Lychees Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 I'll probably eventually pick up Ghosts, but Call of Duty is a far cry from the must buy that I once figured it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Considering I don't PC game and COD is really the only game I've played on the XBOX for greater than 1 day since November, playing 4 days of video games since November is nothing and probably less time then however much you've played on video games. I was referring to the games you played for 18 and 23 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avelanch Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 4 days, like 96 hours? or you only played on 4 separate occasions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watermelon Posted August 15, 2013 Author Share Posted August 15, 2013 4 days, like 96 hours? or you only played on 4 separate occasions? 96hours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JE14 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 I was referring to the games you played for 18 and 23 days. MW2 is I think 4 years old, 6 days a year is basically nothing considering not all the time is mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
250Integra Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 I'd say both of you have too much time on your hands I don't know how you guys can do practically the same thing over and over again. I need some variety in my gaming, COD's so repetitive. I don't understand how it's repetitive, especially when you're always playing with different players and each time you play, it's completely different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apples Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 No zombie mode no COD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watermelon Posted August 16, 2013 Author Share Posted August 16, 2013 No zombie mode no COD Yeah, since BO's multiplayer sucks the only reason I bought it(other than being a COD fanboy) was for zombies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 MW2 is I think 4 years old, 6 days a year is basically nothing considering not all the time is mine. It's still a long time for playing similar matches in the same game imo. Especially when combined with the other COD games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 I don't understand how it's repetitive, especially when you're always playing with different players and each time you play, it's completely different. I'd say that's not true. Each time you play it's a little different, just slightly. It's pretty much the same thing over and over again. It would be just as repetitive as playing NHL13 against friends over and over again. A little different each time, but overall, the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightHawkSniper Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 Gonna wait till Steam has a discount on it(holidays), already getting a few games this fall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watermelon Posted August 16, 2013 Author Share Posted August 16, 2013 Gonna wait till Steam has a discount on it(holidays), already getting a few games this fall. Isn't steam only for PC? Like I know they offer some games for consoles but do they offer games like NHL,Cod, Battlefield for consoles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avelanch Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 steam offers games for consoles now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLASSJAW Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 He's going to buy the PC version through Steam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jatylo Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 Will probably get ghosts on boxing day deals or when it is at the $40 mark. I absolutely love infected, if they didn't have it i would have passed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 Can't wait Wonder when we'll see another COD as good as Mw2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watermelon Posted August 18, 2013 Author Share Posted August 18, 2013 Can't wait Wonder when we'll see another COD as good as Mw2 I thinks this may be on par with Mw2, that's saying a lot. Mw2 had great hit detection and connection and if Ghosts has that then I'd be excited. Mw3 was a fast paced game and what killed it for me was the internet lag on shooting people and the the hit detection on top of the little things like the fmg9(before patch) or the support package. Like watch this video and skip to the 1 minute mark(thats where the gameplay starts) and you'll see how similar it is to Mw2. I think this will be the best COD in since Mw2, maybe even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 I thinks this may be on par with Mw2, that's saying a lot. Mw2 had great hit detection and connection and if Ghosts has that then I'd be excited. Mw3 was a fast paced game and what killed it for me was the internet lag on shooting people and the the hit detection on top of the little things like the fmg9(before patch) or the support package. Like watch this video and skip to the 1 minute mark(thats where the gameplay starts) and you'll see how similar it is to Mw2. I think this will be the best COD in since Mw2, maybe even better. Yeah, the hit detection in Mw2 was good, except sometimes you would be getting shot at and you run behind a wall and you think you've made it to cover but you die anyway. I know a lot of people complained about this. I died like that many times but I probably also killed as many in the same way. The thing I loved about MW2 was the consistency of the guns/health. I thought every gun was different, and you would know by the damage what gun you have. There was a distinct difference between, say, ACR and Famas and you would know the difference whether you were the shooter or being shot at. Sometimes I thought I died ridiculously fast and I look at the replay and I see the guy got a head-shot with a Stopping Power Famas and it made sense. Other times it felt like I survived a lot of damage but the guy had an ACR with no Stopping Power, so there was a reason I didn't die fast. I played BO and BO2 a significant amount and to me it seemed like the guns were inconsistent as hell. One time I'd kill a guy really fast then the next time it felt like I shot him for 3 seconds straight and he didn't die, all while using the same build. I really couldn't tell the difference between or identify guns specifically in BO and BO2 'cause the damage always seemed random to me. I went through every gun in BO2 and played with them all for a while but they were all consistently inconsistent to the point where I didn't even know or care what gun I was using. I had 3-4 favorite guns in MW2 and my favorites differed from others', but I knew why they chose their guns; each gun seemed to have its clear advantages and disadvantages. Don't know what gun I liked best or worst in BO or BO2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
250Integra Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 Yeah, the hit detection in Mw2 was good, except sometimes you would be getting shot at and you run behind a wall and you think you've made it to cover but you die anyway. I know a lot of people complained about this. I died like that many times but I probably also killed as many in the same way. The thing I loved about MW2 was the consistency of the guns/health. I thought every gun was different, and you would know by the damage what gun you have. There was a distinct difference between, say, ACR and Famas and you would know the difference whether you were the shooter or being shot at. Sometimes I thought I died ridiculously fast and I look at the replay and I see the guy got a head-shot with a Stopping Power Famas and it made sense. Other times it felt like I survived a lot of damage but the guy had an ACR with no Stopping Power, so there was a reason I didn't die fast. I played BO and BO2 a significant amount and to me it seemed like the guns were inconsistent as hell. One time I'd kill a guy really fast then the next time it felt like I shot him for 3 seconds straight and he didn't die, all while using the same build. I really couldn't tell the difference between or identify guns specifically in BO and BO2 'cause the damage always seemed random to me. I went through every gun in BO2 and played with them all for a while but they were all consistently inconsistent to the point where I didn't even know or care what gun I was using. I had 3-4 favorite guns in MW2 and my favorites differed from others', but I knew why they chose their guns; each gun seemed to have it's clear advantages and disadvantages. Don't know what gun I liked best or worst in BO or BO2. Well said although you sucked at MW2. NUKED YOU!!!!! BTW, that gameplay video was unreal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 Well said although you sucked at MW2. NUKED YOU!!!!! BTW, that gameplay video was unreal. My claymores > everyone else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.