MikeBossy Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Cody Hodgson 2.0???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Just now, theminister said: Maybe but Brouwer would be a decent pick-up for an expansion team that needs to hit the floor. The optics don't look good to future UFA's to be ditched 11 months after signing long term Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 LOOOOOOL. I wouldn't have given up either of those pieces individually for Lazar. Calgary just got absolutely fleeced. Lazar is garbage and has shown no signs of being anything more than garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 1 minute ago, coryberg said: The optics don't look good to future UFA's to be ditched 11 months after signing long term Maybe. Expansion does alter the optics a bit though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 13 minutes ago, theminister said: ED spots taken up by Guadreau, Bennet, Monahan, Frolik, Backlund, Brouwer. Can only protect one of Ferland, Bouma, Shinkaruk, Poirier, Lazar. Pretty expensive 2nd in that context. Holy crap what a terrible trade then. If I was a Calgary fan I would be absolutely livid. Such a horribly one sided trade to begin with before the expansion issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Even if he passes the ED he would be waiver eligible next season so he better pick up his play or be frank Corrado 2.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatedkid666 Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Jokipakka was on waivers so I guess its more of a contract thing? Which means a 2nd for Lazar is kinda low Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 So the Canucks getting Lazar back in a Burrows trade would have been a bad deal. But the Flames giving up a 2nd for Lazar is a good deal? Canucks fans are a funny bunch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazycry Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Wake up call for Lazar for sure..If he doesn't get his act together quick, seriously going to be Hodgson 2.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 6 minutes ago, DeNiro said: So the Canucks getting Lazar back in a Burrows trade would have been a bad deal. But the Flames giving up a 2nd for Lazar is a good deal? Canucks fans are a funny bunch Some Canuck fans wanted Lazar. I don't know why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 1 minute ago, Ryan Strome said: Some Canuck fans wanted Lazar. I don't know why. Some wanted lazar for virtanen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazycry Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 1 minute ago, Ryan Strome said: Some Canuck fans wanted Lazar. I don't know why. I guess because Lazar does have potential. Maybe a change in scenery and linemates will help him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Just now, coryberg said: Some wanted lazar for virtanen That's flippin ridiculous! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bertuzzi44fan Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 30 minutes ago, coryberg said: They are... both 3rd year pro's Thought if they were under 40 games they weren't eligible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 1 minute ago, coryberg said: Some wanted lazar for virtanen Just now, crazycry said: I guess because Lazar does have potential. Maybe a change in scenery and linemates will help him. If I was Calgary I would rather a 2ND round pick then Lazar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 2 minutes ago, coryberg said: Some wanted lazar for virtanen Some probably still would. 29 minutes ago, guntrix said: Lazar legit sucks... not worried that he'll improve the flames in the least. No worries, he's now in the vaunted Flames development system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 I heard a scout talking on the radio about Lazar, he said that the main concern with Lazar is that he cannot process the game at the NHL level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 2 minutes ago, Ryan Strome said: Some Canuck fans wanted Lazar. I don't know why. I remember when there were people who thought giving up a 2nd for Baertschi was a bad deal. At least Baertschi had put up solid numbers after junior. Lazar has put up a whole lot of nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 1 minute ago, Darius71 said: I heard a scout talking on the radio about Lazar, he said that the main concern with Lazar is that he cannot process the game at the NHL level. Well that's a very big problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.