Canucks with more hits than DeBrincat at 101 was Miller with 172.  Look at DeBrincat's stats:  41g, 37 a, 28 ppp, 101 hits.  Compare to Horvat:  31g, 21 a, 19 ppp, 96 hits;  Boeser:  23g, 23a, 17 ppp, 35 hits. 

 

DeBrincat is a premium player;  granted he played on a line with P. Kane but if you put him on a line with Miller and/or Petey, the numbers project to be real good.

 

He may be small in stature but he's sturdy and game  !   I'd take him on my team any day.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...