Xbox Posted December 21, 2013 Share Posted December 21, 2013 check the Gaunce thread, I replied pretty well with some solid videos on him. Seriously looking at him it's hard to believe anyone would want to trade him on one hand, yet on another complain we need a serious 3rd line C. That being said, Shinkaruk is really the only prospect i'd give up in a trade for Kane. I consider anyone else untouchable On mobile, but I'll check them out when I am on my computer. I am a huge fan of Shinkaruk and I don't wanna trade him, but Kane is Kane lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peaches5 Posted December 21, 2013 Share Posted December 21, 2013 I said it before, and I'll say it again: Kane -for- Kassian, Guance, and Hansen Only trade that makes sense from both sides. Cap wouldn't even be an issue if the trade was made closer to the deadline. I think before WPG considers it you would have to have add Tanev and 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayRayDown Posted December 21, 2013 Share Posted December 21, 2013 I think before WPG considers it you would have to have add Tanev and 1st No way Evander Kane is worth Tanev, Kassian, Hansen, Gaunce and a 1st. I wouldn't pay that price even if he was worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted December 21, 2013 Share Posted December 21, 2013 Oh really. Would you trade Kesler for a package that includes a #4-#5 defenceman, two late first round picks, as well as two b prospects? Well if it makes the team better,gets us a cup then HELL YEAH!The bruins did that and what happened they got better and a cup!Depth is better then one player on a team and smart GM's know that!!I would give up more then most would want as we have depth.Saying that I would also like MG to trade ageing players at the end of the year or next year.Kesler is at the top of his game right now and I would like MG to ask him for a list incase!I hate seeing us keep players to long and get nothing for them.Me kesler would be traded this year if we get a deal we can't say no to, or in the off season cause he would be worth more to us trading him with young players coming up to get a deal for depth or more young guns! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted December 21, 2013 Share Posted December 21, 2013 Kassian + Burrows gets it done. That's the asking price if you don't want to move Horvat or Shinkaruk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peaches5 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 No way Evander Kane is worth Tanev, Kassian, Hansen, Gaunce and a 1st. I wouldn't pay that price even if he was worth it. He is 22 year old power forward who has already proven he can score 30+ goals. To put that into perspective Kassian is 22 years old and has yet to score 10 goals or even have a positive +/-. We can only hope that Kassian develops into half of what Evander Kane is going to be. You aren't really given up anything spectacular besides Tanev and how good he is going to be is completely unknown right now. That trade is a viable trade unlike people suggesting Burrows or Kesler who have full NTC's they are going no where. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 He is 22 year old power forward who has already proven he can score 30+ goals. To put that into perspective Kassian is 22 years old and has yet to score 10 goals or even have a positive +/-. We can only hope that Kassian develops into half of what Evander Kane is going to be. You aren't really given up anything spectacular besides Tanev and how good he is going to be is completely unknown right now. That trade is a viable trade unlike people suggesting Burrows or Kesler who have full NTC's they are going no where. But your talking about giving up an integral part of our D, our best 3rd liner and arguably one of our best top 6 plus a 1st plus a solid prospect. Keeping in mind Hansen's worth 20 goals in a good season and Burrows 30 and Kassian's unknown output and potential.... Just don't see it worth it. Huge pieces to give up for a young PWF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayRayDown Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 He is 22 year old power forward who has already proven he can score 30+ goals. To put that into perspective Kassian is 22 years old and has yet to score 10 goals or even have a positive +/-. We can only hope that Kassian develops into half of what Evander Kane is going to be. You aren't really given up anything spectacular besides Tanev and how good he is going to be is completely unknown