Brad Marchand Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Current Ranking: 1. Brock Boeser (104 votes - 53.97%) 2. Elias Pettersson (84 votes - 44.44%) 3. Olli Juolevi (95 votes - 54.29%) 4. Thatcher Demko (165 votes - 77.83%) 5. Jonathan Dahlen (77 votes - 41.62%) 6. Adam Gaudette (70 votes - 37.84%) 7. Nikolay Goldobin (90 votes - 55.21%) 8. Jake Virtanen (123 votes - 72.78%) 9. Kole Lind (68 votes - 40.48%) 10. Guillaume Brisebois (57 votes - 36.54%) 11. Jonah Gadjovich (tiebreaker: 29 votes - 59.18%) Eligible Prospects: Rodrigo AbolsMatthew BrassardCole CandellaMichael CarconeCole CasselsAnton CederholmJalen ChatfieldMichael DiPietroKristoffer GunnarssonPhilip HolmLukas JasekJoseph LaBateYan-Pavel LaplanteWilliam LockwoodZack MacEwenEvan McEnenyBrett McKenzieGriffen MolinoPetrus PalmuAndrey PedanJack RathboneAshton SautnerMackenzie StewartJakub StukelJordan SubbanDmitri Zhukenov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Come on PICK THE KEEPER!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnt Gravy Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 If the last one was a tiebreaker, wouldn't it be easier to just award it to Lockwood and move onto 13? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoast5347 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Lockwood is very underrated. I think he has the potential to be a very good middle six energy, heart and soul guy that we are missing. Excited to see all the depth in prospects! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Marchand Posted July 27, 2017 Author Share Posted July 27, 2017 9 minutes ago, Burnt Gravy said: If the last one was a tiebreaker, wouldn't it be easier to just award it to Lockwood and move onto 13? I'll move on to #13 tomorrow. Just wanted to make it official. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dank.sinatra Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 12 should be Lockwood after losing the tiebreaker with Gadjovich but whatever I'm sure he'll win this one, it's just kind of a waste of time. My vote for 13 will probably be Subban although Zhukenov is a personal favorite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Lockwood runs away with it. There was a time where he would have been one of our top 5 prospects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnt Gravy Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 2 minutes ago, Brad Marchand said: I'll move on to #13 tomorrow. Just wanted to make it official. I appreciate you doing this entire package though. Thanks a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beary Sweet Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 This one is a no brainer. Personally, I'd like McEneny for 13 since he's come a long way since being called up from the ECHL and broke out in a big way with Utica. He should be much higher in my opinion but having such a deep pool, he's being overshadowed. Next spot deserves to be his Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwags Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Lockwood. Finally... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreyHatnDart Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Should be unanimous.... and it is! Really like the looks of this guy. Hope he can build off a great season last year. To those complaining about the poll.. does it matter? It's July. We got nothing but time until hockey starts lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesB Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 1 hour ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: Lockwood runs away with it. There was a time where he would have been one of our top 5 prospects. Yes, and there was a time (not long ago) when a lot of people had Subban in the top 5. This time round he won't be in the top 12. 51 minutes ago, Beary Sweet said: This one is a no brainer. Personally, I'd like McEneny for 13 since he's come a long way since being called up from the ECHL and broke out in a big way with Utica. He should be much higher in my opinion but having such a deep pool, he's being overshadowed. Next spot deserves to be his The Canucks do have a deeper prospect pool than I can recall. Depending on how we define "prospect" there was time when Linden and Bure were both young guys in the system, and obviously when the Sedins were young guys they made the prospect pool good. And, more recently, there was a time when Edler, Kesler, Schneider, Hansen, and Raymond were all prospects. I have been critical of Benning but, after this year's additions of Pettersson, Lind, Dahlen, Goldobin, Gadjovich and DiPietro to the pool, the prospect pipeline is looking very good. And the Canucks still might get Alex Kerfoot after August 15. Obviously there is uncertainty about every guy on the list. But it plausible that the current prospect list could yield 4 to 6 "core" players (top 6 forwards, top 4 Ds, starting goalie). That would be excellent. We just need to hope that a couple of them turn out to be the kind of franchise players that can lead a Cup run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyoung Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Definitely Lockwood, he coulda slotted anywhere from 9-12. Very close with that group of guys. We got a few tiers of prospects for sure. Tier 1-boeser, Pettersson, Juolevi, demko Tier 2-dahlen, Gaudette, Goldobin, Virtanen Tier 3-Lind, Brisebois, Gadjovich, Lockwood Our tier 2-3 prospects arent too far off, which is awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 I feel Subban doesn't get a lot of respect as a prospect. Obviously his defense has been suspect but he's far and away our best offensive defensive prospect. It isn't even close. If he improves his defense a bit, he could be a star. I just don't see Will Lockwood ever being a star. So what do you value more, high ceiling or low floor? I'd take the high ceiling guy every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rocket Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Lockwood should've been a top 10 prospect. can't believe he's fallen this far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 1 hour ago, Burnt Gravy said: If the last one was a tiebreaker, wouldn't it be easier to just award it to Lockwood and move onto 13? You could only argue that if the total votes that went to the loser of the tiebreaker exceeds the remaining votes. For example, if the loser of the tiebreaker had 40 of the 100 votes, then in a subsequent poll, the loser of the tiebreaker could feasibly lose again, if the other 60 voters all choose in the right way. Even so, not all the same people vote in every poll nor do the same number of people vote. Point is, it's good to be sure and accurate with these things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 14 minutes ago, cyoung said: Definitely Lockwood, he coulda slotted anywhere from 9-12. Very close with that group of guys. We got a few tiers of prospects for sure. Tier 1-boeser, Pettersson, Juolevi, demko Tier 2-dahlen, Gaudette, Goldobin, Virtanen Tier 3-Lind, Brisebois, Gadjovich, Lockwood Our tier 2-3 prospects arent too far off, which is awesome. This is actually a pretty good way to look at it, though you could maybe argue that tier 3 is larger than just those players since it gets so close after the first eight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 William Lockwood... ...for the third time. Is third time the charm? Seems like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 41 minutes ago, cyoung said: Definitely Lockwood, he coulda slotted anywhere from 9-12. Very close with that group of guys. We got a few tiers of prospects for sure. Tier 1-boeser, Pettersson, Juolevi, demko Tier 2-dahlen, Gaudette, Goldobin, Virtanen Tier 3-Lind, Brisebois, Gadjovich, Lockwood Our tier 2-3 prospects arent too far off, which is awesome. I see it like this: Boeser Pettersson ---------------- Juolevi Demko Dahlen Gaudette ---------------- Goldobin Lind Lockwood Virtanen Gadjovich Brisebois Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyoung Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 33 minutes ago, -AJ- said: This is actually a pretty good way to look at it, though you could maybe argue that tier 3 is larger than just those players since it gets so close after the first eight. For sure, I personally believe there is a bit of a drop off after 12, mainly due to top end potential. It starts becoming very unlikely they make the league in my opinion. Like usual, I'd love to be proven wrong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.