thedestroyerofworlds

Members
  • Content Count

    3,847
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

thedestroyerofworlds last won the day on June 6

thedestroyerofworlds had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

4,308 Gaming the system

About thedestroyerofworlds

  • Rank
    Canucks Third-Line
  • Birthday 06/02/1976

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    In the P dot G dot

Recent Profile Visitors

4,876 profile views
  1. 1) Except the multiple times that audits have been done for this election, including recounts, there has been no evidence of fraud. Occasional mistakes like votes being tabulated twice or small batches of uncounted votes. Nothing in the tens of thousands and nothing widespread. That's with bipartisan officials reporting this. That's in areas that are GOP run. The link is but one example. Georgia says voting machine audit found no evidence of fraud or tampering PUBLISHED TUE, NOV 17 2020 2:39 PM EST 2) You just provide a summary of someone saying they have evidence. Not court transcripts of them entering this bombshell evidence in court. They've had plenty of cases where the could have entered this bombshell evidence. They haven't. Their time in court has been laughable. A disgrace. You don't lose in court a badly as they have been if you got the goods. Like this one: ‘Not How The Constitution Works’: Trump Campaign’s Biggest Election Lawsuit Fails In Court 3) Funny how in public they cry foul. In Court its another thing. Really quality witnesses. Their big bombshell witness for the Four Seasons debacle was a sex offender. Man featured at Giuliani press conference is a convicted sex offender 4) It would be nice in actual court if they would present their evidence of fraud. Time after time, not so much. Donald Trump And His Lawyers Are Making Sweeping Allegations of Voter Fraud In Public. In Court, They Say No Such Thing 5) The observers think was destroyed in court. They were not kept 100 feet away. And even if they were, Pennsylvania state law only requires that they be in the room. They were in the room. Guess who in the majority in the state legislature? It isn't the Democrats. Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejects Trump campaign lawsuit over election observers in Philadelphia 6) source please. 7) So having evidence to support their claims would be important wouldn't you say. We've shown time after time that Rudy and co. Have failed to present evidence to support their claims. I got a witness statement that they saw sasquatch. Actual evidence would make that claim valid. Without it, means nothing.
  2. Says the guy who has failed to provide any sources for his claims outside of some tweets that themselves lack any sources. I got an affidavit that a witness saw sasquatch. Mounds of evidence that they exist. /s
  3. Here, I'll help you out. This is a case in Pennsylvania that got thrown out. The judge was an Obama appointee. HOWEVER, this judge was a longtime member of the GOP and a member of the Federalist Society. In NO WAY is he an activist leftist judge. This is a case where Rudy and co. could have presented the evidence you speak of. Present actual arguments. THEY FAIL MISERABLY That is why this case was thrown out with prejudice. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/21/federal-judge-tosses-trump-suit-over-pennsylvania-election-results-439010 ‘This is simply not how the Constitution works’: Federal judge eviscerates Trump lawsuit The judge issued a withering opinion in his dismissal of the suit that Rudy Giuliani turned up to argue in a small Pennsylvania city this week.
  4. You do not get to claim some conspiracy as to your lack of evidence. You are certain that there has been fraud. You claim that there are mounds of evidence. PRODUCE IT. If you fail to do so, then your claim can be refuted with AH Na there isn't!!
  5. Care to provide us with this evidence you claim is out there. Thing is, the TRUMP team had numerous opportunities to present said evidence in court. You know, the one place where this evidence matters. They have lost ten times the few cased that they won. Time after time. Team TRUMP has been asked over and over to present something. Anything to show the public that they have the goods. Nothing. Their "star" witness at the Four Seasons debacle was a sex offender. So PLEASE. PRESENT YOUR EVIDENCE WITH SOURCES PLEASE
  6. Care to provide us with this evidence you claim is out there. Thing is, the TRUMP team had numerous opportunities to present said evidence in court. You know, the one place where this evidence matters. They have lost ten times the few cased that they won. Time after time. Team TRUMP has been asked over and over to present something. Anything to show the public that they have the goods. Nothing. Their "star" witness at the Four Seasons debacle was a sex offender. So PLEASE. PRESENT YOUR EVIDENCE WITH SOURCES PLEASE
  7. Copypaste. Not mine. I'll add one: If you think that the potential COVID vaccines will have a microchip that "they" will use to track you, while posting about this "conspiracy" on social media, you ARE a COVIDiot. 1. If you think the virus was manufactured in a lab, by global elitists for population control, you might be a covidiot. 2. If you think it’s “just the flu” despite contradictory evidence (literally everywhere) that proves otherwise, you might be a covidiot. 3. If you think the government mandating mask wearing is because they want to “control you” and not to protect vulnerable populations, you might be a covidiot. 4. If you think the current strain on the health care system is a lie, while failing to realize that people still need hospital beds for things like strokes and heart attacks and not just covid, you might be a covidiot. 5. If you think mask wearing violates your rights, not only might you be a covidiot, you may also want to leave the confines of your precious mind and do some research on places in the world where human rights are actually violated. Then take a seat because you might be a covidiot. 6. If you’ve ever typed the words “new world order” on your Facebook status because you believe that it’s true, you might be a covidiot. 7. If you think that the internet makes you smarter than the men and women who have dedicated their entire lives to the study of viral contagions because you read an article on some blog post somewhere, you might be a covidiot. 8. If you are unable to distinguish something you hypothesize to be true, against actual scientific facts and figures, you might be a covidiot. 9. If you think everyone is “overreacting because only old people or previously sick people die” there is no might be, you ARE a covidiot. 10. If you’re “not changing anything” because screw the government for trying to tell you what to do, you might be a covidiot. 11. If you think that acknowledging science to be true makes one a “kool-aid drinking sheep” look in the mirror and check, cause you might see a covidiot.
  8. Like how the one judge who ruled against the TRUMP campaign was a long time Republican and member of the Federalist Society. He was an Obama appointee.
  9. I get that. I was just kinda adding on with your reasons for why this "excessive profit" tax is weird. That maybe the excessive profit should go to better wages/bonuses for the average employees and not just executives/CEOs
  10. Having a Rhodes scholar and a Harvard Law grad compared to their counterparts. Further example having a nuclear physicist to head the DOE as opposed to putting Rick Perry in that spot.
  11. Before or after paying the employees a decent wage. Executives and CEO's have gotten plenty of raises in pay year over year. The people, not so much. Those minimum wage employees of that major corporation should be getting significantly more based on inflation alone, let alone increases in productivity. Bring on the robots.
  12. Who would have thought that electing a lifelong grifter would end up with debts being unpaid? Interesting. https://www.ktsm.com/news/city-of-el-paso-hires-legal-counsel-to-help-collect-trump-campaigns-outstanding-debt/ City of El Paso hires legal counsel to help collect Trump campaign’s outstanding debt