Piggy Bank Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Goalies not named Ryan Miller: Eddie Lack, Joacim Eriksson, Jacob Markstrom, Joe Cannata, Thatcher Demko Whose currently the best: Eddie Lack Who needs to improve the most: Joe Cannata Who has been thought to have the most potential: Jacob Markstrom Who does this organization seek to have as our number 1: Eddie Lack Young wingers ready to make impact in 2-4 years: Shinkaruk, Kassian, Virtanen, Jensen, Zalew, Gren Players who will probably have to move to wing: Gaunce, Cassels, Fox ^ Because of our hopefuls for being a center: Horvat, Vey, McCann Notorious prospects and players we don't need dude to redundancy: G: Eriksson, Markstrom, Cannata F: Gaunce, Kassian, Grenier, Fox Packages we could offer: Gaunce, 2nd/Markstrom for Calgary's 2015 first Eriksson, Kassian, 2nd for Evander Kane Markstrom, 3rd for Torey Krug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Packages that will be declined: Gaunce, 2nd/Markstrom for Calgary's 2015 first Eriksson, Kassian, 2nd for Evander Kane Markstrom, 3rd for Torey Krug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComfyMatter Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 BOS and WIN laughs, then hangs up. IDK bout Calgary.. may work.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etsen3 Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 I'm not down to trade our prospect death. Chances are several of those players aren't gonna pan out. There's no such thing as a redundant prospect for us right now, since we don't know who might make an impact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slappipappi Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Calgary would turn down a bunch a junk for a certain lottery pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Packages that will be declined: Gaunce, 2nd/Markstrom for Calgary's 2015 first Eriksson, Kassian, 2nd for Evander Kane Markstrom, 3rd for Torey Krug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckFanForever1123 Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 That time you called Kassian redundant... Please enlighten me on all the large power forwards we are stacked with in our system, that could potentially score 25-30 goals a season with some more work... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNeil Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 All 3 teams laugh and hang up, and think less of Benning as a man from now on.As Etsen pointed out. Teams will have several prospects that will never pan out.The Calgary trade....good lord this could be a top 3 pick, and very likely a top 5.They know it....they aren't giving that away for a 3rd string goalie and a 26th pick from 2 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrChill Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Notorious prospects and players we don't need dude to redundancy: G: Eriksson, Markstrom, Cannata F: Gaunce, Kassian, Grenier, Fox Why is Kassian redundant? You know not every prospect will work out right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollumpus Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Why is Kassian redundant? You know not every prospect will work out right? I'm also trying to figure that out... regards, G. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombieksa Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 The only NHL team without a backup is NJ. Markstrom +4th for a 2nd and let it go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 That time you called Kassian redundant... Please enlighten me on all the large power forwards we are stacked with in our system, that could potentially score 25-30 goals a season with some more work... Especially one that is Right Handed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComfyMatter Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Calgary would turn down a bunch a junk for a certain lottery pick. Yeah, Gaunce, 2nd Round pick, and Markstrom are piece of "junk". Not saying this is enough to get a 1st round pick but what we are giving up ain't junk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Yeah, Gaunce, 2nd Round pick, and Markstrom are piece of "junk". Not saying this is enough to get a 1st round pick but what we are giving up ain't junk. This. First round pick player. Best goalie not in the nhl as crowned not long ago and ahl player of the month a few times plus a 2nd round pick. Sure all crap.... The cdc continues to hype up possibilities and potential everywhere else, but everything we have is junk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugor Hill Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 The moment you pick up the phone you are dealing from a position of weakness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sestito Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Markstrom sucks. Let's call a spade a spade. He's never showed any signs at the NHL level. Also, these pieces suck when you're talking about most likely a top three pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex425 Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 All 3 teams laugh and never pick up the phone call from Benning again. That's how bad it would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
420since1974 Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 You'd have to offer an elite player to pry that pick from Calgary. That won't happen so they'll keep the pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNeil Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Yeah, Gaunce, 2nd Round pick, and Markstrom are piece of "junk". Not saying this is enough to get a 1st round pick but what we are giving up ain't junk.The way the OP has a / between 2nd and Markstrom, but doesn't have a / in the Winnipeg trade.He meant or?But even with all 3, its still very one sided. Calgary's number one pick next year is pretty much their best asset. They can get more for that pick, then trading any roster player for sure.Maybe Bennett could fetch more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 No team is going to trade away their first pick in next years draft without getting a very good player back. So much hype about next years draft and it could possibly be - well - just hype. But as a result there is no way any team is giving up their pick for anybody on this team unless their names were: Hamhuis (top ten pick) Bieksa (top twenty pick) Miller (top twenty pick and only to a team that has no number one like we did after Luongo was traded) Sedins (top ten pick) Vrbata (top twenty pick) Edler? Maybe a team would take a flyer on him THAT IS IT!!! No combination of any other players on this team is going to cut it. If those names aren't included it simply is not going to happen. A more appropriate name for this topic (and a lot of others in this part of the forum) should be "dealing from a position of dreaming" which is fine - and yes occasionally one sided deals are made (ahem Gillis) in this league but don't see it happening with these draft picks in the 1st round next year. Check out Phanuef/Kesler/Getzlaf/Perry/Suter/Parise/M.Richard/Carter/ and much more draft years and see what a bumper crop of folks and superstars that came in that year - if this draft is like that then the entire first round will be the next face of the NHL in five years, and the media is pumping it to be such a year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.