Everybody Hates Raymond Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Tony Ambrogio@SNTonyAmbrogio #Leafs trade David Steckel to Anaheim Ducks for RW Ryan Lasch and Anaheim’s seventh-round pick in 2014 Draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 There are going to be some people that are not too happy about Steckel going for so cheap. I wonder if this trade started from a phone inquiry regarding Perry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Made room for Lupul, he said he can play tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Nice pickup for Anaheim, as they just get stronger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Making room for Lupul to return from injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Fatigue Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 well well. Ducks more Mighty. Sigh..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaguez Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Not really what the Canucks would need right now. If we just needed face off wins, manny would be playing still. We need someone who can contribute in all three zones. Decent pick up for Ana but not stellar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 I don't know who that prospect is and I probably never will so why the canucks could not have made this deal and bring in some god damn depth is beyond me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeanBeef Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 They didn't need him, McClement's, playing great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Underpayment by ducks. Either that or the prospect is a actually good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Lasch is just a body the Ducks needed to get rid of for flexibility. He had negligible value in this trade, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disisdayear Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Underpayment by ducks. Either that or the prospect is a actually good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Too bad there's so much bad blood between us and the Leafs... I'd have taken Steckel for that price anyday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 gillis couldnt offer up a six rounder frackkkkk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 I don't know who that prospect is and I probably never will so why the canucks could not have made this deal and bring in some god damn depth is beyond me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drummin' Canuck Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 The Ducks have had a somewhat revolving door system on their fourth line much of the year (at centre specifically, Holland, McMillan and others). Steckel should resolve that for them I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 He is not a player Vancouver needs and he won't make or break a team. Depth yes, not the depth player Vancouver needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Steckel's taken a step back this season, but he'll still win draws. Ducks in do or die mode this season with Perry's upcoming UFA status and Teemu's likely retirement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 Underpayment by ducks. Either that or the prospect is a actually good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Korea Bob.Loblaw Posted March 15, 2013 Share Posted March 15, 2013 He is not a player Vancouver needs and he won't make or break a team. Depth yes, not the depth player Vancouver needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.