Legend Killer Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 In the new NHL, team success is usually built around youth and pedigree, with ELC's. In order to build a good team, you gotta build through the draft.. when i look at them, and compare them to us.. it shows how poorly we've been managed. For example, through scouting, and development they are set for awhile.. just look at these examples. David Backes - 28 years old; $4,500,000 Until 2015-16 TJ Oshie - 26 years old; $4,175,000 until 2016-17. Just entered first season of new contract after his ELC. During his entry level years he combined for 120 points. David Perron - 24 Years old; just started new contract worth 3,812,500 until 2015-16. Check out these stats, he's not a superstar, but these are his first 3 season. Right out of the draft. 2007-2008 St. Louis Blues NHL 62gp 13g 14a 27pts 2008-2009 St. Louis Blues NHL 81gp 15g 35a 50pts 2009-2010 St. Louis Blues NHL 82gp 20g 27a 47pts Consider that, they have a core group of Backes, Oshie, Perron, and then add on to that in your forward core you have Berglund (RFA), Stewart and Tarasenko (2010 draft pick, we traded our first rounder with grabner for Ballard). Additionally, you can't forget the young d-men in Shattenkirk and Pietrangelo. Both are due pay raises, but these are top d-men in the league. 24, and 23 years old respectively. Plus, Halak isn't old, and Jake Allen is looking like a pure young goalie. Now that you've read that, i'm gonna sum up our core as it stands right now.. Daniel and Henrik Sedin- 32 years old both combining for 12.2 Million. Money well worth it for the players we're getting, but contracts are coming up. - Our highest picks ever.. but that was in 1999 Ryan Kesler - 28 years old at 5 Million per year. Booth - We know this story.. Burrows - signed for 4.5 Million a year until he is around 36/37 years old. That's a combined 25.5 Million. For 5 Players, and that's without touching the Defense.. and goaltending. Since 2004, our most profitable draft in recent memory giving us Schneider, Edler, and Hansen, we have drafted Grabner (gone), Patrick White (lol), Hodgson (gone), Jordan Schroeder (so far, a work in progress after 3 years still). Recently we have drafted Gaunce and Jensen, who show some promise.. but as far as our future goes.. if you think it's gonna better through a blockbuster move.. you've got another thing coming. Boston, LA, Chicago and Pittsburgh have proven that teams that go far are built through youth and drafting well. just food for thought. the future doesn't look that great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Don't get me wrong I like the blues a lot as a team. But what have they done really? Until they have a deep playoff run I don't think you can use them as a model for successful rebuilds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prngr44 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Yeah, I'd hold that praise until they win something. Round 2 just doesn't cut it. I'd also like to see how this round of contracts are going to go because there's a lot to hammer out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Goose Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 The Sedins are Art Ross & Hart Trophy Winners Kesler is a Selke Winner Burrows earned a fair contract The Canucks were 1 game away from a Stanley cup and other than this shortened season are 2 time president trophy winners and always considered a top competitive team. I'd say those accomplishments are all marks of a successful franchise. Can't argue about Booththough but the Canucks lost nothing to acquire him, so trading him/whatever isn't going to throttle the team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 They NEED to do something in the playoffs. THIS season. Multiple RFA's + Tightwad owner. Hardly perfect. However i can see the NHL's mystery rules and preference towards trap hockey working heavily in their favour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Killer Posted March 19, 2013 Author Share Posted March 19, 2013 The Sedins are Art Ross & Hart Trophy Winners Kesler is a Selke Winner Burrows earned a fair contract The Canucks were 1 game away from a Stanley cup and other than this shortened season are 2 time president trophy winners and always considered a top competitive team. I'd say those accomplishments are all marks of a successful franchise. Can't argue about Booththough but the Canucks lost nothing to acquire him, so trading him/whatever isn't going to throttle the team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksordie Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 You're absolutely right. Having impact players with entry level contracts, or bridge contracts before they sign the big deal is key, especially with the cap lowering by something like 10 million next season. The Canucks will soon find themselves handicapped by large, long term contracts to aging players. Besides Jensen, we have no prospects that are even close to being ready to make an impact at the NHL level. The fact is that draft picks/prospects are being treated like gold by most NHL GM's, which makes things even more difficult for the Canucks to get any type of foothold at the draft, or to be rich at the farm level. Once the new "Pacific" division starts up, we will no longer have the luxury of beating up on the Flames, Oilers, Avalanche, and Wild all season. Like some other folks on here, I can see a decline in the future for the Canucks. But hey, you can't be on top forever, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kj29 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Well if St.Louis is such a successful franchise, then why don't we all become St.Louis Blues' fans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Killer Posted March 19, 2013 Author Share Posted March 19, 2013 Reality is that things need to get worse before itll get better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyking Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Reality is that things need to get worse before itll get better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaMacNamedDre Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 There's a cycle for every team Sedins, Kesler, Burrows, Edler, Bieksa, Raymond, Hansen, Schneider all drafted by the Canucks. They are our core and brought us to the cup finals. We haven't had that much of good picks lately. It's normal we are not drafting superstars. On the other hand St-Louis picked Erik Johnson at #1 in 2006 (traded for Shattekirk and Stewart), in 2008 they picked Pietrangelo at #4 and in 2009 they traded the #9 overall pick to San Jose. They had three top 10 picks in the last 6-7 years. Normal that the futur looks bright now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie13 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 A couple of years ago, people were saying the exact same thing about Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papayas Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 EVERYONE PANIC NOW!!!!ahhahahhahahah people who complaint that winning pc didn't matter are complaining that the team is in trouble in normal season, and we should abandon everything from gm to coach .... WTF DO YOU PEOPLE WANT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niklas Jensen Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 St. Louis won't and will never win anything. They were close but when Bobby Orr became superman and scored the cup clinching winner, they were doomed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Yes I forgot about their plethora of Stanley Cups... with all those Banners hanging from their rafters there is no doubt they are PERFECT as the title states. Just food for thought... that future that doesn't look that bright changes all the time... when the Penguins were going to fold and move did their future look bright? When the Jets left Winnipeg did their future look bright? When Calgary made the Cup final did their future look bright? This is a dynamic league bud, one year you may be on top and the next in the gutter... Teams are never as good as you think they are nor as terrible as you think they are... with the salary Cap Parity is at an all time high and with the Cap going down you're going to see some players on waivers or bought out or traded for peanuts, next season is going to reshuffle the deck imo... so stop posting your BS doom and gloom... the Canucks still have a team and the Canucks aren't the Calgary Flames... 2 very postive things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kassassin Train Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 1 year later...I can't wait to pull this thread back up and laugh out hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Killer Posted March 19, 2013 Author Share Posted March 19, 2013 There's a cycle for every team Sedins, Kesler, Burrows, Edler, Bieksa, Raymond, Hansen, Schneider all drafted by the Canucks. They are our core and brought us to the cup finals. We haven't had that much of good picks lately. It's normal we are not drafting superstars. On the other hand St-Louis picked Erik Johnson at #1 in 2006 (traded for Shattekirk and Stewart), in 2008 they picked Pietrangelo at #4 and in 2009 they traded the #9 overall pick to San Jose. They had three top 10 picks in the last 6-7 years. Normal that the futur looks bright now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Killer Posted March 19, 2013 Author Share Posted March 19, 2013 1 year later...I can't wait to pull this thread back up and laugh out hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 I'm not really sure what the point of this thread is. Was there a shortage of pessimism on the board that needed addressing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.