Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Trade] Canucks trade Thomas Vanek to Blue Jackets for Jussi Jokinen, Tyler Motte


Recommended Posts

Boston should have targetted Vanek instead of Nash.

 

Better fit, more competitive fire (at least at this point), and would not have cost them the ridiculous price they paid for Nash.

 

That said, I like Motte - so I don't really care. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 2018-04-25 at 10:01 PM, oldnews said:

Boston should have targetted Vanek instead of Nash.

 

Better fit, more competitive fire (at least at this point), and would not have cost them the ridiculous price they paid for Nash.

 

That said, I like Motte - so I don't really care. 

I agree. Nash is absolutely the most overrated player in my lifetime. (31years)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/04/2018 at 2:26 AM, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said:

Motte has looked really good during the recent Utica stint. Lots of hustle and grit, big counts on hits and SOG, and finally rewarded for his efforts with a beauty of a goal:

 

Gaunce has to be nervous watching those hilites . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Emmetts said:

Lol, i never said he was the 4th line center, but playing with gaunce and motte would make him ours. 

Or are you actually suggesting thats our 3rd line?

 

come at me internet winners

I think it's a very simplistic and frankly not very nuanced view of his role on our very young and rebuilding team and his TOI and importance on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
1 hour ago, oldnews said:

Always fun to re-read these threads after people actually have a chance to see the prospect acquired....

 

Motte's been possbily the best young player in the preseason.

 

The premature stupidity in this thread is epic, but signature CDC.

No offence.....Yes he's played very good, in what....3 preseason games but using a handful of preseason games as proof to declare this move as greatness....that my friend is the equal definition of "premature stupidity". 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, ForsbergTheGreat said:

No offence.....Yes he's played very good, in what....3 preseason games but using a handful of preseason games as proof to declare this move as greatness....that my friend is the equal definition of "premature stupidity". 

 

you're trying too hard.  and failing.

 

"proof to declare this move as greatness".......'my friend' - are your straw words. 

 

One team made an offer on Vanek - anyone that wouldn't have taken this deal is a plain fool.  Anyone that expected more are pretty delusional.

 

I liked this deal when it happened - don't need to watch 3 preseason games - or 15 to end last season - to realize this was a good return on a Vanek rental - because Motte was not an unknown quantity - and people appear to have had absurd expectations of a Vanek rental deal.

 

"Premature stupidity" is judging Motte as "soft", "nothing", "tiny", "brutal" etc (premature, uninformed judgement) that is riddled throughout this thread. 

Writing this player off before knowing a thing about them is precisely premature stupidity.

 

There are no guarantees with any prospect (or pick) - and I sure as hell haven't offered you any.  What you get with this player are better odds of an NHLer than a mid round pick, period.  "Proof of greatness" is pure bullcrap that you alone originated.

 

And with that, I've reached my one post limit where endless, tedious FTG back and forths are concerned.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oldnews said:

you're trying too hard.  and failing.

 

The only one failing is you.. You're the one bumping a thread after 3 preseason games calling out people who weren't thrilled with it.. Seems to me that you were on a mission.  Too bad you didn't realize that the thing you were calling people out for "being premature" was the exact same thing you were doing....haha typical oldnews....swing and another miss.  

 

 

Quote

One team made an offer on Vanek - anyone that wouldn't have taken this deal is a plain fool. 

Speaking of straw, i'm curious to what people said it would have been better getting nothing in steading of accepting this deal?  People just stated they would have preferred picks.... and when I say people....that includes our GM Jim Benning..  

https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/benning-wanted-picks-return-settled-next-best-thing/

 

Yep sorry oldnews that's game set and match for you. haha

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...