canuckster19 Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 Just make it so that if a post game review shows the player left the bench early will result in an automatic one game suspension. Boom, done. No more Healy or MacGuire down their either, that would be a complete win win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surtur Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I like the idea, put a few obstacles in the way as well, really make it exciting. wipeout style...? but i do think the only time you should get to sit and rest/relax should be after a fight. not for high sticking someone in the face or tripping someone you should have to stand at the other end of the ice from your zone by the opposition goalie in a box. after your penalty is up, your team is considered offside if at anytime you are ahead of an offensive rush over your teams blue line. so basically you and your team would have to all tag up if the penalty ends in the PP teams zone. but if you don't tag up it is not just iceing it is a penalty... Lets do it NHL. or we just keep things how they have been for the last you know couple years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester13 Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I lol'd at this big time! "What's the deal with the penalty box?" :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Industrious1 Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I'm sure the officials could keep track of who was supposed to be on the bench for how long.................couldn't they? Anyways, call me a traditionalist but I like the idea of the penalty box. For me, it stays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie13 Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 Just make it so that if a post game review shows the player left the bench early will result in an automatic one game suspension. Boom, done. No more Healy or MacGuire down their either, that would be a complete win win. Isn't it already an automatic 10 game suspension? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absent Canuck Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I am thinking what Sutter is really saying is that its figure staking now. Having penalty boxes insults the old timers who used to play when it was a real gong show out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xbox Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I think he's out to lunch on this one. Imagine the refs having to keep track of whether a guy stayed on the bench long enough. Would there be officials on the team bench making sure the penalized player stays there? The penalty boxes are fine they way they are. Sutter made a great argument, then you successfully refuted it with good points. +1 good sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson-JH Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 Wow, California sure is rubbing on him quickly... I just counted three overused words, "likes" in his quotes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hudson bay rules Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I kinda like the fact that the player penalized is the one who is forced to jump into the play rather than who the coaches choose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMBUTANS Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 Why not keep it and just sell a few spots inside the penalty box? Wouldn't it be fun to be in there with the players specially during line brawls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sypher009 Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 Why not keep it and just sell a few spots inside the penalty box? Wouldn't it be fun to be in there with the players specially during line brawls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I think he's out to lunch on this one. ... I think Sutter's just generally out to lunch - I mean, he can apparently coach, but he gets weird. Sutter starts interviewing himself after questions about Scrivens “‘So, Darryl, how do you think Martin Jones played today?’” he asked himself before going on to answer his own question. “‘I thought he was really solid. Made some big saves for us. Jeez. Really held us in there in the first period. I thought he was outstanding.’” Darryl Sutter said some stuff about the Western Conference being hard “We play 26 or 29 division games. You can’t come up with the real numbers. Whoever wins tonight, fine. Somebody is going to win. Somebody is going to get two, somebody might get one, and somebody might get none. That’s the way it is. It’s either three-and-two, two-and-[three], or two-and-two. Right? That’s what the division is, and it’s not balanced it because of 16-14. You can’t come up with numbers. I mean, I know now the big thing is – I’ve said it before. They should just come to me first, right? Because I said, ‘You know what? It’s going to take at least 100 points to make the playoffs.’ So now, everybody’s like ‘Oh, there’s going to be eight teams…’ I said that. Heck, that’s how good the teams are.” Video: Darryl Sutter entertains during press conference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VMR Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I think he's out to lunch on this one. Imagine the refs having to keep track of whether a guy stayed on the bench long enough. Would there be officials on the team bench making sure the penalized player stays there? The penalty boxes are fine they way they are. Agreed. The ref's have a hard enough time making the right calls and he wants them to keep track of people on the bench? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 Great idea. Why, I bet Florida and Carolina could get 15 bucks each for those seats... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YEGCanuck Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 Com'on man, figure staking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avelanch Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 put them in the small box inbetween the benches where mcguire stands, and have him try to keep them separate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avelanch Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I think Sutter's just generally out to lunch - I mean, he can apparently coach, but he gets weird. . Sounds like steiner math to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donky Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I have a better idea. Lets put guys in a cage that retracts up above ice level. When the penalty ends the cage descends down and lets the player out onto the ice. You're Welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpt.Clutch Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I think he's out to lunch on this one. Imagine the refs having to keep track of whether a guy stayed on the bench long enough. Would there be officials on the team bench making sure the penalized player stays there? The penalty boxes are fine they way they are. Only way I see this working is if a player gets a penalty, he sits in the dressing room for the remainder of the period, while the team is shorthanded for only 2/4/5 mins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 Sounds like steiner math to me He's had some very stange rambling answers at times. Can't find the other one I was thinking of, but it was similar and must have made sense in his head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.