kenhodgejr Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 Tanev for Cal Foote nice and simple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOFsedins Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 42 minutes ago, higgyfan said: Foote is worth more than the 7th overall. He's ready to join the big club this season, after a monster Jr season. Johnson is a solid C who puts up points. Yeah, I'd rather have Brayden Point than Johnson, but TB ain't gonna do that. So let's here what you think is a fair trade. How about we dont make a trade with TB at all? Unless they are willing to part with a 2019 1st rounder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 42 minutes ago, higgyfan said: Foote is worth more than the 7th overall. He's ready to join the big club this season, after a monster Jr season. Johnson is a solid C who puts up points. Yeah, I'd rather have Brayden Point than Johnson, but TB ain't gonna do that. So let's here what you think is a fair trade. I don't think Cal Foote will be have the potential of some of the D that will be available at 7. Easy pass for us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swedish elite3 Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 12 minutes ago, kenhodgejr said: Tanev for Cal Foote nice and simple Huge loss for Van on that trade in my opinion have watched lots of Foote and I just can't see him being anywhere close to a good dman in the NHL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 32 minutes ago, Alflives said: He’s 28! Why would we give up valuable futures for him? I could see (maybe?) Sutter straight one for one, but nothing involving any of our youth or picks. The comment was a trade involving Tanev and Johnson... not picks or futures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 tanev for carlo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanless Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 7 minutes ago, Swedish elite3 said: Huge loss for Van on that trade in my opinion have watched lots of Foote and I just can't see him being anywhere close to a good dman in the NHL I beg to differ he is very calm and and plays a good positional game. He uses his body well to hold the play in the ozone and to protect the puck however I thought he looked a tad bit lazy at times i see him as an anchor type second pairing a trade of tanev 2018, 2019 second Cal Foote and Johnson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 hour ago, Kanukfanatic said: Haha. When has the last trade like this EVER happened? I like it...but will never happen lmao. Spoiler E5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuppa Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 hour ago, combover said: his Contract and ability to log huge minutes makes him more valuable than a mere 2nd. That doesn’t even get into the shot suppression stats on a terrible team. Offers have to start somewhere usually low you can always offer more. And might get lucky that a sucker takes the lowball first offer. Didn’t jim trade a 2nd for linden vey..........I guess jim starts high.lol. Ya Jim traded are 50th overall pick to Los Angeles for vey. Ya that was bad lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 I like tb as a trade partner because they have an abundance of assets to work with but they already have a top 8 d hedman-stralman mcdonagh-girardi sergechev-coburn Koekkoek(RFA)-dotchin Unless they move girardi or coburn in another move one of which will have to be coming back the other way in any tanev trade to tb: tanev, granlund, baertschi to van: Johnson, coburn, Foote, callahan It’s an ambitious 7 player deal but I like a good blockbuster Tb frees up lots of cap space to sign kuch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenhodgejr Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 hour ago, Swedish elite3 said: Huge loss for Van on that trade in my opinion have watched lots of Foote and I just can't see him being anywhere close to a good dman in the NHL Boris Katchouk & Cal Foote for Chris Tanev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 I heard also NYI as a 3rd team inquiring about Tanev, anyone here know what they can offer in trade value? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenhodgejr Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Sugar baby watermelon said: I heard also NYI as a 3rd team inquiring about Tanev, anyone here know what they can offer in trade value? Kiefer Bellows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 5 minutes ago, Sugar baby watermelon said: I heard also NYI as a 3rd team inquiring about Tanev, anyone here know what they can offer in trade value? Pulock. I would do Tanev for Pulock and a second in a heartbeat. I'd even go Pulock and a third or fourth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 Just now, kenhodgejr said: Kiefer Bellows Hah, I would love that!! But no way Bellows is coming this way. Who else they got, Ho-Sang, might be available, but we have a surplus of RW.... a project in Dal Colle maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, rekker said: Pulock. I would do Tanev for Pulock and a second in a heartbeat. I'd even go Pulock and a third or fourth. Pulock would be sick but I don't think they do that either, what about Devon Toews?? another good d prospect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 Just now, Sugar baby watermelon said: Pulock would be sick but I don't think they do that either I know. It's a pipe dream. I was just about to edit my post. I would do Tanev straight for Pulock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenhodgejr Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 10 minutes ago, rekker said: Pulock. I would do Tanev for Pulock and a second in a heartbeat. I'd even go Pulock and a third or fourth. I would do that to but why would they get rid of Pulock? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 Any interest in Anatoly Golyshev, a LW, on the small side at 5ft8, playing in the KHL, but he had some pretty decent numbers, 18g in 40gp, packaged with a pick maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 9 minutes ago, kenhodgejr said: I would do that to but why would they get rid of Pulock? Who knows maybe they want us to take on Ladds or Mayfields contract and give us one of their 2 1st round picks, one can dream right haha nm just saw Ladds contract on cap friendly dear god why did Garth Snow sign him to this contract?? 5 years at $5.5 not including signing bonuses egads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.