right now. That trade is a viable trade unlike people suggesting Burrows or Kesler who have full NTC's they are going no where. proven he can score 30+? He has only scored 30 once. David Booth even scored 31 goals around age 24. Tanev, Gaunce, the 1st could all be better than Kane. I wouldn't give 5 pieces for a single player (Minus a few exceptions) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peaches5 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 But your talking about giving up an integral part of our D, our best 3rd liner and arguably one of our best top 6 plus a 1st plus a solid prospect. Keeping in mind Hansen's worth 20 goals in a good season and Burrows 30 and Kassian's unknown output and potential.... Just don't see it worth it. Huge pieces to give up for a young PWF. First off I didn't say anything about trading Burrows I said that no way he is going anywhere because he has a FULL NTC. Second big pieces would be Kesler, Sedins, Garrison... not a career 3rd line player like Hansen. Just look at what the Canucks line could be: Sedin - Sedin - Kane Higgins - Kesler - Santorelli Burrows - Richardson/Schroeder - Booth Welsh/Sestito - Dalpe - Weise Edler - Garrison Bieksa - Hamhuis Weber - Stanton Then Imagine in a few years Shinkaruk - Horvat - Kane. I would honestly try to not involve Tanev but I think that would be the deal breaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Defence wins championships. Edler - Bogosian Enstrom - Byfuglien Stuart - Trouba You can't tell me Winnipeg doesn't foam at the mouth at the thought of having that defence. They could even move Byfuglien back up to forward if they wanted to. They don't because in the end you need a balance in your offence as well. Vancouver has shown how important goal scoring is. We don't trade Kesler for D man do we? The Jets could turn around and trade a Dman, maybe Buff, to perhaps Philly, for a young stud forward. The trades would have more components but it's more than possible. such as kane who is already in their line up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peaches5 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 proven he can score 30+? He has only scored 30 once. David Booth even scored 31 goals around age 24. Tanev, Gaunce, the 1st could all be better than Kane. I wouldn't give 5 pieces for a single player (Minus a few exceptions) He scored 30 goals at age 20 in 74 games and you compare him to Booth. There are so many things wrong with that comparison, first off there is 4 year age difference! Scoring 30 goals at 20 is a lot more impressive than scoring it at 24. It wasn't like Booth was a one hit wonder he had a great year then he got KO'd by a hit to the head and then when he returned he got hit with a blind side head shot again and then last year he had another serious injury to his leg. Booth's career has been defined by injuries and in no way comparable to Evander Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted December 23, 2013 Share Posted December 23, 2013 Net summary of CDC opinion is that our biggest need currently is a big, dynamic scoring winger. Kane gets mentioned a lot, but like Kane presumably a big RW with speed and snipe to play with the Twins? Hey, Gillis IMO was near perfect this off season,returning to his quality GM form that brought us to the final, after 2 straight bad years. Lost his focus I guess??? Now Horvat looks great, but I'm saying we missed out on the BPA who fit our needs... http://www.nhl.com/i...id=nhl:topheads An 18 year old 6'4" scoring RW was available when we drafted, and has been good enough to play top line in the NHL and get 10 points in 10 games. Danny / Hank / Nichushkin Higgins / Kesler / Santorelli Booth / Richardson / Hansen Sestito / Dalpe / Kassian Burrows IR / Schroeder IR Weise, Welsh Forget 2015; How much better would we look right now if??? Just sayin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dank.sinatra Posted December 25, 2013 Share Posted December 25, 2013 Edlerzzzzzzzzzzz Boothy boy and a pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenDrinkin Posted December 27, 2013 Share Posted December 27, 2013 If this is true, we gotta make a deal !! I know he wouldn't come cheap, but make an offer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harmer Posted December 27, 2013 Share Posted December 27, 2013 Now that's a player this team should be drooling over. Hits, scores, fights, drives the net hard and can fly down the wing. He's everything we hoped Booth would be, again, plus he fights. Exactly this is