Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Enter Search Term. Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. If no results appear, use Enter to do a full site search.
Forum Closure ×
Canucks Community
Forum Closure

‘This is not going to be won militarily’: Top US commander in Afghanistan reveals pessimism

Ryan Strome

By Ryan Strome
in Off-Topic General

Recommended Posts

Ryan Strome Canucks All-Star

Ryan Strome

Posted
Posted

The new U.S. general leading the mission in Afghanistan gave a surprisingly candid interview this week on the situation in-country.

In his first interview since taking command of NATO’s Resolute Support mission in September, Army Gen. Austin Miller’s thoughts seem to mirror the pessimism felt by the American people as the war in Afghanistan treads past the 17-year mark.

“This is not going to be won militarily,” Miller told NBC News in an exclusive interview. “This is going to a political solution."

“My assessment is the Taliban also realizes they cannot win militarily,” he said. "So if you realize you can’t win militarily at some point, fighting is just, people start asking why. So you do not necessarily wait us out, but I think now is the time to start working through the political piece of this conflict.”

Miller’s comments reflect several realities portrayed in the latest report from the leading U.S. government oversight agency on Afghanistan.

 

As of July, the Afghan government controls or influences only 55.5 percent of the country’s 407 districts.

That is the lowest level since the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, or SIGAR, began tracking district control in November 2015, according to the group’s quarterly report released Thursday.

Although the exact numbers are classified, Resolute Support also said that the average number of Afghan government force casualties from May to October 2018 is the highest it has ever been during similar periods.

May was the most active month, accounting for 26 percent of all casualties during this five-month period. About 52 percent of the casualties during this time came during checkpoint operations, while 35 percent occurred during patrols.

SIGAR reported that the number of checkpoint casualties is increasing while the number of patrol casualties is decreasing.

 

The somewhat good news is that the Afghan government’s control over the total population in-country remains unchanged since this time last year at 65 percent.

 

 

Roughly 12 percent of Afghanistan’s districts are now reportedly under insurgent control or influence, according to SIGAR.

About 32.4 percent of Afghan districts are contested — which means they are neither controlled by the Afghan government or the insurgency.

Since SIGAR began receiving district control data in November 2015, Afghan government control and influence over its districts has declined by about 16 percent; contested districts have increased by about 11 percent; and insurgent control or influence has risen by 5.5 percent.

“The control of Afghanistan’s districts, population, and territory overall became more contested this quarter, with both the Afghan government and the insurgency losing districts and land area under their control or influence,” SIGAR officials wrote in their report.

 

When Miller took over the war in early September, Afghan soldiers were already being killed and wounded at record numbers.

Miller told NBC News that he kicked off his tenure by pushing out a more aggressive policy of helping the Afghan military locate and defeat Taliban fighters. But in that new interview, Miller also acknowledged that Afghanistan requires a political, not military, solution to its woes.

 

Miller also narrowly escaped a Taliban attack unharmed on Oct. 18 in Kandahar city during a meeting with Kandahar’s governor. The Taliban had managed to turn one of the governor’s bodyguards to their side, who then initiated an insider attack at the conclusion of the meeting.

 

A key U.S.-backed Afghan warlord in the country’s volatile southern region, Kandahar police chief Gen. Abdul Raziq, was killed in the attack. Raziq was arguably the most important power broker in the region.

Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Smiley, the U.S. general in charge of Resolute Support’s advising mission in southern Afghanistan, and another unidentified civilian were also wounded in the attack.

 

Afghanistan’s summer fighting season was also marked by a notable loss for Afghanistan’s elite Commando units, who were routed in their defense of Ghazni city, less than 100 miles from Afghanistan’s capital of Kabul, from a Taliban offensive in August.

Although the Commandos eventually rallied to retake the city with the help of U.S. special operations forces, the fact that such an elite unit was overrun and reportedly took a high rate of casualties may indicate fatigue and overuse among its troops.

 

The cumulative funds allocated for reconstruction and related activities in Afghanistan since fiscal 2002 totals roughly $132 billion, according to SIGAR.

 

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-air-force/2018/11/01/this-is-not-going-to-be-won-militarily-top-us-commander-in-afghanistan-reveals-pessimism/

 

After 17 years of war, top US commander in Afghanistan admits Taliban cannot be defeated

https://www.rt.com/usa/442939-miller-afghanistan-war-lost-taliban/

 

*****************************

 

The British failed, the Soviets failed and now NATO and the US has failed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gaudette Celly Canucks Hall-of-Famer

Gaudette Celly

Posted
Posted

Pfft, like it had anything to do with 911 or the Taliban in the first place.  They told Bush and Powell they would hand OBL over if they could provide evidence he was involved -- they never did, but invaded anyway.  Bush even decided the day BEFORE 911 to invade, the plans were already drawn up.  Got their pipeline built, more money for all their weapons-producing friends, and ramped up heroin production and export for the CIA.  And we wonder why there's suddenly this opioid crisis going on.  Even that clown Geraldo Rivera reported on it, but nobody listens or stops to think.

 

There's zero reason for them to "claim victory" or leave; too much benefit and too many people making money out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ryan Strome Canucks All-Star

Ryan Strome

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said:

It makes you wonder if the lesson will ever be learned that these types of wars never get "won". But maybe thats the point, its good for the US economy. Other than the long-term debt part of course.

 

 

When it comes to war it seems lessons are never learned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kloubek Canucks First-Line

kloubek

Posted
Posted

No big surprise here.  Fighting against a country militarily works because one side will surrender, the war is over, and then everyone rebuilds.  When fighting against a movement or an ideology, they don't simply give it up that mindset. It's the same reason fighting rages on in Iraq and is the same reason that ISIS won't ever truly be defeated.... at least, not for at least one or two generations or more. The most you can ever hope for militarily is a reduction in "symptoms" but at the end of the day there is no way to kill the virus. So you learn coping mechanisms on dealing with the virus and that's diplomacy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ghostsof1915 Canucks Hall-of-Famer

Ghostsof1915

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hutton Wink said:

Pfft, like it had anything to do with 911 or the Taliban in the first place.  They told Bush and Powell they would hand OBL over if they could provide evidence he was involved -- they never did, but invaded anyway.  Bush even decided the day BEFORE 911 to invade, the plans were already drawn up.  Got their pipeline built, more money for all their weapons-producing friends, and ramped up heroin production and export for the CIA.  And we wonder why there's suddenly this opioid crisis going on.  Even that clown Geraldo Rivera reported on it, but nobody listens or stops to think.

 

There's zero reason for them to "claim victory" or leave; too much benefit and too many people making money out of it.

In other words. War is a racket. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewbieCanuckFan Canucks All-Star

NewbieCanuckFan

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Ryan Strome said:

What gloves? Using nukes? The Americans and the Soviets have bombed the hell out of that country. The enemy in these battles are born everyday.

And people assume the Soviets exercised any kind of restraint that the Americans will have to operate under & they still couldn't win - assuming the conflict stayed non-nuclear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
butters Canucks Rookie

butters

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Ryan Strome said:

What gloves? Using nukes? The Americans and the Soviets have bombed the hell out of that country. The enemy in these battles are born everyday.

total war, complete killing of everyone in the country. Wouldn't even take nukes. It would never happen. But if the US had the will to do it and the lack of moral restraint, they absolutely could.

 

9 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said:

If the gloves came off, other countries gloves would come off, and pretty soon all that would remain of those gloves would be ashes.

sure, but the point is that guerilla attacks are only effective because the invading countries are reluctant to engage in wholesale slaughter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...