Kanukfanatic Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 11 minutes ago, Strombone said: If they're willing to take Eriksson as part of a package. I'd consider offering more. If not, then this is the most I'd offer: Granlund Hutton 3rd round pick 2020 (turns into a 2nd if Canucks make the playoffs) for Zucker But Zucker has been trending down. It really looks like a cap dump for Minnesota. The Wild must be eyeing some of the big name FAs. I understand being a major Canuck fan. But saying Zucker is a camp dump is stupid. He has had 3 good years and knowledgeable hockey scouts think highly of him. Come on... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Jester13 said: Boeser is not going anywhere, especially for someone like Zucker. Yeesh. No one said that. No one. Edit: the rumor was Boeser for Zucker and the 12th overall. Accuracy matters. Edited June 6, 2019 by Kanukfanatic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10pavelbure96 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Boeser should be untouchable. This is a joke 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Considering that Benning is on record saying that he's not going to be trading one of our core guys, this talk of Boeser in any sort of deal is irrelevant. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 (edited) 17 hours ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: So trade Boeser for Zucker and 12th overall? Cool. So once Zucker is over the hill in 3 years or so, hopefully the guy we pick at 12th overall will have been developed into a player as good as Boeser. Perfect. So...….just dreaming a bit...……….. Boeser is just an asset...………..he will sign for about 7 M....hold on to that thought for a minute...………. So Boeser for Zucker + 2019 1st (12 OA) + 2020 2nd...……. Flip Zucker to Edmonton for their 2019 1st (8th OA)...……..maybe we retain some???? Sign Panarin and Duchene = 20 M (so we are expedientially better) Walk into the 2019 NHL draft with. 2019 1st 8th OA...…...Dach/Zegras/Boldy 2019 1st 10th OA...….Soderstrom/Seider 2019 1st 12th OA...….Krebs/Newhook/Lavoie That to me, we are way better off Edited June 6, 2019 by janisahockeynut 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 If they want Boeser: to MIN Boesser Hutton 2020 2nd dipietro to VAN Zucker dumba 12th OA 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Generational.EP40 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 5 hours ago, 18W-40C-6W said: 5 hours ago, thejazz97 said: Really? Virtanen, the likely 3W? Gaudette, who tops out at 3C or maybe low-end 2C? We're too emotionally attached to dime-a-dozen players. I don't think Benning will trade Virtanen. Gaudette, I don't think he will either. But if it comes to acquiring Zucker? I'd send one for sure. Fenton is probably the worst GM in the league, and I don't think he's bending anyone over. Rask for Niederreiter (w no homework done on Rask) Granlund for Fiala which are terrible deals, and Coyle for Donato, which was an even deal. If Minnesota wins this deal, I'd be heavily surprised. 4 hours ago, Down by the River said: Imagine spending this much of your life going through threads to make multiple posts to $&!# on a GM about things that aren't actually going to happen. EDIT: Also, the thread title is misleading since nowhere in the tweet was there an indication that the Canucks were all in. 4 hours ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: Actually, Zucker and Myers are both intriguing and would help out team pretty significantly. What matters is the price. AV overreacted a bit but there’s legitimate reason for concern. Remember, JB has never won a trade outright in his tenure with the Canucks. The fact there’s other teams involved and reports the Canucks are going after Zucker hard doesn’t give me confidence if I’m being honest. I don’t get how so many people can give JB the benefit of the doubt so blindly. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with anyone siding with caution here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 8 minutes ago, Provost said: Yep, Zucker+Dumba for Boeser+Virtanen is the deal to be made from our side... if it is a no go from them (which it probably is), then move on. Dumba is a 1st pairing D and worth more than Boeser. Zucker is worth quite a bit more than Virtanen. I would add a 2nd on top of it. Dumba > Boeser (only because a 1st pairing D is worth more than a 1st line winger - every time) Zucker > Virtanen (but Virt is younger and has size - and I really like Jake) Canucks add a 2nd or another prospect. Dumba Zucker for Boeser Virtanen 2nd (or Gaudette) - still not sure that would get it done I would do that for a 1st pairing D. We would get most of Boeser's production for the first few years and a very good D for many years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 1 minute ago, 10pavelbure96 said: Boeser should be untouchable. This is a joke God, when are you guys going to grow up? Wayne Gretzky was traded...…..wrap your head around that for a minute...……... 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Jason Zucker just seems like a sell high type of guy at the moment. Maybe trying to sell you on the 2018 60+ point player when really probably hovers as a 20+ goal guy and 45ish points a season. I love his game but as a rebuilding team I don’t want to pay futures for a good 2nd liner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 5 hours ago, KKnight said: You have to think Minny is asking for Gaudette. I would be comfortable with Sven,Hutton and an additional prospect. I know thats not enough, Zucker strikes me more as a really effective two way forward, with great speed and defensive instincts, great off the rush. I dont think i would be comfortable with either of Virtanen or Gaudette going the other way though. So spare parts? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 3 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: Considering that Benning is on record saying that he's not going to be trading one of our core guys, this talk of Boeser in any sort of deal is irrelevant. Fair enough and I agree. Just spit balling. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Just now, Canucks Curse said: If they want Boeser: to MIN Boesser Hutton 2020 2nd dipietro to VAN Zucker dumba 12th OA Then imagine what you could do with the 10th and 12th? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10pavelbure96 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Just now, janisahockeynut said: God, when are you guys going to grow up? Wayne Gretzky was traded...…..wrap your head around that for a minute...……... The Oilers were a dynasty and still won a cup afterwards. We are a rebuilding team. Apples and oranges. Brock Boesers dont grow on trees. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 5 hours ago, Alain Vigneault said: Fenton to bend Benning over because he knows Jim is desperate to make playoffs to save his job? I think yes. Wouldn't be surprised if we threw in #10 to land him. Benning is not Swedish for bent over. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 9 minutes ago, 10pavelbure96 said: Boeser should be untouchable. This is a joke How is that possible? He's never scored 30 goals. I love him but get real. Everyone has a price. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 8 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said: So...….just dreaming bit...……….. Boeser is just an asset...………..he will sign for about 7 M....hold on to that thought for a minute...………. So Boeser for Zucker + 2019 1st (12 OA) + 2020 2nd...……. Flip Zucker to Edmonton for their 2019 1st (8th OA)...……..maybe we retain some???? Sign Panarin and Duchene = 20 M (so we are expedientially better) Walk into the 2019 NHL draft with. 2019 1st 8th OA...…...Dach/Zegras/Boldy 2019 1st 10th OA...….Soderstrom/Seider 2019 1st 12th OA...….Krebs/Newhook/Lavoie That to me, we are way better off No way Zucker is worth 8th overall. Not even close. We can sign Panarin anyways. No thanks to Duchene. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Just now, Chris12345 said: How is that possible? He's never scored 30 goals. I love him but get real. Everyone has a price. Again, Benning is on record saying it won't happen, so no, Boeser doesn't have a price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 6 minutes ago, 10pavelbure96 said: The Oilers were a dynasty and still won a cup afterwards. We are a rebuilding team. Apples and oranges. Brock Boesers dont grow on trees. Shea Webber traded PK Subban traded Brett Hull traded Phil Esposito traded Brad Park Traded Tavares not resigned Kessel traded and so on and so on...………………. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: No way Zucker is worth 8th overall. Not even close. We can sign Panarin anyways. No thanks to Duchene. Can we sign Panarin? Banking on free agents is fools gold. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now