Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[PGT] Vancouver Canucks at Minnesota Wild | Mar. 24, 2022

Rate this topic


-Vintage Canuck-

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, HKSR said:

I'm ok swapping Crouse for Garland.  I think offensively, they contribute about the same.  I think it'd be costly to acquire Crouse though.  It would probably start with Hoglander and a 1st. 

Not sold on Crouse. He’s drastically underwhelmed up until now. This would be the epitome of buying high. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Beary Sweet said:

Big game tomorrow against Dallas. They have 3 games in hand on us and we face them 2 more times(including tomorrow’s game). Need to find a way to win if we want some playoff hockey 

Got to win all three, and in regulation.  If we can do that we can catch that bunch of losers.  If not, then we are the losers. 

It will help having Woody.  Need that guy Bonner too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alflives said:

Mackinnon will definitely be guarding the cookie jar.  :lol:

Next time the Av's are in Rogers someone should throw a pizza on the ice and really scare the $&!# out of MacKinnon.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. What a dramatic difference in the dynamics of the former "Motto" line with Richardson as the 3rd with Lammy and Highmore. Not as energetic.  Effective in their purpose, but not as exciting to watch....aroo........whirrrrr...whirrrrr......whirrrrr.

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sativika said:

Wow. What a dramatic difference in the dynamics of the former "Motto" line with Richardson as the 3rd with Lammy and Highmore. Not as energetic.  Effective in their purpose, but not as exciting to watch....aroo........whirrrrr...whirrrrr......whirrrrr.

 

 

Drinking too much is bad for your liver. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Devron said:

Exactly, there’s no certain age group. In fact you need a variety. This guy is comparing apples and oranges.

 

Building around Petey, Hughes and Demko here on out. We should keep growing as a team and It’s definitely possible Miller is here for that even at the end of his career. 
 

Anyways I’m done with that fella. Saying a player like Pettersson is trash. There is no reasoning with that. I just find it incredibly ignorant. If he can’t see it. It ain’t my problem.

I dont know why you question other people's hockey knowledge while you have no clue at all, Honestly getting in a debate with you is like talking to a wall. Half the time I don't even know WTF you are rambling about. "Building around Petey, Hughes" --Just riding you a bit, but I doubt anyone knows who or what this team really is, other than soft, terrible defensively and inconsistent. They have 2 players on the team, that what did you say the other day? low IQ? like yourself, think they are absolutely fantastic. One of them is a defenseman that is absolutely clueless when it comes to actually defending, the other is as skinny as a rake and can't stay on his feet and is a bit injury prone due to how frail he is.
Neither are players you should build around as both are PP specialists, one is passable as a 1st line LW or 3LC, the other is a #5 defenseman. Again, I don’t think you “build around” Pettersson and Hughes, they’re just simply good YOUNG players who add value to any team. Now, the rest of the team needs a total makeover though. That being said, if you can sell them you’re going full- rebuild…Aquilini won’t allow that.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sxqhfeh said:

I dont know why you question other people's hockey knowledge while you have no clue at all, Honestly getting in a debate with you is like talking to a wall. Half the time I don't even know WTF you are rambling about. "Building around Petey, Hughes" --Just riding you a bit, but I doubt anyone knows who or what this team really is, other than soft, terrible defensively and inconsistent. They have 2 players on the team, that what did you say the other day? low IQ? like yourself, think they are absolutely fantastic. One of them is a defenseman that is absolutely clueless when it comes to actually defending, the other is as skinny as a rake and can't stay on his feet and is a bit injury prone due to how frail he is.
Neither are players you should build around as both are PP specialists, one is passable as a 1st line LW or 3LC, the other is a #5 defenseman. Again, I don’t think you “build around” Pettersson and Hughes, they’re just simply good YOUNG players who add value to any team. Now, the rest of the team needs a total makeover though. That being said, if you can sell them you’re going full- rebuild…Aquilini won’t allow that.

too much to read but i'm guessing it's funny!  :lol:

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said:

Canucks will need 98 points to make it. So 27/32 points. They will need to run the table.  12-1-3. 13-2-1. 
 

With Petan, Chiasson and Hunt in the lineup the odds are probably the same as winning the lotto 6/49. 

If they beat Stars/Vegas at least 4 out of 5 games they don’t need to go on that type of run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Odd. said:

If they beat Stars/Vegas at least 4 out of 5 games they don’t need to go on that type of run. 

Vegas is not currently in a playoff spot. So they are not one of the teams they are chasing. Even if they beat Dallas in both games, Dallas still has 3 games in hand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...