SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 10 minutes ago, Squamfan said: what, he saying to people play for the canucks. i need proof He definitely tried to convince Caggiula: The third member of college hockey’s CBS line, Drake Caggiula, just returned to Grand Forks after a tour of potential National Hockey League employers that included a visit with the Canucks last Thursday and Friday. “He just got back here at school,” Boeser said between golf shots. “He hasn’t said too much about it, but I’m trying to get it out of him and convince him to come to Van. He said it was a great trip and he really got along with the staff and stuff.” - See more at: http://www.vancourier.com/pass-it-to-bulis/brock-boeser-is-the-canucks-inside-man-at-und-1.2247530#sthash.x9xOOxjV.dpuf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 5 hours ago, Freeridebc said: Last night on 1040 some guy saying rumor was Brock doesn't want to play in Canada, anyone heard anything about this? its bs, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 1 hour ago, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said: He definitely tried to convince Caggiula: Is Caggiula getting minutes with the Coil? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Is Caggiula getting minutes with the Coil? Hasn't played one regular season game for them. But he's been injured and is in the AHL right now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 8 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Hasn't played one regular season game for them. But he's been injured and is in the AHL right now. If he signed with us he'd be in our top nine for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clutesi Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 5 hours ago, Alflives said: Tanev + Boeser for Kane and Reinhart? would we do that? It's painful to think of, but is it fair? Why even think of trading our best young d-man and best prospect when we're trying to develop? He's our draft and we'll sign him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 3 minutes ago, clutesi said: Why even think of trading our best young d-man and best prospect when we're trying to develop? He's our draft and we'll sign him. Yes, it's very painful to think of, but JB wants to speed up the rebuild, and this trade brings in two forwards who are developed, while still being relatively young. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 31 minutes ago, Alflives said: Yes, it's very painful to think of, but JB wants to speed up the rebuild, and this trade brings in two forwards who are developed, while still being relatively young. How would our roster look with those players... Where would they fit? Sedin Sedin Eriksson Kane Reinhart Hansen Granlund Sutter Burrows Baerstschi Horvat Dorsett That screws our development by putting Bo and Sven on the fourth line, Or It means we gave up a ton for a foundational player in sutter to play the fourth line and it mean a bunch of other players are left off the roster. (Virtanen, Gaunce, Skille, Rodin) We have a future need for some of those players but until the Sedins leave, we don't have room to be adding. It makes more sense for us to make a move like that in 2 years or for us to draft a player to be ready in two years to take over for the twins.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 15 minutes ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: How would our roster look with those players... Where would they fit? Sedin Sedin Eriksson Kane Reinhart Hansen Granlund Sutter Burrows Baerstschi Horvat Dorsett That screws our development by putting Bo and Sven on the fourth line, Or It means we gave up a ton for a foundational player in sutter to play the fourth line and it mean a bunch of other players are left off the roster. (Virtanen, Gaunce, Skille, Rodin) We have a future need for some of those players but until the Sedins leave, we don't have room to be adding. It makes more sense for us to make a move like that in 2 years or for us to draft a player to be ready in two years to take over for the twins.. Or we could go Sedin - Sedin - Sutter Kane - Reinhart - Eriksson Baertschi - Horvat - Hansen Granlund - Gaunce - Burrows/Dorsett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 4 minutes ago, Pears said: Or we could go Sedin - Sedin - Sutter Kane - Reinhart - Eriksson Baertschi - Horvat - Hansen Granlund - Gaunce - Burrows/Dorsett Since sutter would be on the top line that would limit Horvat into full defensive zone duties and personally I want to see the kid grow more offensively. Canucks currently have too many centers, if were going to get a future Hank replacement, lets do it after Hank is gone or then at least explore possibilities of moving them. Getting a player before they are gone just puts everything on pause for a couple years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 2 minutes ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: Since sutter would be on the top line that would limit Horvat into full defensive zone duties and personally I want to see the kid grow more offensively. Canucks currently have too many centers, if were going to get a future Hank replacement, lets do it after Hank is gone or then at least explore possibilities of moving them. Getting a player before they are gone just puts everything on pause for a couple years. Would the trade (as silly as it is) make us better up front, right now? The key in the entire deal (for me) is getting Sam Reinhart. I see him as a replacement for Henrik, and in time being an excellent one two punch at center with Bo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clutesi Posted November 16, 2016 Share Posted November 16, 2016 40 minutes ago, Alflives said: Would the trade (as silly as it is) make us better up front, right now? The key in the entire deal (for me) is getting Sam Reinhart. I see him as a replacement for Henrik, and in time being an excellent one two punch at center with Bo. I can see what you mean, but hasn't Kane been a cancer for every team he's played for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 53 minutes ago, clutesi said: I can see what you mean, but hasn't Kane been a cancer for every team he's played for? Yes, but is Sam Reinhart worth the pain of the trade for one, and the taking in Kane for two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
messier's_elbow Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 14 hours ago, Freeridebc said: Last night on 1040 some guy saying rumor was Brock doesn't want to play in Canada, anyone heard anything about this? He's signing after this season. Trying to start drama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 10 hours ago, canuckledraggin said: Great source. Some guy has never been wrong before so this must be true. Trump built his campaign on "things he heard" and he won the election for President of the United States so....crap, Boeser must be leaving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jam126 Posted November 17, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted November 17, 2016 14 hours ago, Freeridebc said: Last night on 1040 some guy saying rumor was Brock doesn't want to play in Canada, anyone heard anything about this? I always turn to "some guy" as my reliable source for news. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrreindeer Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 2 hours ago, messier's_elbow said: He's signing after this season. Trying to start drama. Nothing is signed yet. Other college players have declined to sign with the team that drafted them so don't count your chickens yet. This could all go (further) downhill in a hurry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 No it will not go downhill if Boeser does not want to play here which he said he sure does, then he will be traded and we will get back a decent package for him.Boeser has said after this season he is excited to come play for us so this guy who ever he is must be drunk or on glue or something! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHockeyNerds Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 (edited) Let's not start this "Brock isn't going to sign with Vancouver" again. Edited November 17, 2016 by TheHockeyNerds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted November 17, 2016 Share Posted November 17, 2016 25 minutes ago, mrreindeer said: Nothing is signed yet. Other college players have declined to sign with the team that drafted them so don't count your chickens yet. This could all go (further) downhill in a hurry. Do a little research before trying to troll https://www.nhl.com/news/brock-boeser-canucks-prospect-aims-to-improve-game/c-281175164 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now