• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
billabong

(Report) CBJ shopping Panarin

Recommended Posts

Dallas. 100% my bet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Are we going to want to take a run at him.  Tryamkin rights + 7th? (Ignore my outrageous price but they may ask that lol)

 

He is only 26.

Edited by Rush17
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Rush17 said:

Are we going to want to take a run at him.  Tryamkin rights + 7th? (Ignore my outrageous price but they may ask that lol)

 

He is only 26.

Dont see that as outrageous, but I think Columbus is in more of a win now mode and I dont see them trading their most impact-full player for a pick .

I dont think we have any pieces that would work in a trade for Panarin, they'd likely want Boeser.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man Panarin could be what we’re looking for if the price is reasonable. What do we have that Columbus would want?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A full year remaining - not sure why he'd extend this early.

 

 

That said, what a weak deal that was for Chicago.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Rush17 said:

Are we going to want to take a run at him.  Tryamkin rights + 7th? (Ignore my outrageous price but they may ask that lol)

 

He is only 26.

No thanks.  

  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldnews said:

A full year remaining - not sure why he'd extend this early.

 

 

That said, what a weak deal that was for Chicago.

No kidding,

 

image.thumb.png.f8a618ac20e335db4e4dc74b4a189cce.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Calgary is really looking at moving a D for a F: Dougie Hamilton for Panarin

 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tre Mac said:

Sutter + perhaps? 

I’m thinking they’d want a winger back to replace him. Maybe a package including Baertschi+Gaudette?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I would steer clear, only one year left. Unless Columbus wants more of veteran in return like Baer, Sutter, Tanev or Edler - all of which are completely unrealistic. 

No Point in giving up a Young asset for someone who's contract is up in the air after one Season.

Edited by cowen604

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can actually see Montreal in on him.

 

They also might want to try Dubois again too. Maybe talks even of swapping price for Bob?  I could see the team making a huge deal if they wanted too. Both teams have parts they both would probably want. Columbus may ditch Bob after his contract if he doesn't have playoff success. That is what one insider said he's been told. I always saw Price going to st Louis tho.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, cbdoubleu said:

If Calgary is really looking at moving a D for a F: Dougie Hamilton for Panarin

 

That would be big.  I personally wouldn't do that swap as the jackets. I think they can get a better D for him.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Parnarin is a great player, who even does better when the games get harder in the playoffs.  I don't think we should give up assets for him though.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, cbdoubleu said:

If Calgary is really looking at moving a D for a F: Dougie Hamilton for Panarin

 

Calgary would have to add though, and I doubt they want to give up any more future picks after the Hamonic deal. So likely a prospect as well. Then it becomes a question of who else they'd be willing to part with.

 

If I'm Columbus though, I'd be looking at trading him for a different forward that they can hopefully sign, not a defenseman. It's not that they want to get rid of Panarin, they want to be able to replace his scoring if he does walk. It would be more of a deal similar to the Galchenyuk/Domi or Subban/Weber ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only if we could get an extension, which i find doubtful. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If only Montreal knew :lol: Galchenyuk for Panarin might be a little more palatable for Habs fans than Domi.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hutton Wink said:

No, we are not "trading his rights".

I hope not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.