orcasgonewild Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 Expansion draft looming at the end of the season and it's pretty obvious Hansen or sbisa will not be on this team anymore, that's obvious. Maguire from tsn has said that contenders will be more open to moving their 1st round pick this year because of the weakness of this draft. I agree cuz this year's first round is like the 2nd round of any other year. Out of sbisa and Hansen both have played well this season and both can handle large and short minutes. Hansen is more valuable tho and teams like chicago, L.A., montreal, ottawa, Washington Minnesota and st Louis could all use scoring help. I suggest trading him at the deadline for a first. Some if u may question that but I do think that his contract and his versatility makes him worth a 1st. To canucks Late 1st To playoff team Hansen Id suggest trading sbisa to a team that needs defence Like boston. To canucks Anders Bjork (Google him) Anders Bjork is pretty good, I've been keeping up with his games and he looks good. To boston Sbisa And id also try to get a Miller deal done to L.A. TO CANUCKS (late 1ST) but probably 2nd or 3rd To L.A. Miller And in off season canucks NEED TO SIGN ZACH ASTON REESE next year's potential lines Baertschi(47) horvat(53) boeser(42) Sedins(22+33) Eriksson(21) Granlund(60) Sutter(20) virtanen(18) Bjork(38) gaudette(45) Aston-Reese(12) (what a beautiful 4th line) Edler stecher Tryamkin Tanev Hutton Gudbranson Marky 4th could outscore the 3rd line and maybe 2nd if they slump again Virtanen had a chubby summer gaining fat not muscle but he's really slimmed down and he's 210 now. Draft Well with 2 1st round picks and 2 2nds Maybe Hague,Foote, comtois, glass, strome or popugaev Team has a nice future while not getting any worse plus a lot of under 25 players that will bring excitement for new season Lost: Hansen Sbisa Miller Skille Megna (-_-) Chaput Gain: Zach Aston-Reese Boeser Bjork Gaudette 1st 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Ryan Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 Hansen has openly said, he likes it here...he has an NTC and Benning has said he's not talking anyone out of them. So, if no one comes through with an offer that blows the team away...AND Hansen agrees, then he's here for awhile. Is he worth a 1st? Maybe, to the right team and after that team knows their direct competition wants him also. Otherwise no. Sbisa...ok I see trading him, and even agree with it. He's superfluous to the team right now, and holding up the promotion of others. Since he's got a contract that has turned out to be just a little excessive, instead of downright criminal...and he's improved, then maybe a low 2nd from a team that is right on the cusp and needs to improve their 5-6 defenseman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Ross Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 I like what your doing and I do agree this year's draft is weak. I like how u mapped everything out nicely and the trades are pretty good as well. I like the additions of Zach Aston-Reese and bjork. If benning did this Id be really happy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 Begs the question, what would these two fetch in a package, especially if you kept sweetening? Mtl, for example: -Take back the expiring Desharnais contract (3.5 mill AAV) -Retain a mill on either Jannik, or Luca If sweetened enough, perhaps you can get in on a Juulsen & Scherbak package? I don't pretend to know precise valuations(Qwijbo will show up surely, to bring this to my attn!); but we should swing for the fences, perhaps helping another team in 3 or 4 ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted February 3, 2017 Author Share Posted February 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, Father Ryan said: Hansen has openly said, he likes it here...he has an NTC and Benning has said he's not talking anyone out of them. So, if no one comes through with an offer that blows the team away...AND Hansen agrees, then he's here for awhile. Is he worth a 1st? Maybe, to the right team and after that team knows their direct competition wants him also. Otherwise no. Sbisa...ok I see trading him, and even agree with it. He's superfluous to the team right now, and holding up the promotion of others. Since he's got a contract that has turned out to be just a little excessive, instead of downright criminal...and he's improved, then maybe a low 2nd from a team that is right on the cusp and needs to improve their 5-6 defenseman. Trevor linden himself in a new interview was talking about sbisa and Hansen and how they were probably the odd men out bcuz he wants to protect Baertschi and Granlund. But I like ur comment because it sheds light on things I didn't go into much detail with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted February 3, 2017 Author Share Posted February 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said: Begs the question, what would these two fetch in a package, especially if you kept sweetening? Mtl, for example: -Take back the expiring Desharnais contract (3.5 mill AAV) -Retain a mill on either Jannik, or Luca If sweetened enough, perhaps you can get in on a Juulsen & Scherbak package? I don't pretend to know precise valuations(Qwijbo will show up surely, to bring this to my attn!); but we should swing for the fences, perhaps helping another team in 3 or 4 ways. I like the way u think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fateless Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 5 minutes ago, Father Ryan said: Hansen has openly said, he likes it here...he has an NTC and Benning has said he's not talking anyone out of them. Just a reminder that Hansen has a modified NTC (must give a list of 8 teams). Someone else mentioned it on Twitter yesterday and I concur that Benning could avoid being called a liar while still trading Hansen as moving Hansen to one of the teams on his list is not having him waive his NTC, it simply complies with its terms. I'm really hoping that is the way Benning sees it because if we lose Hansen this off-season with no return (like Hamhuis and Vrbata), I'm going to really questioning our managements competency when it comes to asset management. