Gollumpus Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Hodgson? Since when? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gizmo2337 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 I guess not. I figured that was the most likely destination Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nd84 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 maybe when we have to make our pick they'll announce something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palindrom Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Gillis Probably turned down Schneider for 17th overall + Pavelsky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drop Em Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Clowe HATES the Canucks. Why would we want him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Sharks are absolutely STACKED on defence with guys the Canucks need: Burns, Murray, Vandemeer, Braun etc. We need 2 top-4 defencemen and Burns or Murray would fit the big, physical role we need, especially Murray. Sharks need to get younger and develop some prospects, we need a physical veteran defenceman. Tanev or a 3rd rounder straight up for Murray. Ballard and Raymond (why not) for Clowe (big, strong playmaker) Sedin - Sedin - Booth Clowe - Kesler - Higgins Burrows - Lapierre - Hansen Kassian - Malhotra - Bitz Weise Hamhuis - Bieksa Edler - Murray Salo - Alberts Luongo Schneider That's a much bigger, physical forward group, a dominantly physical defence and a much sounder defensively squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleednucksblue Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Sharks are absolutely STACKED on defence with guys the Canucks need: Burns, Murray, Vandemeer, Braun etc. We need 2 top-4 defencemen and Burns or Murray would fit the big, physical role we need, especially Murray. Sharks need to get younger and develop some prospects, we need a physical veteran defenceman. Tanev or a 3rd rounder straight up for Murray. Ballard and Raymond (why not) for Clowe (big, strong playmaker) Sedin - Sedin - Booth Clowe - Kesler - Higgins Burrows - Lapierre - Hansen Kassian - Malhotra - Bitz Weise Hamhuis - Bieksa Edler - Murray Salo - Alberts Luongo Schneider That's a much bigger, physical forward group, a dominantly physical defence and a much sounder defensively squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Sharks are absolutely STACKED on defence with guys the Canucks need: Burns, Murray, Vandemeer, Braun etc. We need 2 top-4 defencemen and Burns or Murray would fit the big, physical role we need, especially Murray. Sharks need to get younger and develop some prospects, we need a physical veteran defenceman. Tanev or a 3rd rounder straight up for Murray. Ballard and Raymond (why not) for Clowe (big, strong playmaker) Sedin - Sedin - Booth Clowe - Kesler - Higgins Burrows - Lapierre - Hansen Kassian - Malhotra - Bitz Weise Hamhuis - Bieksa Edler - Murray Salo - Alberts Luongo Schneider That's a much bigger, physical forward group, a dominantly physical defence and a much sounder defensively squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BackoffBert Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Is it Manny Malholtra for Joe Thornton?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSniper88 Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 kesler for clowe pavelski is more reasonable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiDeN Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 The only trade that was going to happen today would have involved us giving a pick, not taking one. Gillis wants guys to play NOW, not a couple years from now, so we obviously weren't trying to trade up. Hockey trades are definitely still possible in these next rounds, as teams are focusing on specific players and positional needs. If we had something with San Jose, then I doubt it's dead. If we didn't, then as Bush said,"Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, can't fool me again." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 If we didn't, then as Bush said,"Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, can't fool me again." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Considering how this started with a nothing post on twitter, i'm kinda surprised at the length of this thread. Nothing happened on the trade front with this team today. On account Gillis cannot take on a salary dump at this point, and he doesn't want to give up a salary either unless his team actually improves. That'll take some time. Cheers. TOML Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 There's so much wrong with this post I don't even know where to start. First-Stacked with guys we need and you mention Vandermeer and Braun?!! WTF?!! Second-Why would SJ trade Murray for another more inexperienced, less physical defenseman?! Third-Why would SJ trade their only big top 6 winger for a somewhat overpriced defenseman and a faltering RFA in Raymond?! Epic fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Murray has lost a step by all accounts and Clowe is far superior to Raymond for when the games matter. I hope Raymond improves, but we'll see. I wouldn't turn Murray away if he was rebuildable, but we'll see. I think Wilson is done with giving us good players for nothing. Cheers. TOML Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoosh Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 Douglas Murray would be a good upgrade at d size-wise. But why would SJ move him of all their d-men? And for anything you've mentioned here, Ballard, Raymond, Tanev? And the funniest of all - a 3rd rounder or Tanev straight up for Murray. Really? Does trading look and sound that easy to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 And the funniest of all - a 3rd rounder or Tanev straight up for Murray. Really? Does trading look and sound that easy to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeanBeef Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 What people are saying about Clowe now (ie. Raymond is just as good or Clowe is not as good, Clowe had a horrible year) is similar to what some have been saying about Booth last year. Where's Booth now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 What people are saying about Clowe now (ie. Raymond is just as good or Clowe is not as good, Clowe had a horrible year) is similar to what some have been saying about Booth last year. Where's Booth now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bananas Posted June 23, 2012 Share Posted June 23, 2012 I WANT CLOWE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.