Guest Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 17 minutes ago, chilliwiggins said: I agree the team wants change. Hammer is still caged so really we are speculating , and maybe his jaw is quite fragile, not really suited for the playoff run but good enough to play. I'm just speculating of course but those kinds of things have me worried that we aren't going to get much at the deadline if anything, looking at the list of players we were initially looking to turn over at the deadline which have now become of little or no value. it looks scary to me , to tell you the truth. The trigger should have been pulled when doubts first started creeping in about some of the players. that's just me I think Hamhuis is tradeable. If he wasn't suited for a playoff run then he would be ineffective if Canucks made the playoffs. Plus I think he plays better WITH the cage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Just now, Ryan Strome said: See my last post. Doesn't change the fact they have top end prospect talent. Doesn't change the fact that your post was completely and utterly incorrect. By a wide margin. Finishing last overall guarantees you nothing but a 4th overall pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 1 minute ago, wallstreetamigo said: Anything that gives me more hope that the Leags do not get Matthews is a good thing haha What if it's among Toronto, Edmonton, and Calgary? Throw Montreal in there, too. Plenty of "please no's" to go around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Just now, Ryan Strome said: The Minister trumps all others.. No, the immutable odds of probability do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canorth Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 1 minute ago, wallstreetamigo said: Saying "real" instead of "really" is not using a lay term though. It doesn't show the authenticity of anything other than hockey people are largely uneducated. I mean, saying "really good" rather than "real good" is such a stretch that a fan like you would not understand if they used proper English? Doesnt it it make you feel stupid if your argument is the reason they do that? I mean, you are basically saying they don't think you are smart enough to understand such a fancy word as really instead of real. Doesn't Willie have a Masters Degree in Sociology? The difference between "real" and "really" is personal preference as to ease and comfort of communication. It can be a learned mannerism or just the way he prefers to say things. Everybody has them and it has absolutely no reflection on intelligence. It is, however, extremely petty to point this out as an attempt to call him out as being stupid. It childish. If you so easily feel that your intelligence is being insulted, that's not Willie problem... it yours...In fact, the next time you feel so insulted, try sitting with that thought take, deep breath, and ask yourself "is this mustached man on THE TV trying to hurt my feelings? Or am just being an pompous ass?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRussianRocket. Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Lmao. Idk how in the world Polak is worth 2 2nd round picks. He's not even a 1/3 the player Hamhuis is. Put into perspective, Hamhuis should easily be worth a 1st+ using it as a comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 2 minutes ago, theminister said: No, they don't. Only someone who is functionally illiterate in math would think that. Wow you're a pretty rude to him. Was he this rude to you when you didn't know which team Christian Ehrhoff played for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Just now, Ryan Strome said: Wow you're a pretty rude to him. Was he this rude to you when you didn't know which team Christian Ehrhoff played for? You think that is rudeness? Pretty thin skin there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 5 minutes ago, Hutton Wink said: What if it's among Toronto, Edmonton, and Calgary? Throw Montreal in there, too. Plenty of "please no's" to go around. What a joke if it's Edmonton they could then trade RNH and Draisaitl for dmen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 3 minutes ago, theminister said: You think that is rudeness? Pretty thin skin there. I have been accused of thin skin often actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzy Desjardins Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 I'm confused. Torres traded to tor but re-assigned to 'cudas. .... Wouldn't he go to the Marlies? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Just now, Frazzy Desjardins said: I'm confused. Torres traded to tor but re-assigned to 'cudas. .... Wouldn't he go to the Marlies? ? The Marlies? They're better then the leafs they don't need him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Monahan Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 1 hour ago, wallstreetamigo said: What's the over/under on anyone believing Benning if he says, "Well, we just couldn't get anything done. Trade talks around the league have been real quiet." On another pet peeve note, in the next CBA can the NHL and NHLPA please negotiate in a mandatory educational service for all management, coaches, and players to be taught that "real good" is not proper English? These guys are managing and/or making billions of dollars, can they at least try to fake that they are smarter than people who don't? I believe he has a Master's degree though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 3 hours ago, nux4lyfe said: Somehow We are going to end up getting a 3rd for Hammy Don't forget that salary retention... and a 2nd thrown in! Gotta get these right 3 hours ago, LaBamba said: After last night it's safe to say Hamuis ain't going anywhere. Shh, not so loud! Trader Jim might hear you and agree with that! Seriously, if Polak gets that much (Hammer is at LEAST the same level as him) Community Dan deserves a late first from a contender and a prospect. The fact that he's ranked as the best rental D-man available should only help his value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 13 minutes ago, Frazzy Desjardins said: I'm confused. Torres traded to tor but re-assigned to 'cudas. .... Wouldn't he go to the Marlies? ? They did this with the Ottawa trade too. If those players cap hits over the 950k or whatever is able to be buried are not counting towards their NHL cap then it is likely to circumvent those cap rules. If they do count it is just because they don't want or need those players in the Marlies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 If Hammer doesn't want to move because of his family isn't this a moo point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 That current Leafs lineup though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzy Desjardins Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 8 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: They did this with the Ottawa trade too. If those players cap hits over the 950k or whatever is able to be buried are not counting towards their NHL cap then it is likely to circumvent those cap rules. If they do count it is just because they don't want or need those players in the Marlies. So then he continues playing for sj's farm team, as leafs property...weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Just now, Blue Jay 22 said: That current Leafs lineup though Obvious tank is obvious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 Just now, Frazzy Desjardins said: So then he continues playing for sj's farm team, as leafs property...weird. It is not often utilized to loan a player back to the other AHL team but it does happen occasionally. I would be interested to see if their cap hits are counting for Toronto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.