kingofsurrey Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Most talented 3 Canucks all time may be a SURPRISE TO SOME >>>>> If you judge by points per game.... which makes sense. Bure 1.12 pts per game Gradin .90 pts per game Tanti . 89 pts per game Sorry no Hank ( . 83 pts per game ) or Danny.... ( .83 - pts/game ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Dizzle Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Thanks for the laugh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spotted Zebra Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 It took Lee Sweatt 1 game to get his first NHL goal. Took that bum Bure 4. why don't you just re title this thread "I hate the Sedins" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quoted Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 You need to correct for era somehow (only semi-joking)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Pavel,Hank and Danny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsurrey Posted February 17, 2016 Author Share Posted February 17, 2016 2 minutes ago, Spotted Zebra said: It took Lee Sweatt 1 game to get his first NHL goal. Took that bum Bure 4. why don't you just re title this thread "I hate the Sedins" Would you not agree to judge the most talent Canuck of all time.... to judge by point per game played..... Would that not be a fair judge of Talent.... ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 2 minutes ago, Spotted Zebra said: It took Lee Sweatt 1 game to get his first NHL goal. Took that bum Bure 4. why don't you just re title this thread "I hate the Sedins" Nice Lee Sweatt anecdote! trivia material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Where the !@#$ is Jason Herter??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsurrey Posted February 17, 2016 Author Share Posted February 17, 2016 Even Bert and Nazzy had higher point per game than Hank and Danny have now...... Just sayin. Hank and Danny would be tied for 6th on the canucks for points per game. Just sayin. Let the facts speak. This is talking Talent...... Not successful careers... that would be measured by total points in career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quoted Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 3 minutes ago, kingofsurrey said: Would you not agree to judge the most talent Canuck of all time.... to judge by point per game played..... Would that not be a fair judge of Talent.... ?? It's one judge of talent (specifically point production). but not the only one. Maybe placement in the scoring race would be better as that corrects for the rest of the league and the era. How about, who led team's to President's Cups? Not Bure, Tanti, or Gradin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 10 minutes ago, kingofsurrey said: Most talented 3 Canucks all time may be a SURPRISE TO SOME >>>>> If you judge by points per game.... which makes sense. Bure 1.12 pts per game Gradin .90 pts per game Tanti . 89 pts per game Sorry no Hank ( . 83 pts per game ) or Danny.... ( .83 - pts/game ) Excellent post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 3 minutes ago, MJDDawg said: Where the !@#$ is Jason Herter??? Hanging with Harold Druken! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Time Lord Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 The Sedins blossomed late. Their primes were better than any other Canuck's prime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yes we can nucks Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 You missed Taylor Fedun! 1.0 pts per game with Canucks. One of the all time greats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spotted Zebra Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 10 minutes ago, kingofsurrey said: Would you not agree to judge the most talent Canuck of all time.... to judge by point per game played..... Would that not be a fair judge of Talent.... ?? No. You judge that by how good were you when you were at your best. Only Bure can top Hank and not by much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quoted Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 2 minutes ago, Spotted Zebra said: No. You judge that by how good were you when you were at your best. Only Bure can top Hank and not by much. Bure was waaaay faster though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOgRook Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 18 minutes ago, kingofsurrey said: Most talented 3 Canucks all time may be a SURPRISE TO SOME >>>>> If you judge by points per game.... which makes sense. Bure 1.12 pts per game Gradin .90 pts per game Tanti . 89 pts per game Sorry no Hank ( . 83 pts per game ) or Danny.... ( .83 - pts/game ) I was starting to have faith in you and actually thought I might come into a good start to a thread, but leaving off the Sedins from your top three is suspect at best, almost like there's an elephant in the room 9 minutes ago, kingofsurrey said: Would you not agree to judge the most talent Canuck of all time.... to judge by point per game played..... Would that not be a fair judge of Talent.... ?? If that's how you wanna judge it, then change the title of the thread to "Most points per game". If it makes you feel better Bure belongs their even if your method for including is flawed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksLegacy Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 Different "eras" of hockey. Would Gradin or Tanti be able to produce at a similar rate in today's game? Perhaps the Sedins would thrive even more if they played in an earlier era. I think it was in an interview during NBA All-Star weekend when Michael Jordan said (paraphrasing) there isn't really one greatest of all time. There's a greatest within an era because sports is constantly changing and evolving. PPG should be one factor you take into consideration when you determine talent level but it shouldn't be the end all be all imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsurrey Posted February 17, 2016 Author Share Posted February 17, 2016 I unlike some of you REVISIONISTS prefer to deal in FACTS. HERE ARE The FACTS Bure, Gradin, Tanti are the most talented Canuck Forwards of all time as they have the highest points per game. Sadly they did not have the long careers of Hank and Danny. PROOF - Top in alltime points per GAME played. Hank and Danny have had the best 2 Forwards Careers all time on the canucks . PROOF - Top in alltime points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuporbust Posted February 17, 2016 Share Posted February 17, 2016 56 minutes ago, kingofsurrey said: Even Bert and Nazzy had higher point per game than Hank and Danny have now...... Just sayin. Hank and Danny would be tied for 6th on the canucks for points per game. Just sayin. Let the facts speak. This is talking Talent...... Not successful careers... that would be measured by total points in career. No they don't. Sedins have played longer here , and were developed here. U take ppg in there prime ( best year) . That's a more accurate , and still not completely accurate. They have played here well past their prime. Looks like I have to make a graph again. Who has had more seasons with higher point totals overall ? Who played more games without getting injured , or played injured ? And on and on. This thread is rediculous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.