• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   
Pete M

(Proposal) Tanev for Chicago's 8th pick

Recommended Posts

If Dobson and Bouchard are both available, then trade Tanev for Chicago's 8th OA pick.

Possibly take on Seabrook's contract for a sweetner.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edler Gud

Seabrook Stech

OJ Bouchard 

MDZ Dobson

Hutton Pouliot

Biega

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Pete M said:

If Dobson and Bouchard are both available, then trade Tanev for Chicago's 8th OA pick.

Possibly take on Seabrook's contract for a sweetner.

Why not Tanev for 8th and Hossa?

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rob_Zepp said:

Why not Tanev for 8th and Hossa?

Is Hossa still on the books?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

image.thumb.png.a3efa85ac3310356ad06e57ba9a20bd6.png

 

Seabrook's contract is bad...Luongo bad.

  • Hydration 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

Only if Benning has compromising photos of Stan Bowman with a donkey. 

Wait, are you saying he doesn't???

 

Then, what the hell has he been doing the last 3 years if not accumulating incriminating photos of his fellow GM's?

 

Must I do EVERYTHING????

::D

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said:

Wait, are you saying he doesn't???

 

Then, what the hell has he been doing the last 3 years if not accumulating incriminating photos of his fellow GM's?

 

Must I do EVERYTHING????

::D

I was wondering why you were walking down the street in a Ghillie Suit.....:lol:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

I was wondering why you were walking down the street in a Ghillie Suit.....:lol:

Just need the right midgets with a team of sheep and goats, lots of alcohol and a photographer with low morals and you can MOVE THE WORLD!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, The Great Canucks said:

Seabrook's contract is garbage. Why the hell would we want it?

To get the 8th overall pick?? :huh: Has you been reading?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, The Great Canucks said:

Seabrook's contract is garbage. Why the hell would we want it?

well... because Seabrook probably has 3 more good seasons in him, and we'd be able to get two potential top pairing D in the next draft? 

 

I don't mind the idea at all tbh, Seabrook is a good leader, would be just fine in a 4-6 role and could be bought out if there's another compliance buy out window for the next CBA. 

Edited by Jimmy McGill
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tanev 50% retained would be a better idea than taking on Seabrook's horrendous contract.  That should get you pretty close to 8th OA value +/-.

 

See if we could take back Anisimiov (he'd need to waive) and his contract as well for an even better return (and he could C Pettersson for a couple years).

  • Hydration 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said:

well... because Seabrook probably has 3 more good seasons in him, and we'd be able to get two potential top pairing D in the next draft? 

 

I don't mind the idea at all tbh, Seabrook is a good leader, would be just fine in a 4-6 role and could be bought out if there's another compliance buy out window for the next CBA. 

Exactly...Seabrook replaces Tanev in the next 3 years and we get two stud Dmen that could step in this or next year.

 

Chicago gets a good shutdown dman and needed cap space...

Edited by Pete M
add
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pete M said:

Exactly...Seabrook replaces Tanev in the next 3 years and we get two stud Dmen that could step in this or next year.

 

Chicago gets a good shutdown dman and needed cap space...

Gives us another PP option as well. 

 

I suppose it depends on how desperate CHI is for cap space and expansion protection. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Silky mitts said:

Why would Chicago do that 

get rid of Seabrook's contract so that they can sign Tavares???...lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Pete M said:

get rid of Seabrook's contract so that they can sign Tavares???...lol

Chicago is still happy to have Seabrook around, at least they said so to the media not long ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.