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 4 minutes ago, Fateless said: Just a reminder that Hansen has a modified NTC (must give a list of 8 teams). Someone else mentioned it on Twitter yesterday and I concur that Benning could avoid being called a liar while still trading Hansen as moving Hansen to one of the teams on his list is not having him waive his NTC, it simply complies with its terms. I'm really hoping that is the way Benning sees it because if we lose Hansen this off-season with no return (like Hamhuis and Vrbata), I'm going to really questioning our managements competency when it comes to asset management. He has to ask him for the list. This is Hansen's understanding: “It’s nice that you don’t have to speculate as to whether they’re going to come in five days or five weeks to ask you for a list of (trade) teams.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted February 3, 2017 Author Share Posted February 3, 2017 4 minutes ago, Fateless said: Just a reminder that Hansen has a modified NTC (must give a list of 8 teams). Someone else mentioned it on Twitter yesterday and I concur that Benning could avoid being called a liar while still trading Hansen as moving Hansen to one of the teams on his list is not having him waive his NTC, it simply complies with its terms. I'm really hoping that is the way Benning sees it because if we lose Hansen this off-season with no return (like Hamhuis and Vrbata), I'm going to really questioning our managements competency when it comes to asset management. Exactly!! We can't afford to give pieces away. Sbisa and Hansen have good trade value right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sedinyoureyesontheprize Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 waive daniel and henrik save hansen & sbisa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 I can't see Hansen being left unprotected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted February 3, 2017 Author Share Posted February 3, 2017 14 minutes ago, ajhockey said: I can't see Hansen being left unprotected. Same but linden said himself that it would suck to lose a young player. And when asked about sbisa and Hansen it seemed as if he was agreeing they were the odd men out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 34 minutes ago, orcasgonewild said: Same but linden said himself that it would suck to lose a young player. And when asked about sbisa and Hansen it seemed as if he was agreeing they were the odd men out They probably are. Once management decides who they are going to expose, then those guys are going to have to decide if they want to risk going to Vegas, which is going to be very bad for a while, or to a contender. Pretty sure they will pick contender. I don't think we can get 3 1st round picks in any draft year for these guys but I'd be happy with 1 and some lower rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 hansen at deadline will be worth more than a 1st make teams overpay i say he gets a decent prospect and a late first. edler wont waive his ntc so tanev or sbisa to higest bidder id rather trade tanev because he brings no offense. hansen to caps for 1st and a decent prospect tanev to blues for shattenkirk and a 2nd conditional that he signs extension sbisa to leafs for a 2nd and 3rd burrows to habs for a 3rd and b level prospect miller to ducks for 2nd plus our 1st 2nd and jackets 2nd 2 firsts, 5 seconds, 2 thirds plenty of fresh prospects for benning to grab protect sedin sedin granlund baertchi erikkson sutter horvat edler shattenkirk guddy marky team next yr baertchi horvat eriksson sedin sutter boeser virtanen sedin granlund gaunce ____ ______ ______ edler shattenkirk juolevi gudbranson hutton tryamkin stecher markstrom _____ we keep getting younger and get more offensive dcorp could resign miller burrows july first to cheap last contracts if not plenty of players available in free agency. benning gets a ton of picks to find draft gems exposed dorsett, biega, larsen, gaunce, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Soldier Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 People who imagine Gaudette stepping in and being immediately awesome are the same who thought the same of Cassels because of that Memorial Cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrible.dee Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 3 hours ago, Fateless said: Just a reminder that Hansen has a modified NTC (must give a list of 8 teams). Someone else mentioned it on Twitter yesterday and I concur that Benning could avoid being called a liar while still trading Hansen as moving Hansen to one of the teams on his list is not having him waive his NTC, it simply complies with its terms. I'm really hoping that is the way Benning sees it because if