Otis Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 How "major" would this rerate be though? Or would it be pretty minor? It should be major IMO. If I had known he was getting superstar ratings I would've offered a lot more than 2.5m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F.Underwood Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 To : Jamie McBain, Kyle Beach To : COL 1st 2015, uncreated Niklas Hansson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 I'm all in for adjusting ratings if its for every player. If it's one guy (Cheechoo in this case) only, then I wouldn't want it simply cause its unfair to put the spotlight on our one player. Yeah.... Okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaMash Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 I'm all in for adjusting ratings if its for every player. If it's one guy (Cheechoo in this case) only, then I wouldn't want it simply cause its unfair to put the spotlight on our one player. They already did adjust every player in the league before you got here. Cheechoo was just one of the oddities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
logic Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 In all honesty, the reraters emotion should play no factor in the rerates lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 I'm all in for adjusting ratings if its for every player. If it's one guy (Cheechoo in this case) only, then I wouldn't want it simply cause its unfair to put the spotlight on our one player. Do you know how long that would take ? It would shut down the league for 3-4 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklax Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 I'm all in for adjusting ratings if its for every player. If it's one guy (Cheechoo in this case) only, then I wouldn't want it simply cause its unfair to put the spotlight on our one player. Spotlight is already there bud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Grimes Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 What I'd really like to know is where the hell were all of these people that are so concerned about ratings when *VC* & SOB needed help with rating all of the teams in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaMash Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 What I'd really like to know is where the hell were all of these people that are so concerned about ratings when *VC* & SOB needed help with rating all of the teams in the first place. Taking exams at university. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dion Phaneuf Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 The Minnesota Wild don't have a problem with Cheechoo's rating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklax Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 Taking exams at university. Yep, then I helped with prospect creation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmen81 Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 You guys should have just scratched Cheechoo during the preseason. It's your fault you played him and he lead the league in scoring, which is the reason all this has been brought up. If you scratched him then people would have forgotten about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 What I'd really like to know is where the hell were all of these people that are so concerned about ratings when *VC* & SOB needed help with rating all of the teams in the first place. What id like to know is how this point has anything to do with this obsurd rating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nail Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 It should be major IMO. If I had known he was getting superstar ratings I would've offered a lot more than 2.5m Mash posted in the thread that he was 89 scoring... All the GM's should've known Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmen81 Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 What I'd really like to know is where the hell were all of these people that are so concerned about ratings when *VC* & SOB needed help with rating all of the teams in the first place. This league has been my first ever sim league and I was kind of unaware on how things worked, but now I'm starting to grasp how things work and might be willing to help out with stuff in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 The Minnesota Wild don't have a problem with Cheechoo's rating. Yay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 Mash posted in the thread that he was 89 scoring... All the GM's should've known When I read that I honestly thought he was kidding... I mean how could anyone think he was serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nail Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 When I read that I honestly thought he was kidding... I mean how could anyone think he was serious? By being a good GM and checking the SS and do your scouting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 By being a good GM and checking the SS and do your scouting? Yeah I'm a horrible GM. My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 You guys should have just scratched Cheechoo during the preseason. It's your fault you played him and he lead the league in scoring, which is the reason all this has been brought up. If you scratched him then people would have forgotten about it Honestly, I didn't even know we got Cheechoo cause I was AGM before. Nail told me he was going for Cheechoo, and I was cool with it cause we needed forwards that time. Plus, about his scoring, I'm sure a lot of you guys knew about it...someone posted in the thread talking about his rating jokingly when he was still a FA but then no one complained? Wonder why...and yea, lets not play a guy we just signed to a top 9 role so our GM rep will go up right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.