smokes Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 If the Canucks had to lose one to get a young scoring winger. Who do you think the Canucks should keep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Tryamkin crushes his opponents. I like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sygvard Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Groot is super fun to watch, but I am in favour of mobile puck moving D. I think Hutton has the higher ceiling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Type R Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 I voted Tryamkin, but if it was my club, it would be neither. Hutton, Guddy, Tryamkin and Stetcher are untouchable. Edler or Tanev is debatable for me, my preference would be Edler (mind you this is the best he's looked in awhile), leaving Sbisa & Larsen (Sbisa also looking the best he has this year). Due to age alone, Edler is the logical trade piece, and teams like Detroit and Buffalo would love a steady guy like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Huttons good, Tryamkins unique. If he keeps crushing guys, they are just going to start jumping out of the way and making bad passes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 3 minutes ago, Sygvard said: Groot is super fun to watch, but I am in favour of mobile puck moving D. I think Hutton has the higher ceiling. We are Groot. Tryamkin can provide fear, particularly for teams coming into our rink. If he can get guys more worried about getting hit than making good plays thats a really valuable asset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuardian_ Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Neither, there is no reason to do a panic trade. This team was built in summer, now is not the time to try to save jobs, not with this team. They would have to get Malkin to make a difference. BTW add a "discussion, speculation" or something to the title or they will lock you out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted November 18, 2016 Author Share Posted November 18, 2016 1 minute ago, TheGuardian_ said: Neither, there is no reason to do a panic trade. This team was built in summer, now is not the time to try to save jobs, not with this team. They would have to get Malkin to make a difference. Benning said he would probably need to trade a D for a young shooter. Tanev basically runs the defence, Edler has a NTC and Guddy was just aquired. Larsson, Biega and Sbisa won't get the Canucks what they need so if they are serious about what they are saying, it basically leaves Hutton or Tryamkin being valuable enough to move for a scorer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canada Hockey Place Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 These are not the D you want to let go...... Seriously though, tough call. Both are young, have potential and good contracts. Totally even between these 2 for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Making a choice doesn't mean one is good or one is bad... they can both be good and solid, just which one is most useful going forward. I would keep Tryamkin because he has the chance of becoming something special and unique like Byfuglien/Chara are. Hutton is likely to be a better scoring defenceman which we need... but I don't see him turning into a scorer like P.K. Subban. I think Hutton is more likely to have a ceiling like Salo... which is freaking dandy by the way. With all teams getting smaller and faster, you can try to chase that and catch up, or go a little bit another way. Hutton isn't going to out duel McDavid, but Tryamkin could make him stop making plays because of worry for his health. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuardian_ Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Apart from the Sedin line, this team would need to get 2, 30+ goal scorers to make a difference, last season they ended up minus 28 or something and this year, when they are healthier and more experienced, they are worse. One goal scorer isn't going to help all that much unless they plan to go all in for the boring hockey of the old NJD where they could win by scoring 2.4 goals a game. To do that they need defencemen. What young scoring guy might be available? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuardian_ Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 add a tag to the title Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 ? thread. Why would the Canucks unload a rookie or 2nd year player? The idea is to make the team younger, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 36 minutes ago, smokes said: If the Canucks had to lose one to get a young scoring winger. Who do you think the Canucks should keep. apologies Smokes, but we need both of those guys. Each brings a different skill-set to the team. The guy we should move in TANEV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted November 18, 2016 Author Share Posted November 18, 2016 1 minute ago, Alflives said: apologies Smokes, but we need both of those guys. Each brings a different skill-set to the team. The guy we should move in TANEV. It's no coincidence that the Canucks started letting in a lot more goals after Tanev was injured. If he leaves, the Canucks will really be a lottery team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 7 minutes ago, smokes said: It's no coincidence that the Canucks started letting in a lot more goals after Tanev was injured. If he leaves, the Canucks will really be a lottery team. Yup, trading Tanev almost certainly means we pick in the top 5. Plus, he just might return a good young (elite level) top six forward. It's a win now, and win in June trade. We would be getting two assets for Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 46 minutes ago, Type R said: I voted Tryamkin, but if it was my club, it would be neither. Hutton, Guddy, Tryamkin and Stetcher are untouchable. Edler or Tanev is debatable for me, my preference would be Edler (mind you this is the best he's looked in awhile), leaving Sbisa & Larsen (Sbisa also looking the best he has this year). Due to age alone, Edler is the logical trade piece, and teams like Detroit and Buffalo would love a steady guy like that. Edler to Detroit in a package involving Mantha, and then Tanev to Buffalo in a package involving Kane? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocksterh8 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Neither, it's a ridiculous idea from a desperate GM that has lost his mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Type R Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 1 minute ago, Pears said: Edler to Detroit in a package involving Mantha, and then Tanev to Buffalo in a package involving Kane? Yep, I could live with this. D would suffer for next year and a bit until Juolevi arrives, but its the future we are building here and these moves would help long term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerrDrFunk Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 What's wrong with having the two of them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.