ReggieBush Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Brutal call. The reason why hughes had to hold was because he was being held in the first place taking him out of the play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckfromlangley Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 I have seen a puck in the net and the ref call it back because he intended to blow the whistle. This makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raspberries Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Schenn is not gonna like this. Not at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-SN- Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 1 minute ago, debluvscanucks said: What was the explanation? Something about the puck continuing? I didn't see it but got in just to hear that nonsense. Uh, what?? They review goals ALL the time and listen for the whistle to see if it's before or after the puck went in. So we changed that today? Yeah. I guess they're supposed to always keep playing past the whistle (which could be on time, early, or late, as defined later) to some loosely defined point in time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackofwind Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, Darius said: Bs . he chicken winged the stick Nah he didn't really, he had the stick up high in the armpit but Granlund wasn't winging on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 3 minutes ago, Raspberries said: Yes. That was it. Puck was in a continuous motion *after* the whistle. Seriously. Well that's a new one. They're getting creative with their crappy calls. Did they use MS paint to write that in to the rule book? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNucks1 Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 forgot simmonds was on nash now, weird not seeing him in a orange jersey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mo Grit Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Ya, can't have one of Bettman's teams embarrassed in their own barn. Word's out to their enablers, penalize everything until we're level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackofwind Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 1 minute ago, canuckfromlangley said: I have seen a puck in the net and the ref call it back because he intended to blow the whistle. This makes no sense. Right? This is almost a new level of throwing out the rulebook when we start questioning whether whistles stop play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdeath Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 You know Marky is feeling it when he says F it and clears the zone himself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreyHatnDart Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 So from now on if a guy shoots, the whistle blows and then it goes into the net untouched it’s a good goal? I just got in and only half saw it but wtf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Just now, GreyHatnDart said: So from now on if a guy shoots, the whistle blows and then it goes into the net untouched it’s a good goal? I just got in and only half saw it but wtf? No, just this one time because....Canucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Two minutes for stopping the continuous motion of the puck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KelownaCanucksFan Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 These refs are only looking to make calls on the Canucks, there’s been around 6 non calls this period so far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Oh ffs miss the high stick and call that of course... this officiating is brutal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackofwind Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Just now, GreyHatnDart said: So from now on if a guy shoots, the whistle blows and then it goes into the net untouched it’s a good goal? I just got in and only half saw it but wtf? Yes, and if the refs say anything about "intent to blow the whistle" it's just another massive indication of NHL officiating's hypocrisy and incompetence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SergioMomesso Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 How about hit the net fellas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck2288 Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Geez is Nashville fighting for a playoff spot? League sure wants them to win tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackofwind Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Aaaaand another, because we wouldn't want Nashville to lose in their own barn would we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck2288 Posted April 5, 2019 Share Posted April 5, 2019 Sarah, those penalties are how the refs get paid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.