TheRussianRocket. Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 @FriedgeHNIC: One other thing: CLB looking for D and hearing Kerby Rychel's name out there. Jackets are loaded with good, young forwards. He has value. I hope JB/TL received the memo and have taken a flyer. This is a chance you can't pass up on and can make the best of our defense situation. Got Bieksa/Hamhuis, offer one of them up and see where talks go. Hopefully they waive if asked (I know Juice has said he wants to say and etc but once they're asked, usually they will comply. ex: Garrison). Rychel a young promising LW PF. Plays a resilient game - not reckless - and knows how to get on the scoreboard. Perfect scenario if it works out with our logjam of young defenders who won't be waiver eligible next year. ...Let the speculation begin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 I would love to have Rychel, but we're in the same spot as Columbus, where we need defense more than forwards, so it doesn't make a lot of sense for us. I'm sure someone else would take them up on Rychel though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 This was just fan talk on Twitter but how realistic would Corrado+ for Rychel be? I agree Benning and Linden need to be all over this if Rychel really is available. Multiple different possibilities if we got him. Baertschi - Horvat - Virtanen Shinkaruk - McCann - Kassian Rychel - Cassels - Bonino Jensen - Gaunce - Grenier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Wonder who made the Rychel + 3rd for Hamhuis proposal a week ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HC20.0 Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Rychel would be an amazing addition to our team. Snag him if we can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl's Jn Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 I would love to have Rychel, but we're in the same spot as Columbus, where we need defense more than forwards, so it doesn't make a lot of sense for us. I'm sure someone else would take them up on Rychel though. it would make sense to trade for youth ... let some roster spots open up for our youth defense ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted May 16, 2015 Author Share Posted May 16, 2015 I would love to have Rychel, but we're in the same spot as Columbus, where we need defense more than forwards, so it doesn't make a lot of sense for us. I'm sure someone else would take them up on Rychel though. Kind of. ...We need fresh faces on the blueline, meaning addition by subtraction and getting rid of some older core guys. Bieksa/Hamhuis fit the bill. If we could move one of them, get a nice return, and replace them with younger dmen, we win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Hamhuis or Bieksa for Rychel and a 2nd round pick for hammer 3rd round pick for Bieksa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goblix Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 This was just fan talk on Twitter but how realistic would Corrado+ for Rychel be? I agree Benning and Linden need to be all over this if Rychel really is available. Multiple different possibilities if we got him. Baertschi - Horvat - Virtanen Shinkaruk - McCann - Kassian Rychel - Cassels - Bonino Jensen - Gaunce - Grenier Tough to say, they'd probably want a more proven defender though.. Hamhuis would fit well but they'd likely want Tanev more. Think I'd rather try to snag their 8th overall pick and try to draft Provorov / Barzal / Werenski All depends on the price I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rey Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 The canucks are kind of screwed. Clendening and Corrado basically have to be on the roster because they can go on waivers next year, so they kind of do need to trade a blueliner or two on the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standing_Tall#37 Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Hmmm send Edler + Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted May 16, 2015 Author Share Posted May 16, 2015 Hmmm send Edler + Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Rychel isn't even guaranteed to be a productive NHL player. They won't take an old Dman for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Rychel isn't even guaranteed to be a productive NHL player. They won't take an old Dman for him. But he plays the type of game Benning likes. He was Virtanen before Virtanen was a big deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Rychel Rights to Mike Reilly 8th Overall Edler 2015 1st Corrado Bonino Higgins... I wish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Rychel is a top six forward ready now and we desperately need to rid aging core vets. Rychel would be a huge youth boost for this team. Hamhuis and a pick for rychel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 I would love to have Rychel, but we're in the same spot as Columbus, where we need defense more than forwards, so it doesn't make a lot of sense for us. I'm sure someone else would take them up on Rychel though. Canucks have to make room for Green... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Plow Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Would love Rychel, perfect player that Benning should target. Would a Corrado+?? package work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Bieksa for Rychel straight up would work for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeltaSwede Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 I think the Canucks need to get all over this and make something work. Rychel would fit in very well in the organization and the Canucks can afford to get rid off one of Corrado and Clendening. I think between those two Benning would likely be more willing to give up Corrado because he was a Gillis draft choice. "Corrado +" but what would the "+" be? Answer: Nick Jensen Needs a scenery change, probably an attractive player to bring in with Oliver Bjorkstrand coming through the ranks. Columbus better their D and replace Rychel with Jensen who could turn it around and develop in a new environment. Jensen would replace Rychel in Springfield in the short-term and has potential under the right circumstances to do so in the long-term as well. Corrado comes into an organization with very weak depth at right handed defenders at both NHL and AHL level. To Vancouver: Kerby Rychel To Columbus: Frank Corrado Nicklas Jensen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.