-Vintage Canuck- Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Poor Shinkaruk.... Wonder if he will ever make the show. Zach Trotman is a really interesting name. IIRC he was getting top-4 time in Boston not too long ago with them getting a bunch of injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Funny how broken up people always are about losing our fringe players. They almost always end up as fringe players who hit the waiver wire repeatedly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 honestly I think Shink is worth another look. Calgary has not used him in a top 9 role so of course his numbers are down. If we traded Rodin e.g., for a C/F prospect with Shink's potential and background of scoring in the WHL and AHL that we weren't as familiar with I think most of CDC would be fine with it. He's only 22. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerrDrFunk Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Oh, man! Corrado on waivers again? ASSET MANAGEMENT! ASSET MANAGEMENT! ASSET MANAGEMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Bang Boogie Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Shinkaruk is a career AHLer. Poirier is a bust. What bad decisions by the Flames. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 16 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: honestly I think Shink is worth another look. Calgary has not used him in a top 9 role so of course his numbers are down. If we traded Rodin e.g., for a C/F prospect with Shink's potential and background of scoring in the WHL and AHL that we weren't as familiar with I think most of CDC would be fine with it. He's only 22. I think it didnt take long for Utica/Canucks management to realize that Shink's game would not translate well in the NHL. Lots of his AHL goals and perimeter play wouldnt have worked in the big league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurt Nirvanagut Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Zatkoff might be an interesting add. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, Darius71 said: I think it didnt take long for Utica/Canucks management to realize that Shink's game would not translate well in the NHL. Lots of his AHL goals and perimeter play wouldnt have worked in the big league. true but looking at the development of Baer e.g., he did overcome similar issues to what Shink will have to as well. Not saying its a slam dunk but I wouldn't be upset by Benning giving it one more try this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaManbeast Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 6 minutes ago, zzbottom said: Zatkoff might be an interesting add. For who??? The Canucks shouldn't claim any of these players. Are we really going to claim Shinkaruk to take a spot from guys like Boeser or Virtanen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 you think Benning might have a little extra jump in his step today haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Shinkaruk was a Gillis draft pick. No way Benning signs him. Besides, he's done nothing to prove he's an NHLer. One of Benning's better trades (Granlund). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonMexico Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 I wonder if Jared Tinordi's career went off the rails thanks to Pedan KO'ing him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 23 minutes ago, ThaManbeast said: For who??? The Canucks shouldn't claim any of these players. Are we really going to claim Shinkaruk to take a spot from guys like Boeser or Virtanen? no but maybe over a PTO. The book on Baer was the same when we got him, and he was able to elevate his game. I don't really care that much either way just saying it could be an interesting move in a rebuild year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solinar Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 ZOMG! We can get Frankie Corrado back and end the debate of asset management! He could be our 10th defenseman Or Shinkaruk and definitely win the Granlund/Shink trade! Oh well, going back to morning coffee and glad we moved forward....hehe Granlund for Shinkaruk, still smiling... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 I would not mind if the Canucks went and placed a claim for Frankie Corrado again. I always liked him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesB Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 31 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: honestly I think Shink is worth another look. Calgary has not used him in a top 9 role so of course his numbers are down. If we traded Rodin e.g., for a C/F prospect with Shink's potential and background of scoring in the WHL and AHL that we weren't as familiar with I think most of CDC would be fine with it. He's only 22. 23 minutes ago, ThaManbeast said: For who??? The Canucks shouldn't claim any of these players. Are we really going to claim Shinkaruk to take a spot from guys like Boeser or Virtanen? 17 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: Shinkaruk was a Gillis draft pick. No way Benning signs him. Besides, he's done nothing to prove he's an NHLer. One of Benning's better trades (Granlund). It would look impressive for the Canucks to end up with Granlund and Shinkaruk -- reminding everyone that Benning won the Granny -- Shink trade. But, as @ThaManbeast says, there is just no room for him on the roster. With guys like Boeser, Virtanen, Rodin, and Burmistrov all contending for the last few spots I just don't see how Shink fits. Shink is (another) classic example of a high skill guy who can score in Junior and in the AHL but whose game does not translate to the NHL. And if he can't play top 6, hard to see how he fits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Bang Boogie Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Just now, JamesB said: Shink is (another) classic example of a high skill guy who can score in Junior and in the AHL but whose game does not translate to the NHL. And if he can't play top 6, hard to see how hit fits. I agree. Also wouldn't be surprised to see him play in Europe in the next year or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 4 minutes ago, JamesB said: It would look impressive for the Canucks to end up with Granlund and Shinkaruk -- reminding everyone that Benning won the Granny -- Shink trade. But, as @ThaManbeast says, there is just no room for him on the roster. With guys like Boeser, Virtanen, Rodin, and Burmistrov all contending for the last few spots I just don't see how Shink fits. Shink is (another) classic example of a high skill guy who can score in Junior and in the AHL but whose game does not translate to the NHL. And if he can't play top 6, hard to see how hit fits. Couldn't we claim him and then turn around and try to send him to Utica anyway? If someone else gets him fine but he could be back in our system. If he could elevate his game the way no one in Calgary thought Baer could it would be a nice thing for us. Cull seems like a level-headed coach who may be very good for his development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 1 minute ago, Jimmy McGill said: Couldn't we claim him and then turn around and try to send him to Utica anyway? If someone else gets him fine but he could be back in our system. If he could elevate his game the way no one in Calgary thought Baer could it would be a nice thing for us. I think the rule is once you make a claim on waivers, the player has to stay active on the roster for 30 days before he can be sent down again. And because he didn't clear the first time, or by waiver rules has spent 30 days on the NHL roster, he would have to go through waivers again to go down to the minors. Thus meaning he would be taking a spot from someone like Brock, Jake, Anton or others Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.