Pears Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 As per Friedman, but they'll still have cap to move to be able to fit him in: @FriedgeHNIC: Hearing the much-rumoured extension between CHI and Brent Seabrook is closing in. @FriedgeHNIC: Expecting AAV to be in range of 6.85M on Seabrook. @FriedgeHNIC: Seabrook is eight years at approximately a $6.85M AAV. Good for him, he earned it. Dang it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 I'd like to see what Bowman has up his sleeve to fit this one under the cap. Bickell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c00kies Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 Good deal if the rumoured number is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 we will see what happens as he might not want to be underpaid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 Good deal if the rumoured number is correct. For a 3 year deal yes... for a 7 year deal no way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 Rather have Seabrook than Lucic. Sorry Lucic fans, we need defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Kane Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 yaay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 yaay naay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z Hockey Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 We probably would have overpaid for Seabrook anyway because of the type player he is, he'd be a very similar replacement of Bieksa, it would have been in a way pointless to let Bieksa go and sign Seabrook for more money. He's also coming out of the prime range, I'd rather target cheaper and potential steal acquisitions like Mark Fayne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 We probably would have overpaid for Seabrook anyway because of the type player he is, he'd be a very similar replacement of Bieksa, it would have been in a way pointless to let Bieksa go and sign Seabrook for more money. He's also coming out of the prime range, I'd rather target cheaper and potential steal acquisitions like Mark Fayne. Seabrook is a lot better than Bieksa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 He'll be 39 when this contract ends. Blackhawk 4 lyfe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 SHI KAH GO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted September 27, 2015 Share Posted September 27, 2015 I'm glad I can move forward and continue to hate him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted September 27, 2015 Share Posted September 27, 2015 For a 3 year deal yes... for a 7 year deal no way 8 years ?!?! This guy will be bieksa 2.0 in 4 years.... horrible deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatedkid666 Posted September 27, 2015 Share Posted September 27, 2015 Too long. Sucks we wont be able to get him in free agency Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfruits Posted September 27, 2015 Share Posted September 27, 2015 good we can stop speculating signing him next off season which was never going to happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z Hockey Posted September 27, 2015 Share Posted September 27, 2015 Seabrook is a lot better than Bieksa. He's not ALOT better than Bieksa. Seabrook has hit 40 plus points twice in his career so far, Bieksa has had 40 plus point seasons three times, they skate similar and have a similar stride and defensive awareness. Bieksa is also a better fighter, Seabrook has the Cups mainly because of P. Kane, Toews, Hossa, Sharp, and Keith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.