adniel_g Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Add pieces on either side... Any takers? Very versatile piece for us moving forward imo. Edler isn't fitting in quite clearly. Big Buff can play with the Sedins, on the second line, Dman if we need? Right now Edler isn't even a good defensive D-man, needs a fresh start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vcrguy Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Yes, big buff is a weapon. I'd like at least a third plus him for Edler though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Not only do you put this in the wrong forum, you don't put a tag? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Line Juggler Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 No thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold Hard Truth Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 E.Kane - Kesler - Kassian Sedin-Sedin-Bfuglien is a sick top 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Even though my hatred for Buff has faded a bit, I still don't like the idea of him being a Canuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piggy Bank Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Stupid not to. Hamhuis byfuglien - cup winning top pair. Garrison Tanev is solid second paring and they all can log huge minutes. Buff can play multiple positions. And Garrison could learn hella from buff. Hes a leader, teacher, big body with experience. If we get anywhere in playoffs, he can protect sedins and be on their line if the other team f's around withem. If Hamhuis Tanev sedins and Buf get good chem together in the post season they will rock ass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Gotta do it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangelos Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 I would do it. Byfuglien would be a legitimate top 6 forward kinda like Burns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam13371337 Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 why do canuck fans automatically think other teams will give up their teams' best assets for underperforming/ overpaid players from Vancouver... and this stuff only comes up when a player is struggling (their value being really low) EDLER WILL NOT GET YOU BIG BUFF... unless you throw in other major assets like horvat and a 2nd second round pick... otherwise you wlill get outbid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Add pieces on either side... Any takers? Very versatile piece for us moving forward imo. Edler isn't fitting in quite clearly. Big Buff can play with the Sedins, on the second line, Dman if we need? Right now Edler isn't even a good defensive D-man, needs a fresh start. Winnipeg offers that deal, the Canucks should take it and run and try to outrun the authorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester13 Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Uggh, I hate this time of year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Even though my hatred for Buff has faded a bit, I still don't like the idea of him being a Canuck. Then I guess you don't like to win... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standing_Tall#37 Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Uggh, I hate this time of year hahaha, I agree. If people knew this fat frack's workout ethic they'd avoid him like the plague. He probably works out by doing liposuction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tortorellatheboss Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Give Edler some time, man. He's had 2 bad seasons and everyone want to trade him, jeebuz. Just like when everyone wanted to trade Bieska Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCRenegade Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Holy people, Edler says frack no. Maybe to a contender he would waive. Gillis will not ask him either. Give up the Edler trades. NTC....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliboy Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 why do canuck fans automatically think other teams will give up their teams' best assets for underperforming/ overpaid players from Vancouver... and this stuff only comes up when a player is struggling (their value being really low) EDLER WILL NOT GET YOU BIG BUFF... unless you throw in other major assets like horvat and a 2nd second round pick... otherwise you wlill get outbid True, but a deal could still be done, but not wih Gillis. Might get it done without Horvat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdubuya Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Why in the living fluck would edler go to Winnipeg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adniel_g Posted January 25, 2014 Author Share Posted January 25, 2014 Why in the living fluck would edler go to Winnipeg? Yeah there is that small matter, but just hypothetically... Would Edler and a 2nd for Buff work/be fair? Or would it take more? Last I checked Buff was struggling in the pegg too, it's not just Edler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Goose Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Yeah there is that small matter, but just hypothetically... Would Edler and a 2nd for Buff work/be fair? Or would it take more? Last I checked Buff was struggling in the pegg too, it's not just Edler. If I'm a WPG fan Edler and a top prospect would be needed for Buff. He is a franchise player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.