BenQc Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Good Signing, with Hamuis gone, we needed another D. https://twitter.com/MLalancetteTVA/status/675044432476053504 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 2 minutes ago, BenQc said: Good Signing, with Hamuis gone, we needed another D. https://twitter.com/MLalancetteTVA/status/675044432476053504 You know this has nothing to do with the hamhuis injury right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Another D? He's our prospect from last years 3rd round. Not sure he's gonna be making much of an impact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Are you joking about Brisebois replacing Hamhuis while he's injured? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenQc Posted December 10, 2015 Author Share Posted December 10, 2015 Just now, Teemu Selänne said: Are you joking about Brisebois replacing Hamhuis while he's injured? GJ on reading sarcasm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 2 minutes ago, BenQc said: GJ on reading sarcasm Kind of hard when you're behind a computer screen... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackcanuck Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 5 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Another D? He's our prospect from last years 3rd round. Not sure he's gonna be making much of an impact. It is the 3rd we got from CAR for the Lack trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 4 minutes ago, BenQc said: GJ on reading sarcasm Uh, 'GJ' on writing it... But good signing, he's been much better the last month after a slow start. I'm still not sure on how likely he is to have an NHL impact, but I'm happy to watch his development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyoung Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 We should be mind readers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HC20.0 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Happy with the signing, solid prospect. But geeze, your post sounds snotty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatedkid666 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Why would we sign him? Isnt he a ways away? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintPatrick33 Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 15 minutes ago, hatedkid666 said: Why would we sign him? Isnt he a ways away? He is two years away from being two years away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatedkid666 Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 2 minutes ago, SaintPatrick33 said: He is two years away from being two years away. He is definitely a project that can end up working really well but we drafted him uber young Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 Ohhh yeah. The time is now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 hopefully he plays another yr in the q then a yr in utica maybe maje team when hes 21 -22 hopefully he gains a bunch of muscle over summer benning finds these gems so fingers crossed he ends up a gamer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HK Phooey Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 54 minutes ago, hatedkid666 said: Why would we sign him? Isnt he a ways away? Sliding scale...his contract won't count against the 50 allowed (Canucks had only 45 under contract...46 now with Brisebois). Good for Brisebois...at least he'll get his $75K signing bonus so he'll have some cash while playing in junior. Plus, JB had to get Brisebois signed before desi had a caniption like he did when it took Subban some time to sign last summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 24 minutes ago, HK Phooey said: Sliding scale...his contract won't count against the 50 allowed (Canucks had only 45 under contract...46 now with Brisebois). Good for Brisebois...at least he'll get his $75K signing bonus so he'll have some cash while playing in junior. Plus, JB had to get Brisebois signed before desi had a caniption like he did when it took Subban some time to sign last summer. It also means they can be more involved in his training as he is now property rather than simply owning his rights. That's a major factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HK Phooey Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 19 minutes ago, theminister said: It also means they can be more involved in his training as he is now property rather than simply owning his rights. That's a major factor. I would hazard to say that the Canucks organization would be involved in developing their prospects regardless of whether they were signed or not...example: Curtis Valk and the way the Canucks have supported him through his rehab (though it can be argues that the Comets, by extension are the Canucks). Do you think the Canucks were any less involved in monitoring and being involved in Jordan Subban's development the years after drafting him and leaving him unsigned for 2 years? Because we don't hear much about Kyle Petit (and the fact that he remains unsigned) doesn't mean the Canucks are any less involved in his development. But, yah, a contract formalizes and cements the team and player's commitment to each other at least for the duration of the contract, so I have to say, it's good to get these kids who have promise signed to a contract sooner than later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 36 minutes ago, HK Phooey said: I would hazard to say that the Canucks organization would be involved in developing their prospects regardless of whether they were signed or not...example: Curtis Valk and the way the Canucks have supported him through his rehab (though it can be argues that the Comets, by extension are the Canucks). Do you think the Canucks were any less involved in monitoring and being involved in Jordan Subban's development the years after drafting him and leaving him unsigned for 2 years? Because we don't hear much about Kyle Petit (and the fact that he remains unsigned) doesn't mean the Canucks are any less involved in his development. But, yah, a contract formalizes and cements the team and player's commitment to each other at least for the duration of the contract, so I have to say, it's good to get these kids who have promise signed to a contract sooner than later. Yes, actually. There are rules that restrict what an organization can do if the player is not signed and is in junior. They can talk but can't offer material support as it is construed as 'payment,' something a junior aged player can't get as it would affect their amateur standing. The CHL isn't as bad as NCAA but it does have its boundaries. Edit: it's also something that agents pay very special attention to. They expect a contract before they start tasking a player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HK Phooey Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 1 minute ago, theminister said: Yes, actually. There are rules that restrict what an organization can do if the player is not signed and is in junior. They can talk but can't offer material support as it is construed as 'payment,' something a junior aged player can't get as it would affect their amateur standing. The CHL isn't as bad as NCAA but it does have its boundaries. What would qualify as material support? Transfer of knowledge and training programs, etc. can be done, as well as mentorship (as a what if -- Stan Smyl or any of the development consultants like Ryan Johnson visiting a prospect on a regular basis and counseling them, etc.) is allowed as far as I know (I say this this only because of past friends who were drafted but never signed by the team that drafted them, and they received a fair amount of input from the team they were drafted by...it was up to them whether to accept the team's input or not). The lines are very grey and teams can keep a watchful eye on their unsigned prospects...but I know what you're saying about signing a kid to a contract -- it demonstrates a commitment between the team and player, so that would have implied and actual cooperation to work together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.