just the player that we need to become legit again and considerd a cup contender again but sadly the price will be too high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00bxQb Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 Net summary of CDC opinion is that our biggest need currently is a big, dynamic scoring winger. Kane gets mentioned a lot, but like Kane presumably a big RW with speed and snipe to play with the Twins? Hey, Gillis IMO was near perfect this off season,returning to his quality GM form that brought us to the final, after 2 straight bad years. Lost his focus I guess??? Now Horvat looks great, but I'm saying we missed out on the BPA who fit our needs... http://www.nhl.com/i...id=nhl:topheads An 18 year old 6'4" scoring RW was available when we drafted, and has been good enough to play top line in the NHL and get 10 points in 10 games. Danny / Hank / Nichushkin Higgins / Kesler / Santorelli Booth / Richardson / Hansen Sestito / Dalpe / Kassian Burrows IR / Schroeder IR Weise, Welsh Forget 2015; How much better would we look right now if??? Just sayin. Nichushkin doesn't speak English very well and we have no Russians. Dallas has Gonchar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayRayDown Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 Net summary of CDC opinion is that our biggest need currently is a big, dynamic scoring winger. Kane gets mentioned a lot, but like Kane presumably a big RW with speed and snipe to play with the Twins? Hey, Gillis IMO was near perfect this off season,returning to his quality GM form that brought us to the final, after 2 straight bad years. Lost his focus I guess??? Now Horvat looks great, but I'm saying we missed out on the BPA who fit our needs... http://www.nhl.com/i...id=nhl:topheads An 18 year old 6'4" scoring RW was available when we drafted, and has been good enough to play top line in the NHL and get 10 points in 10 games. Danny / Hank / Nichushkin Higgins / Kesler / Santorelli Booth / Richardson / Hansen Sestito / Dalpe / Kassian Burrows IR / Schroeder IR Weise, Welsh Forget 2015; How much better would we look right now if??? Just sayin. How do we know if he was the BPA if Horvat hasn't played yet? Gillis doesn't have a crystal ball to predict that Burrows would be riddled with injury this season. Sedins-Kassian Higgins-Kesler-Burrows Booth-Santo-Hansen Sestito-Richardson-Weise Was what Gillis was probably expecting when he was drafting. Kassian would be no good learning on the 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted December 29, 2013 Share Posted December 29, 2013 Would honestly give them Gaunce 1st Tanev conditional 1st if Vancouver wins Stanely Cup, otherwise 2nd Jensen Buyout Booth, and our team looks like a contender for years Sedin Sedin Kassian Shinkuruk Horvat Kane Burrows Kesler Santorelli Higgins Richardson Hansen Edler Hamhuis Garrison Corrado Stanton Bieksa Subban No deal if Tanev is included Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken kaniff Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 Vancouver: LW Evander Kane Winnipeg: RW Alex Burrows, LW Hunter Shinkaruk, 2014 1st round draft pick or C Brendan Gaunce Vancouver: 2014 1st round draft pick, D Danny Dekeyser, LW Anthony Mantha Detroit: D Alex Edler, C Jordan Schroeder Daniel Sedin-Henrik Sedin-Evander Kane Chris Higgins-Ryan Kesler-Mike Santorelli Zack Kassian-Brad Richardson-Jannik Hansen Tom Sestito-Zac Dalpe-Dale Weise Jeremy Welsh Dan Hamhuis-Kevin Bieksa Jason Garrison-Danny Dekeyser Ryan Stanton-Chris Tanev Yannik Weber Andrew Alberts Roberto Luongo Eddie Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sick Hands Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 Vancouver: LW Evander Kane Winnipeg: RW Alex Burrows, LW Hunter Shinkaruk, 2014 1st round draft pick or C Brendan Gaunce Vancouver: 2014 1st round draft pick, D Danny Dekeyser, LW Anthony Mantha Detroit: D Alex Edler, C Jordan Schroeder Daniel Sedin-Henrik Sedin-Evander Kane Chris Higgins-Ryan Kesler-Mike Santorelli Zack Kassian-Brad Richardson-Jannik Hansen Tom Sestito-Zac Dalpe-Dale Weise Jeremy Welsh Dan Hamhuis-Kevin Bieksa Jason Garrison-Danny Dekeyser Ryan Stanton-Chris Tanev Yannik Weber Andrew Alberts Roberto Luongo Eddie Lack I like the first trade a lot. We would have to pay a kings ransom for Kane but it would be worth it. Second trade wouldn't happen. Dekeyeser is part of their core not. Doubt they would trade him unless you blew them away. Mantha also looks like he has star potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.