Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Speculation] Sportsnet's Hockey Cenral: Should the Canucks consider moving Bo Horvat


Southpop45

Recommended Posts

Trade pieces moving forward due to age, NTC cap friendliness or redundancy

Hansen

Higgins

Weise

Edler

Tanev

Stanton

Luongo

Lack

Burrows

Booth

:picard:

Also seing as we picked up stanton on waivers earlier this season i believe that we have to offer him up for free to any other team who put a claim in as well before we could actually trade him. :sadno:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

other teams arent afraid of moving young top end talent to help them win a cup. LA traded. b, schenn and simmonds just to acquire mike richards. That along with get Carter did what for the kings???

Oh ya they went on to win a stanley cup. So it can pay off to trade a young high valued prospect for immediate help.

Look at the players age and the difference between the Canucks now and the Kings now. 1 young star is not going to help the canucks.

We do not have a top D like Doughty (hate that guy) do not have a Carter Richards Quick, Brown (hate him more)

The Kings were and are bigger and younger and as skilled or more than us in all areas right now. 1 player and a loss of Horvat won't change that. Same example can be used with the hawks Ducks Blues and more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the players age and the difference between the Canucks now and the Kings now. 1 young star is not going to help the canucks.

We do not have a top D like Doughty (hate that guy) do not have a Carter Richards Quick, Brown (hate him more)

The Kings were and are bigger and younger and as skilled or more than us in all areas right now. 1 player and a loss of Horvat won't change that. Same example can be used with the hawks Ducks Blues and more.

Luo has played very good for us this year. And you dont think if we acquired 2 top 6 players would significantly improve our team, and that being said the players we would get say: E.kane, Wheeler,Oreilly,stastny who all have lots of good hockey in them..

Sedin sedin kane/wheeler

burrows kesler wheeler/o'reilly/stastny

higgins schroeder/richardson kassian

sestito richardson/dalpe weise/Booth

hamhuis tanev

garrison bieksa

stanton weber/ other d via trade or corrado

luongo

That team doesnt impress you and give you 2 legit scoring lines? with solid d and goaltending. And we trade edler,hansen and horvat. One of which we have too many of LHD and a prospect whos atleast 2-3 yrs away from being somewhat of a major contributor game breaker.

Its a bold move to potentially do. But after making it to game 7 of the cup final and then watch 3 years go by and not see us make any upgrades as we watch our core age, i think the time has come where you have to consider going with a big bold move, or you give in to not being good enough, move the older guys with ntc, should have never resigned the twins and dealt away players for prospects and picks.

But since that isnt what MG is doing, he should be aggressively trying to improve now. why wait till july where you can hope to buyout booth, and maybe get a top 6 winger who will most likely get overpaid.

Personally im tired of seeing us struggle to score. and if trading schneider leads us to mooving horvat inevitabely for say E.Kane Im sure ppl wont be upset. As if we could have made a schneider for Kane trade straight up almost all fans would be happy with that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only untouchable prospect is Hodgson...

Corey Schneider will never be traded...

Trade Grabner for anything because Raymond is better defensively, we have enough scorers...

Rochester Institute of Technology, what?...

etc...

- said some people, not too long ago

Things change. You never know.

...aaaand look at the state of the franchise because of it. In freefall because it can't score goals. A sniper and a playmaker would definitely help the Powerplay....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheveldayoff: Hey, Kipper, I'm in talks with Gillis for a trade but he won't give up Horvat. Can you mention it on your program?

Kipper: Of course! Hey, did you know I used to play hockey?

Cheveldayoff: Mention Ladd's name for Horvat so that Gillis can say no to it but then yes to Kane. Thanks, pal.

Kipper: I used to play hockey.

LOL! Its funny kypreos thinks he was a hockey player. Isn't that funny. He thinks he played hockey. Hey kipper, you didn't play, you weren't a hockey player, you were just a guy on skates, with a jersey on, who got to skate once in a while. You never made hockey plays, or scored goals. But its funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...aaaand look at the state of the franchise because of it. In freefall because it can't score goals. A sniper and a playmaker would definitely help the Powerplay....

Over dramatic much? Not sure what you mean by "freefall", but either your expectations are too high or your opinion of the team in the past is too high. No team in sports wins every game. That, by definition wouldn't be a sport. Canucks + Vigneault made it past the 2nd round once.

....A seeing eye dog would help the PP right now. Need to break the slump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over dramatic much? Not sure what you mean by "freefall", but either your expectations are too high or your opinion of the team in the past is too high. No team in sports wins every game. That, by definition wouldn't be a sport. Canucks + Vigneault made it past the 2nd round once.

....A seeing eye dog would help the PP right now. Need to break the slump.

Looks to me this team has scored the least goals in January so far. We as fans have seen what kind of team it takes to make it to the cup. Lots of depth and the right players. The 2 players you mentioned earlier would help us. Just glad Kassian is starting to show his potential to be a force.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you nuts??? 50 year old Ray Whitney? injury prone Hemsky? the enigmatic Heatley? Andrew "scrubb"Ladd? NO JUST NOOOO!!!

Horvat will become a great player and giving him up will be stupid.

Ok if you don't want those offensive weapons maybe trade Horvat for Ribeiro, Penner or Malkin. We need to do something to increase the goal scoring. It's at it's lowest point in years right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Kypreos would love to se sexy Horvat in the shower.

That being said....Im sure if Horvat was on any other team besides Canucks...his value and marketing would be alot higher that it is. Kypreos would be singing a different tune like....Ladd+ extras for Horvat

That also being said...Ladd at 28 would be welcomed on this team anyday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luo has played very good for us this year. And you dont think if we acquired 2 top 6 players would significantly improve our team, and that being said the players we would get say: E.kane, Wheeler,Oreilly,stastny who all have lots of good hockey in them..

Sedin sedin kane/wheeler

burrows kesler wheeler/o'reilly/stastny

higgins schroeder/richardson kassian

sestito richardson/dalpe weise/Booth

hamhuis tanev

garrison bieksa

stanton weber/ other d via trade or corrado

luongo

That team doesnt impress you and give you 2 legit scoring lines? with solid d and goaltending. And we trade edler,hansen and horvat. One of which we have too many of LHD and a prospect whos atleast 2-3 yrs away from being somewhat of a major contributor game breaker.

Its a bold move to potentially do. But after making it to game 7 of the cup final and then watch 3 years go by and not see us make any upgrades as we watch our core age, i think the time has come where you have to consider going with a big bold move, or you give in to not being good enough, move the older guys with ntc, should have never resigned the twins and dealt away players for prospects and picks.

But since that isnt what MG is doing, he should be aggressively trying to improve now. why wait till july where you can hope to buyout booth, and maybe get a top 6 winger who will most likely get overpaid.

Personally im tired of seeing us struggle to score. and if trading schneider leads us to mooving horvat inevitabely for say E.Kane Im sure ppl wont be upset. As if we could have made a schneider for Kane trade straight up almost all fans would be happy with that

I won't argue with any of those points and yes IF we could trade for and retain two solid young top 6 players like Kane Wheeler etc we'd be a totally different team. Still need a puck moving D man and a top 6 playmaking center if Schroeder doesn't work out for us, but yes we'd be a threat again.

But in this climate, with Buffalo and Anaheim setting the price as high as they did for Vanek and Ryan....I am hesitant to pay anyones rental price for the minimal depth we have if it isn't for a player as young skilled and under a contract as nice as E. Kanes. And sadly, nobody is giving anyone like him up anytime soon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...