TOMapleLaughs Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Meh. Roy's no answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Shannon knows nothing about the Canucks at all but moving Kesler to the wing is a possibility I believe. But it would probably take more than Roy to make that happen..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 I actually think Roy would benefit Kes on the wing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckofSteel Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 The OP has taken what John Shannon said out of context. John Shannon did talk about how Kesler could move to the wing and that Roy could centre the second line, but after that he also said that Roy can be a very effective THIRD line centre. John Shannon pretty much said moving Kesler to wing is a option if they acquire Roy, otherwise he said Roy would be a good third line centre because of the aggressive game he plays. By aggressive Shannon meant that Roy is not afraid to go to the dirty areas and will work hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 How about signing Arnott for the rest of the season to be the #2 center. I'm aware that he didn't pass his physical with the Rangers. He would bring alot of experience, has won a Stanley Cup. Don't think he would cost alot for remainder of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Brahma Bull Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 I would not be surprised to see us lose Tanev in a trade. He is a really good defensemen with huge trade value right now. In a team like ours, A top 6 forward is worth more then a long term defensemen if we want a cup that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 If gillis were to get Arnott he would look like a hypocrit, given his stance on Malhotra's status. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Shannon's been drinking the CDCoolaid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 If gillis were to get Arnott he would look like a hypocrit, given his stance on Malhotra's status. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmm Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Most trade deadlines nowadays are lame. It's overhyped, GM's ask for way too much. Its still fun to get excited over, but they are usually dissapointing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimberWolf Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Canucks always seem to do something during the deadline in the last few seasons: Lappy/Higgy and the Hodgson trade for example. I don't think much will happen this year, but I can't blame anyone for getting excited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pouria Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 I would not be surprised to see us lose Tanev in a trade. He is a really good defensemen with huge trade value right now. In a team like ours, A top 6 forward is worth more then a long term defensemen if we want a cup that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pouria Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Tanev isn't going anywhere. He's an incredible d-man. Much better than the majority of the D we have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pouria Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 How about signing Arnott for the rest of the season to be the #2 center. I'm aware that he didn't pass his physical with the Rangers. He would bring alot of experience, has won a Stanley Cup. Don't think he would cost alot for remainder of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pouria Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 And who do you suggest we get? And what are you willing to give up? Because no NHL team is going to just give away a #2 centre for Raymond, Ballard and a 1st. Unless he's - over the hill - ufa in the offseason No more rentals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Not that I think arnott should be signed but he doesn't have a debilitating eye injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xur Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 So you want to trade our best defenseman this season to get a top 6 forward? A young, cheap and good defenseman like Tanev who has steadily improved his game and will likely be even better in the future? I think you should go back to watching your sesame street show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccc44 Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Actually, most people want Kesler on the wing with a playmaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nino Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Most people on CDC ? who cares what most of the kids of CDC want You dont move selke award winning centers to the wing you add a playmaking winger to there line instead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riviera82 Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 Why can't someone, anyone want Lou? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.