we lose Hansen this off-season with no return (like Hamhuis and Vrbata), I'm going to really questioning our managements competency when it comes to asset management. I'm still speechless that we lost Hamhuis for nothing With the prices D-men go for at the deadline and what a solid all-around play in any situation player he is, that was a first rounder down the toilet. And don't give me the NTC BS if he knew he wasn't coming back and had plenty of notice then he would have gone, Vrbata could have been a 2nd, The pens would have taken him and Hamhuis together I think for a solid return All assets down the crapper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 3 minutes ago, terrible.dee said: I'm still speechless that we lost Hamhuis for nothing With the prices D-men go for at the deadline and what a solid all-around play in any situation player he is, that was a first rounder down the toilet. And don't give me the NTC BS if he knew he wasn't coming back and had plenty of notice then he would have gone, Vrbata could have been a 2nd, The pens would have taken him and Hamhuis together I think for a solid return All assets down the crapper I think we are going to be disappointed at the TDL again. But it's going to be a double disappointment when Sbisa is selected by Vegas, and we look back knowing JB missed on getting value for another lost asset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrible.dee Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 1 hour ago, canuktravella said: hansen at deadline will be worth more than a 1st make teams overpay i say he gets a decent prospect and a late first. edler wont waive his ntc so tanev or sbisa to higest bidder id rather trade tanev because he brings no offense. hansen to caps for 1st and a decent prospect tanev to blues for shattenkirk and a 2nd conditional that he signs extension sbisa to leafs for a 2nd and 3rd burrows to habs for a 3rd and b level prospect miller to ducks for 2nd plus our 1st 2nd and jackets 2nd 2 firsts, 5 seconds, 2 thirds plenty of fresh prospects for benning to grab protect sedin sedin granlund baertchi erikkson sutter horvat edler shattenkirk guddy marky team next yr baertchi horvat eriksson sedin sutter boeser virtanen sedin granlund gaunce ____ ______ ______ edler shattenkirk juolevi gudbranson hutton tryamkin stecher markstrom _____ we keep getting younger and get more offensive dcorp could resign miller burrows july first to cheap last contracts if not plenty of players available in free agency. benning gets a ton of picks to find draft gems exposed dorsett, biega, larsen, gaunce, Burrows and Miller both add a LOT to the team so far as character is concerned. That's a term that gets thrown around a lot, but when the going gets tough, it;'s Burrows who butt ends the guy who cheap shots our star, it's Miller charging into the scuffle with a guy twice his size when our rookie D man is being pushed around. Funny after all this time the biggest physical deterrent on our team is probably Burrows, players would be nervous to take a cheap shot at our stars with him in the game, simply because they know he's a guy that will hurt them if need be, there aren't many guys left in the league like that. None of those guys are afraid to fight anyone, that isn't a deterrent, but they don't want their knee torn up from a slew foot or wrist broken from a slash, and Burrows is one of the few guys left that will go there, as we saw in the Leafs game, that actually does scare other players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrible.dee Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 7 minutes ago, Alflives said: I think we are going to be disappointed at the TDL again. But it's going to be a double disappointment when Sbisa is selected by Vegas, and we look back knowing JB missed on getting value for another lost asset. I don't know, some other poster said something about "We might get lucky and they'll take Dorsett" Expansion teams need fighters, they bond with the crowd and are instantly the most popular players, Dorsett has that small guy big heart storyline going that new fans can instantly pick up on and get behind. I'm really thinking that by the time they get to us it might be Dorsett who goes, Or Benning could do the right thing and leave Gudbransson unprotected, apparently he wasn't a raise next year, but doesn't feel like he should learn to play hockey first. That's instant trade repellant, he isn't going to help us, and he'll have to be qualified at more than he currently makes wasting both a roster spot and cap space on a guy who looks like he should be a Norris winner but then the whistle blows and you realize he has no idea what he's doing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 ive said the same. both should be moved sbisa doesnt have a ntc so he fits the bill to deal at the deadline. send him away for a pick hansen. ntc says he can submit an 8 team list to trade to and benning said that stuff to protect his players from the media. SO benning didnt say he isnt going to ask a player for his OK list. trading hansen to one of his 8 teams would not be asking him to waive his ntc, trading him to the other 22 teams who require him to waive his ntc also benning could go to miller, burrows, hansen and be like "hey man, we know what we said and were not asking you to waive BUT if you want to win a cup or a change just come to us and we'll make that happen" no, im not a lawyer. im just that good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.