Canuck hero Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 he would be a great pick up for the playoffs at least... but we would have to shed salary next year... someone would get a buy out.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockNroLLa. Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 I don't think that bringing in a guy @ 4.2 that can play in the middle on the second or third lines is a reach, plus he brings some much needed toughness and can also play the wing. I think if MG can get this done that there will be other deals to follow to straighten out our cap. I think that once an initial deal is done, that the rest of the pieces will fall into place as far as where we're going with this lineup. I think that the first deal will be the big one, and a couple of smaller ones to follow, would love it if Dubinsky were the so-called big one. Would really love to see Clarkson end up here somehow as well, as he is a FA at the end of the season, I think we may be able to pry him out of NJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockNroLLa. Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Give them Schroeder and a 1st or 2nd round pick for Dubisnky. Picks are extremely valuable, especially later in the season and for a team that's rebuilding. Gagne was had for a 4th rounder. Sedin - Sedin - Burrows Booth - Kesler - Higgins Raymond - Dubisnky - Hansen Weise - Lapierre - Kassian That's a playoff-ready lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mookie Wilson Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Yea. GMMG can make it happen. Hes gonna have to roll up his sleeves and a read up a book on Burkie. However I cant possibly see anyone trading for Booth. Ballad is movable. So back to your point, taking on a contract like that, would require the moving of Lu or Ballard, since Booth is going to be a real hard sell. That being said I dont think we need to move Lu for Dubinsky. I believe he could be had for Shredder + Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Schneider Ballard Schroeder 2013 6th rd pick for Dubinsky Tyutin Boll Aucoin Sedin-Sedin-Burrows Booth-Kesler-Higgins Raymond-Dubinsky-Hansen Boll-Lapierre-Kassian Edler-Garrison Hamhuis-Bieksa Tyutin-Tanev/Aucoin Luongo Backup G Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 When did this happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockNroLLa. Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 I wonder if we are on Perrys list of teams he would sign with. What we would have to do to sign him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 I wonder if we are on Perrys list of teams he would sign with. What we would have to do to sign him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Yea. GMMG can make it happen. Hes gonna have to roll up his sleeves and a read up a book on Burkie. However I cant possibly see anyone trading for Booth. Ballad is movable. So back to your point, taking on a contract like that, would require the moving of Lu or Ballard, since Booth is going to be a real hard sell. That being said I dont think we need to move Lu for Dubinsky. I believe he could be had for Shredder + Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Don't see a 4.2 million 3C as viable. What I do want from the CBJ is David Savard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Don't see a 4.2 million 3C as viable. What I do want from the CBJ is David Savard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mookie Wilson Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Really? Who wants a $4.2M, 7 points per year defenseman? At least Booth had .5 point per game last year. Any chance we get to move Lu for a good player like Dubinsky, we do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Dubinsky is probably the best third line center available that we could add. We would probably have to trade Booth though. Not sure how we could afford him if we didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Give them Schroeder and a 1st or 2nd round pick for Dubisnky. Picks are extremely valuable, especially later in the season and for a team that's rebuilding. Gagne was had for a 4th rounder. Sedin - Sedin - Burrows Booth - Kesler - Higgins Raymond - Dubisnky - Hansen Weise - Lapierre - Kassian That's a playoff-ready lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Third, Dubinsky is overpaid and as such is not a particularly valuable asset, despite being a good player. It would have to be Dubinsky + for Luongo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boxiebrown Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Not if Booth keeps playing the same way he is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLASSJAW Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Too many Americans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boxiebrown Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Dubinsky is probably the best third line center available that we could add. We would probably have to trade Booth though. Not sure how we could afford him if we didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwnstar Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 i think booth should stay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 I think if dub is going to cost something like Schroeder we should pass. If he was on a 3mill contract I'd be more inclined but I would rather give lapierre the job and pick up another 4th line centre than have a 4.2mill 3rd line centre for the next few years. Think about it.. Ppl would be calling for dubs head all the time and saying why are we paying 4.2 for our 3c when our top six can't score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.