86Viking Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 1 minute ago, theminister said: Lefty. Played beside Dean Stewart, who was a huge step down from the top pairing of Cholowski and Fabbro for the West team. Not that it matters, he'd be a late round project. he must have promise if he was in that top prospects game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 3 minutes ago, Yotes said: he must have promise if he was in that top prospects game It's tier II. Thats not true. Ask ForsbergTheGreat as he played in that league. Huge disparity in quality. There was Jost and Fabbro...followed far behind by Cairns and Grannary. Miller was the surprise for me. / Jeffers was decent too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 7 minutes ago, theminister said: It's tier II. Thats not true. Ask ForsbergTheGreat as he played in that league. Huge disparity in quality. There was Jost and Fabbro...followed far behind by Cairns and Grannary. Miller was the surprise for me. / Jeffers was decent too. ahh i see my bad, so this cdc guy he any good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Just now, Yotes said: ahh i see my bad, so this cdc guy he any good? Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 2 minutes ago, theminister said: Huh? forsbergthe great was he any good?? has he revealed his name so everyone could look up his stats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 3 hours ago, Yotes said: forsbergthe great was he any good?? has he revealed his name so everyone could look up his stats No, but I know who he is. He was quite good. Lead his team in scoring a couple of years and I saw him play in the RBC Cup, with eventual NHL players and outscored them. Good skill, tenacity and hockey sense. Took too many penalties and his skating wasn't exceptional, from what I remember. (I know you'll read this eventually FTG ). But he knows what he's talking about... I know that. CDC treats everyone the same. I don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted February 21, 2016 Share Posted February 21, 2016 On 2/12/2016 at 3:12 PM, Gooseberries said: It's a huge mistake not trading hamhuis this year. Even more so after you factor in that we can resign him in the offseason. Finally we are in a position of power in a trade. When is the last time that happens. Kesler? No. Lu? No. Schneider? No. Bieksa? No. Let's sell to the highest bidder and come away with a clear win. this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 After seeing Tennyson felled like Andrew Alberts, the Sharks might be gaining interest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notafan Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Definitely interesting situation between LA and Washington. He are MY proposals for each of these teams: LA - Hamhuis for Cernak, 3rd (2016) + 6th (2016) WASH - Hamhuis for Bowey + 4th (2016) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
messier's_elbow Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Hamhuis probably won't be traded. I had a feeling Sunday Hunter might get traded. I have a feeling McCann might get dealt. I hope not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stanky Legs Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 According to reports, Hamhuis hasn't been asked to waive. Don't expect anything. The Canucks still have delusional hopes of making the playoffs hence they are buying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canorth Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 2 minutes ago, Stanky Legs said: According to reports, Hamhuis hasn't been asked to waive. Don't expect anything. The Canucks still have delusional hopes of making the playoffs hence they are buying. Right...and it also says: reports Jay Janower of Global BC. Regardless, the 33-year-old admits he and his family are discussing their options as they anticipate a potential move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 4 minutes ago, Stanky Legs said: According to reports, Hamhuis hasn't been asked to waive. Don't expect anything. The Canucks still have delusional hopes of making the playoffs hence they are buying. They'll probably wait until after their game against San Jose to do it, giving them limited time to negotiate. I expect a 2nd round pick at best if the deal goes down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firestorm238 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 1 minute ago, Canorth said: Right...and it also says: reports Jay Janower of Global BC. Regardless, the 33-year-old admits he and his family are discussing their options as they anticipate a potential move. Yeah that second part kinda reverses the headline - he knows it's coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 6 minutes ago, firestorm238 said: Yeah that second part kinda reverses the headline - he knows it's coming. I hope they've at least had discussions about where he's willing to move to though. If all of a sudden a deal from Tampa is made and all they need is Hamhuis to sign off on it, it might complicate things if he refuses to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firestorm238 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 12 minutes ago, DeNiro said: I hope they've at least had discussions about where he's willing to move to though. If all of a sudden a deal from Tampa is made and all they need is Hamhuis to sign off on it, it might complicate things if he refuses to go. I'm sure they have - the whole 'I haven't been asked to waive' line always seems like a bit of legal dodging to me. No he hasn't been asked to waive - which requires the exchange of documents between the player, agent, team, and counsel for all of the above. However, he probably has been told that it's likely that he'll be traded, and I'm sure some possible destinations have been made. Think back to the Bieksa trade - they didn't ask him to waive until the last minute, but we learned later that he had ample time to go down to San Jose and check it out (before that trade fell through). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 He would be willing to go to any contender I think! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 On 20/02/2016 at 7:32 PM, theminister said: No, but I know who he is. He was quite good. Lead his team in scoring a couple of years and I saw him play in the RBC Cup, with eventual NHL players and outscored them. Good skill, tenacity and hockey sense. Took too many penalties and his skating wasn't exceptional, from what I remember. (I know you'll read this eventually FTG ). But he knows what he's talking about... I know that. CDC treats everyone the same. I don't. agreed, good poster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 You don't ask until the deal is agreed upon. Then it's completed after a quick consult with the family. Pretty fast process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonny_Bohonos_14 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 "Would you be open to waiving?" vs "Will you waive" Two different questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.