70seven Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Pearson for debrusk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bishopshodan Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 I hope we move him. Not a big fan of his play. Seems slow to me, chip and chase type guy with not much fire in his eyes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted March 21, 2022 Author Share Posted March 21, 2022 3 minutes ago, 70seven said: Pearson for debrusk Why? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny in Vancouver Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 1 hour ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: According to reports, the Canucks have asked Tanner Pearson to waive his no trade clause. No clue how reliable the source is, but I figured it was worth a thread since we don't currently have a rumor thread for Pearson. I read somewhere years ago that it's common for GM's to ask all players (or maybe the agents?) with NTC (and NMC?) which teams they would be willing to waive their NTC for when it's really close to the trade deadline. Personally, I think that seems disruptive as the player and his family now starts worrying. Has anyone heard this as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70seven Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, 48MPHSlapShot said: Why? Younger faster 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted March 21, 2022 Author Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, 70seven said: Younger faster And more expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 1 minute ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: Why? debrusk is better. Younger, faster, plays a more aggressive game. It's a win for us for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, Alflives said: debrusk is better. Younger, faster, plays a more aggressive game. It's a win for us for sure. garland for debrusk is a win for us? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, 48MPHSlapShot said: And more expensive. So. He's way better. If it's Pearson for Debrusk that's a win for us. Then trade Garland for cap room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 (edited) 1 minute ago, Canucks Curse said: garland for debrusk is a win for us? Pearson Edited March 21, 2022 by Alflives 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted March 21, 2022 Author Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, Alflives said: debrusk is better. Younger, faster, plays a more aggressive game. It's a win for us for sure. He's also more expensive, doesnt play as heavy of a game, and he produces at about the same clip as Pearson. Does he play the PK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted March 21, 2022 Author Share Posted March 21, 2022 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Yup. Now you're just taking the piss 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 2 minutes ago, Canucks Curse said: garland Pearson for debrusk is a win for us? fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, 48MPHSlapShot said: Now you're just taking the piss The conversation was Pearson for deBrusk. Not Garland. Old Alfer got tricked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure_of_94 Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 1 minute ago, Alflives said: fixed. Nice job Aaron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted March 21, 2022 Author Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, Alflives said: The conversation was Pearson for deBrusk. Not Garland. Old Alfer got tricked. Fair enough, but I still think it'd be a lateral move. I'd rather get a prospect or pick for Pearson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 6 minutes ago, Alflives said: So. He's way better. If it's Pearson for Debrusk that's a win for us. Then trade Garland for cap room. if thats the sequence I'm OK with it. Get a bit bigger up front, make some cap room for other deals in the summer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 3 minutes ago, Bure_of_94 said: Nice job Aaron. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Just now, JM_ said: if thats the sequence I'm OK with it. Get a bit bigger up front, make some cap room for other deals in the summer. It's the similar way we got Dermott. One deal balances with another. Pearson for deBrusk Garland for prospects/picks (cap room) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bishopshodan Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 I think Pearson for Debrusk would be great. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now